adamkungl
Immortal
- Messages
- 42,971
source
Look it up yourself
source
the onus is on you to prove your shit, not meLook it up yourself
the onus is on you to prove your shit, not me
wanker
lolLol. That's of course assuming I care enough to go trawling through old articles to win an internet argument with a petulant child.
I dont think the severity of the incidents you highlight and their required punishments is in question, no doubt the second one is worse if proven to be trueFair enough re Fergo I forgot about that.
Re Inglis - that's the way DV matters often go. The spouse always gets cold feet. Doesn't mean it didn't happen. And certainly doesnt mean it shouldnt be prosecuted. She obviously gave sufficient evidence to police for the case to go ahead initally.
Do you honestly think pouring an alcopop on your spouse head deserves 7 weeks punishment and pushing your spouse around deserves none?
Do you honestly think pouring an alcopop on your spouse head deserves 7 weeks punishment and pushing your spouse around deserves none?
I dont think the severity of the incidents you highlight and their required punishments is in question, no doubt the second one is worse if proven to be true
Unfortunately for your argument it wasnt, it was turned over as the evidence presented didnt support the charge, if indeed GI was even charged.
Do I think that pleading guilty to assault (plus prior warnings about off field behaviour) deserves a few weeks sit down, yeah. 7 weeks, give or take, not overly fussed really. Players have got more for soft shoulder charges or pretending to hump a dog.
So what about Inglis then
source
Another recent case was that of Greg Inglis, who was charged with assaulting his partner in early 2010, and initially suspended by the Storm for two matches. A lawyer duly appeared at court and declared the charges would be defended, that Inglis had been acting in defence of his partner who was attempting self-harm, and that his partner had retracted her statement.
This declaration was enough for the Storm to put Inglis back on the field, and his 2010 season was then uninterrupted. On the date of his hearing, however, Inglis did not advance any argument that he was trying to prevent his partner from harming herself, and instead pleaded guilty to a less serious offence of assault as part of a plea bargain. The Age reported:
…Inglis accepted the information provided in Ms Robinson's initial statement to police that he had pushed her onto the bed with an open hand after she had 'got into [Inglis's] face.'
The magistrate recognised this incident was clearly at the less-serious end of the spectrum, and declined to record a conviction, but did order that he attend a men's behaviour change program and donate $3,000 to a women's health organisation.
Whether or not it was because the matter was heard in Melbourne, away from the glare of the Sydney media, the case disappeared without a trace. There were no calls, as far as I am aware, for the NRL to make an example out of Inglis, suspend him for any further matches or deregister him for the year or for life.
Perhaps those who might have made that call judged him too important to the game, and the professional interests that surround it. Perhaps the charge he pleaded guilty to was not considered 'serious enough' domestic violence.
Inglis and his partner married later that year, and the following year he re-settled in Sydney. There have been no reports of what Inglis got out of the counselling program, but every indication since then suggests it could well have been successful.
One journalist, Jessica Halloran, in the Sunday Telegraph, wrote a very positive piece about Inglis and his partner in April 2011, referring to the redemption he had achieved, post-assault, with the loving support of his partner.
Fair enough. I remember him not being charged for DVWrong. Inglis was diverted to vic drunks program. to be eligible he has to admit to being responsible for the offence. https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/fin...omes-for-criminal-offences/diversion-programs
So in fact its akin to a s10 in NSW - although no guilt is in fact recorded. Lucky him. Not exactly innocent, huh?
So what about Inglis then
well what would you call this?Fair enough. I remember him not being charged for DV
Inglis, 22, was later questioned by officers at Altona North police station and charged, before being given bail.
He will face counts of recklessly causing injury and unlawful assault in Sunshine Magistrates' Court tomorrow.
It sounds like the kind of grubby shenanigans a club like Parra would attemptDoes anyone know if we would have benefited cap wise from Terepo and Edwards' misdemeanours? What I am asking is if instead of just fining the players, would we have terminated their contract and worked their fine into a new one?