meltiger said:
I dunno, have you read PRE this morning or watched Media Watch?!
I'll take a bow to some of the BB posters for making The Age look so bloody stupid :lol:
I thought the daily rags were taking their inside info from the Internet forums anyway?
I should say that I don't much disagree with the general gist of the post, but moreover the responses to it and the desperate attempts of the tools to try and differentiate themselves from other struggling clubs from previous years.
Some romantics have tried to argue that the Bombers would be a top four threat with Lloyd back in the side! :roll:
As if that's their only concern.
They do have some good young prospects, but they find themselves in the bottom four (again) for similar reasons that other clubs have found themselves there.
They are light-on for depth and lack genuine strength down their spine. They also have a weak midfield grouping and lack strong rotation options. On top of this, they are also short on leg speed across the park.
They'll miss a PP this season and will talk all sorts of pompous nonsense about how they are a club that is above such things. As a club they were one of the loudest opponents to the PP set-up a couple of years back and their fans were always talking about how they'd never bottom out like other clubs.
They could use a PP bigtime right about now, and regardless of comments to the contrary, don't think for a second that deep down the club wouldn't love that extra high rated youngster.