Knicks

[Tiger Hawk]

That team would leak around 397 points per game i recon. No defence whatsoever...

:lol: Agreed.

The problem with that line up everyone would still want to be putting up 20 ppg. ugh what a mess..

And agreed.

They don't need to trade for a big name player, or even trade Marbury as he comes off the books this year. I'd be trying to trade him, but not at the expense of limiting their cap flexibility further. The piece they absolutely have to move before 2010 is Randolph. The space he would free up alone would enable them to offer max to LeBron/Wade/Bosh. IMO the Bulls are a good fit, they need a go-to guy in the post but what do they take back? That's the only destination I think for Randolph, and not sure the Bulls would pull the trigger.

 

[Special K]

I think their best bet is just to sit back and do nothing honestly but I really doubt they will. If they want a superstar they'll have to trade and trade and trade. I can't see them cutting roster costs to ensure they have cap space in 2010 when they have been so bad for so long.

They'll have a decent pick this year but a lot of their future rebuilding will be told with it.

edit -randolph in chi I dont know about. They really f**ked up by missing gasol

 

[Ridders]

there definitely a market out there for randolph's, always will be for guys who can give 20-10 a night. Before this years trade deadline Denver were apparently trying to make a move for him. I don't think they'll trade for Marbury as if you do, you could possible end up in a worse position with a big contract that doesn't expire in the near future, at least Marbury's expires soon.

Chicago deal could be possible involving gordon, the bulls don't really know what to do with him with hinrich and hughes already in ther backcourt. I doubt he's going to be willing to come of the bench for much longer. Plus i'm pretty sure gordon comes a free agent pretty soon, they won't want to let him go for nothing