What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lets have a hybrid AFL/NRL game.

intentcity

First Grade
Messages
6,928
Yeah, and maybe they'd have better rhythm than the whites you RACIST :crazy: :sarcasm:.

Seriously though probably a valid point. We are pretty damn good at most sports that have got themselves established here even when compared internationally. What could have been? Give soccer time and it might get there too, though pretty much the rest of the world ahs a giant head start on us already. I really hope we have the population and resources to support as many codes as possible, so that we can beat (or at least be competitive with) anyone at anything we put effort into.

Australia will never be a soccer power, we have a small population and any athlete worth their salt plays one of the 3 traditional football codes or cricket, i put down the last WC effort to the coach, he did a similar thing with Sth Korea 4 yrs earlier.
 
Last edited:

caylo

Bench
Messages
4,870
Think about a team of NRL players playing AFL

Back: Inu, Dugan, Monaghan

Halfback: Cronk, Thurston, Pearce

Centre: Lewis, Falou, Wiliams

Halfforward: Prince, Hayne, Campese

full forwards: Barrett ,Inglis, Sutton

rovers: Lockyer, Farah, Smith

IMO that team will beat most AFL teams, while they may struggle a little with fitness they would have to much physical presence for any AFL team and could probably beat the all australian AFL team.
Now do the opposite with any AFL team and your lost for players to fill a position outside of 1-5, the lack of contact means these guys would be overpowered in any league style game.
 

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
Think about a team of NRL players playing AFL

Back: Inu, Dugan, Monaghan

Halfback: Cronk, Thurston, Pearce

Centre: Lewis, Falou, Wiliams

Halfforward: Prince, Hayne, Campese

full forwards: Barrett ,Inglis, Sutton

rovers: Lockyer, Farah, Smith

IMO that team will beat most AFL teams, while they may struggle a little with fitness they would have to much physical presence for any AFL team and could probably beat the all australian AFL team.
Now do the opposite with any AFL team and your lost for players to fill a position outside of 1-5, the lack of contact means these guys would be overpowered in any league style game.

You're having a laugh. Give me one AFL player that could last 80mins in the NRL...
NRL interchanges per team/per game: 10
AFL interchanges per team/per game: 150+
 

trudge

Bench
Messages
4,715
Kick to the fifty then you must beat league style defence and put the ball over the line between the goal posts. Get rid of the behind goals.
 

intentcity

First Grade
Messages
6,928
Think about a team of NRL players playing AFL

Back: Inu, Dugan, Monaghan

Halfback: Cronk, Thurston, Pearce

Centre: Lewis, Falou, Wiliams

Halfforward: Prince, Hayne, Campese

full forwards: Barrett ,Inglis, Sutton

rovers: Lockyer, Farah, Smith

IMO that team will beat most AFL teams, while they may struggle a little with fitness they would have to much physical presence for any AFL team and could probably beat the all australian AFL team.
Now do the opposite with any AFL team and your lost for players to fill a position outside of 1-5, the lack of contact means these guys would be overpowered in any league style game.


mate, even with 2 yrs training that team wouldnt be able to compete with a VFL (AFL seconds team), but let me explain why that team would be demolished against an AFL AA team, who's gunna ruck for starters?, remembering the AFLs AA ruckman is 7"2 and just doesnt lose hitouts, the midfeild you posted, i didnt even look at it TBH because fact is, i dont have to, they would be destroyed on an EPIC scale, the backs would be to put it simply, anilalated, the fwds would struggle big time mainly because the ball just wouldnt get down there, dont post rubbish dude.

and if im wrong and that team was competitive and looked like winning, the ?AFL could just let the leash of barry hall to teach the NRL boys some manners.
 
Last edited:

BIKER_DRAGON

Juniors
Messages
1,894
It has already been done

Read on

My source
http://www.rl1908.com/articles/AFL.htm

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Sean Fagan of RL1908.com
[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
codes.gif
[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]For Australian footy fans, nothing is more important to them than seeing their club battle towards the Grand Final. Throughout the last 100 years or so Australian Rules (AFL) and Rugby League have dominated weekly sporting attention in their stronghold cities.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] The southern states were the domain of the locally devised Victorian Rules game, while NSW and Queensland adopted Rugby League from England. This left Australia in a unique situation amongst the ‘football' playing nations - it was not dominated by one code.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] In the two most populated cities, Sydney and Melbourne, the sporting-minded could enjoy summer cricket battles between NSW and Victoria. But during winter, the two biggest states could only look across the border and see a football divide. It seemed the only way this would ever change, would be in the unlikely event of one code taking over the other's territory.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] However, in 1933 the administrators of both games thought they had the answer - they resolved to create a new ‘all-Australian football game' incorporating the best features of Australian Rules and Rugby League. In Sydney a secret trial match involving players from both codes was held to test the new game.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] This though wasn't the first occasion there had been talk of a merged game. At various times in the late 1800s Sydney's rugby authorities were faced with growing popularity of the ‘Australian game'. To counter it, they toyed with rule changes to eliminate scrums, allow the taking of fair catches (marks) in the air and punt kicks for goal. The Rugby Football Union in England though, who the NSWRU was bound to follow, would not countenance such changes.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] When Rugby League kicked off it's inaugural Sydney season in 1908, it became Australia's first professional football code. Entrepreneurs such as J.J. Giltinan provided the money to establish the game, and they were well aware of the huge crowds that patronised Melbourne football and the possibilities it offered. In July of 1908, on behalf of the NSWRL, Giltinan proposed a set of rules for a merged football code to the Victorian Football League.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Giltinan also offered the bait of international fixtures, telling the VFL if agreement on the game could be found, he would encourage the English Rugby League authorities to adopt the new rules while he was away with the Kangaroos. The tour proved to be a financial disaster for Giltinan and the VFL closed the matter - but not for long.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] In mid 1914 a Rugby League match was held at the MCG between England and NSW, renewing interest in the possibilities of an Australian-wide professional football code. In November of that year, officials of the NSWRL and the Australian National Football Council held meetings in Melbourne to thrash out rules for a merged game.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] It was agreed to trial the rules the following season, incorporate adjustments if needed and then make a final decision. The conference decided the game should be played on oval fields, with dimensions slightly less than used by Australian Rules. Scrums were eliminated, and the re-start of play after a score would be a centre-field bounce. The Rugby League off-side rule would apply, but only when played reached within 35 yards of the goal. The posts were to be rugby style with a cross-bar. [/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]While ‘behinds' were excluded from the new game, taking a mark in the air was to be allowed. Tries could be scored and were worth two points while all goals, whether from the field or conversions after tries, were valued at one point. Full tackling was permitted, provided it was made between the attacker's shoulders and knees. The ball could only be passed backwards and with no need to punch the ball. There would be no knock-on rule provided the same player regained possession.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] However, the increasing seriousness of World War One quickly saw the matter put aside and it was soon forgotten - or so it seemed.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] The July 1933 touring Kangaroos travelled to Melbourne to connect with the ship sailing for England. The team was entertained by the VFL at a luncheon at the MCG. With officials of both codes present, discussion came round to the possibilities of a combined game. The proposal of 1914 was resurrected, and this time it had serious momentum. [/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The news quickly broke in Sydney and Melbourne's papers and the officials of both games enthused at the prospects of increased popularity and financial goldmines. Mr Hickey (Victorian Rules) said: "If a NSW team, playing a truly national code, could travel to Perth playing en route in Melbourne and Adelaide, I doubt whether the ovals would be able to accommodate the crowds. The financial possibilities are unlimited. There are excellent features in both codes that could easily be adopted."[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Mr. Dargan of the NSWRL agreed with Hickey's view, but pondered "whether the increased interstate competition would compensate us for the loss of international fixtures".[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] A conference was arranged for early August 1933 as the movement grew in popularity amongst officials. Mr More (VFL) was as enthusiastic as most, calling on all to "search for a game for Australia, and forget about England." So confident had the movement become, they announced the game would be called the ‘Universal Football League'. Mr O'Connor (Qld Australian Rules) was an exuberant supporter of the cause: "If the brilliant, spectacular features of Australian Rules were combined with the hard, solid features of Rugby League we would have a game with which to storm the world."[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] A trial match was held at the Sydney Showground on August 11, 1933. The rules provided for 14 men a side, but they could only muster 12 each on what was a workday. Mr O'Connor was the referee and described the match "as a cracker". Other observers noted the players struggled with the rules and were constantly pulling out notes from their pockets to read what they should do.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] The conference ended with both parties agreeing to go back to their respective bodies with a recommendation to gradually implement the rules into their games and eventually the sports would be combined. It was also proposed to introduce a summer night match competition so players and supporters could familiarise themselves with ‘Universal Football'.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Mr. Flegg, President of the NSWRL, was not so captivated by the concept. He denounced those who supported the fusion as being disloyal to Rugby League and added that the new game would be a competitor: "Even if they retained 90% of League rules, and only 10% of the other rules, it still would not be Rugby League. There is nothing in common between League and any other game." Flegg added: "If they want a new game, get out of our game and form their own." [/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]At the next NSWRL meeting the report on the conference was considered and then politely put away.[/FONT]​
 

Fein

First Grade
Messages
5,249
I just can't see Rugby League players being able to cope with the melee that gayeffell offers.

200551607-001.jpg
 

Teddyboy

First Grade
Messages
6,573
dam, didn't know that, just imagine if it was successfull.
Yes it's the thing i dream about with either Rugby League and Union being one but looking like League or NRL and AFL being one but looking more like League.
The crowds and tv ratings would of been massive for a proper all Australian code.Plus the rules from what i read favoured Rugby League more as you could score a try.
 

chrisD

Coach
Messages
14,759
I'm perfectly fine with league being only in the two premier states and for the rest of the country to do as they please with their inferior population and athletes. I, as a league fan, have nothing to gain from any such amalgamation with that mess. Honestly, there's not much to gain from a union amalgamation either, except we'd get to see the Kangaroos destroy more international competition, but then for scheduling they'd have to shorten the NRL competition, and I'm not sure it'd be worth it.
 

Teddyboy

First Grade
Messages
6,573
What would the rules look like, i cant even follow AFL

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It was agreed to trial the rules the following season, incorporate adjustments if needed and then make a final decision. The conference decided the game should be played on oval fields, with dimensions slightly less than used by Australian Rules. Scrums were eliminated, and the re-start of play after a score would be a centre-field bounce. The Rugby League off-side rule would apply, but only when played reached within 35 yards of the goal. The posts were to be rugby style with a cross-bar. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]While ‘behinds' were excluded from the new game, taking a mark in the air was to be allowed. Tries could be scored and were worth two points while all goals, whether from the field or conversions after tries, were valued at one point. Full tackling was permitted, provided it was made between the attacker's shoulders and knees. The ball could only be passed backwards and with no need to punch the ball. There would be no knock-on rule provided the same player regained possession.[/FONT]​
 

Latest posts

Top