What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Kearney

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
155,409
Does this guy even have a resume ?

He's never coached an NRL club before.

I'm not here to diss the guy but I cannot understand how our board can consider a coach with no achievements over a guy who got us the the GF last year.

Surley this is a kneejerk reaction by an inexperienced board, should it proceed, rather than a reflection of Anderson's performance over the two seasons that he has been in charge.

Even Benny's Broncos failed to make the 8 after winning a GF, imagine if he was sacked over that years performance.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,980
Yep I'm the same. He assisted a coach who's club cheated for a decade. Then rode the coat tails of Benny with the NZ side.

Massive gamble IMO.
 
Messages
13,894
when we has in charge of the storm they had 6 players out to play origin you goose.
If Kearney brings some passion back to this club then I'm all for it.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
36,056
Brian Smith or Wayne Bennett are the only 2 coaches that could get us out of this shemozzle.
 

spiderdan

Bench
Messages
3,743
Kearney is in a similar situation to what Anderson was before he took charge at the warriors and led them to the finals in his first year the the gf in his 2nd. Before then he was also unproven at nrl level.

If the alleged treatment of da is true I will continue to support parra but I won't back the board. My opinion of their efforts is they love playing with smoke and mirrors.
 

Noa

First Grade
Messages
9,029
Kearney will be a great coach, much of the Storms dominance can be put down to him. Sure you'll say cheats, boats, blah-blah-blah, but being overpaid played no role whatsover in the turnaround in the Stoms game, which began at the end of the 2005 season when Stephen became assistant coach.
 
Messages
285
Kearney will be a great coach, much of the Storms dominance can be put down to him. Sure you'll say cheats, boats, blah-blah-blah, but being overpaid played no role whatsover in the turnaround in the Stoms game, which began at the end of the 2005 season when Stephen became assistant coach.

You must be smokin some good weefer.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Agree with Twizzle. I've seen nothing of Kearney to say he will be a great coach, and really has DA done that bad a job? I'd say taking us to a grand final is a pretty damn good achievement.
 

DeanPay98

Juniors
Messages
1,116
Kearney comes from a club that cheated us three times in the last four seasons - 2006, 2007 and 2009.

Why would we sign him? We don't even know if he was fully aware of the salary cap scandal there.
 

Glenn

First Grade
Messages
7,436
Does this guy even have a resume ?

He's never coached an NRL club before.

I'm not here to diss the guy but I cannot understand how our board can consider a coach with no achievements over a guy who got us the the GF last year.

Surley this is a kneejerk reaction by an inexperienced board, should it proceed, rather than a reflection of Anderson's performance over the two seasons that he has been in charge.

Even Benny's Broncos failed to make the 8 after winning a GF, imagine if he was sacked over that years performance.

3P can do no wrong, they are the saviour of the club. :sarcasm:
 

boxhead

First Grade
Messages
5,958
This is what confuses me as well Twizzle.

I was talking to people in my family yesterday (they are all Parra fans) about this....
Say we are told today by Paul Osbourne that Daniel Anderson is gone and we do have a choice between Stephen Kearney and Ricky Stuart; who do we pick?
The logical choice is Ricky Stuart.

Why?
He is a proven NRL coach that has a premiership to his name, and yes he may have been terrible at the Sharks in 2009 and 2010 but look at his accomplishments and look at the stuff that other coaches go through; many good coaches go through bad seasons, a change of setting is often the perfect place to send a new coach and they can immediately make a positive impact. Look at Brian Smith this year, for the past few years he has struggled with the Knights, give him a change to a Roosters team and they are in a Grand Final.

We have to remember also that the Sharks relied heavily on Brett Kimmoreley, and it's no doubt that after a great 2008 season, they were near wooden spooners the two years following his departure. Without him, they have no attacking talent; it's why they have been so good in defence. The great positive about the Sharkies has always been their forward pack, the sad thing was that their halves in particular and also outside backs were generally not good enough to set up tries or attacking plays.
This will change, and along with a new coach it can bring massive positive change to the Sharks.

I believe it can do the same here with Sticky.
Would you rather take an unproven NRL coach (in first-grade) over a proven premiership winning NRL coach???

I agree with Noa's sentiments however that Kearney is a big reason the Storm go so well, he is a great assistant coach for them.
I guess the board's thinking is that he will bring some of the Melbourne Storm culture and experience with him; being tutored under Craig Bellamy is huge....could very well turn out to be what we need to have new attacking structure and have a coach that our players want to perform under; the big thing about the Storm over the past four years has largely been their consistency.

However, in saying that......it is still strange that they would pick Kearney over a proven coach.....which is why I raised this question to my family-does the board believe that he will bring something specific to us? Do they believe he will bring some Storm players with him or something? (Fat chance). Yes we have heard the rumours of Cronk and Adam Blair wanting to leave.....but surely that isn't the case.
Or perhaps Kearney has a good recruitment plan that he has told the board....
We will have to wait and see I guess.

IN any case, whoever the new coach is, we must stick up for them 100%. If we don't, and the board doesn't, we may as well accept the spoon....
 

Joely01

Bench
Messages
4,553
Why are we after a coach like Kearney no experiance when theres a coach like Ricky Stuart out there with no job and a lot better resume then a bloke who really hasnt proved himself.
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
I don't think anyone will agree but I would offer a contract to the Warriors under 20s coach, he has done wonders with that team and would bring out the best in our young islander boys like he has in NZ.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,165
you've gotta get your first coaching gig somewhere .... he's been assistant long enough to have picked up a thing or 2

i am not confident anything will improve any time soon - and i don't think the board have done a great job - but i'm not gonna die over whatever happens - sh*t happens
 
Messages
3,160
you've gotta get your first coaching gig somewhere .... he's been assistant long enough to have picked up a thing or 2

i am not confident anything will improve any time soon - and i don't think the board have done a great job - but i'm not gonna die over whatever happens - sh*t happens

We are all rookies at one point in our lives.

I mean Wayne Bennett was a rookie once. And look how his career has gone.

Kearney could become the next Bennet and we could have him for the next 20 years and win 6 odd premierships.

Or he could be Paul Langmack or Terry Lamb and totally suck.

But the one common thing about Bennet and Kearney is they both have great mentors.

Anyway, talk of Kearney coaching with the Eels is a bit premature. I have no idea what the future holds.

But if Anderson is sacked and Kearney hired he has 100% of my support and I dearly hope he becomes as legendary as Jack Gibson.
 

Angry_eel

First Grade
Messages
8,760
We have to remember also that the Sharks relied heavily on Brett Kimmoreley, and it's no doubt that after a great 2008 season, they were near wooden spooners the two years following his departure.

You do realise that we're more or less in the same situation as Sharks 2009/10. we don't have a halfback. Sticky cant win anything without a good halfback.
 
Top