Gardenia
Bench
- Messages
- 3,066
That looked like a completely different team compared to what we saw earlier in the season. The drop in cohesion, energy, and execution was hard to ignore.
It had shades of the Mary era—passive, disorganised, and mentally rattled.
What makes it so concerning is that this felt uncharacteristic of what we've seen so far under Flanno. While we haven’t always been disciplined, there were clear signs of strike power and an ability to post points. That simply wasn’t there last night.
The basics were poor—far too many silly errors, and our set completion rate was way off the mark. You’re never going to build pressure or control the tempo of a game playing like that. We gave the opposition too many cheap possessions and let them dictate the terms.
Is it psychological? Fatigue? Have teams figured us out tactically? The attack looked directionless, and defensively we were reactive rather than proactive.
Looking for proper assessments here—not just the usual “we’re crap” takes. What are people seeing in terms of structure, mindset, or game plan that might explain the drop-off?
It had shades of the Mary era—passive, disorganised, and mentally rattled.
What makes it so concerning is that this felt uncharacteristic of what we've seen so far under Flanno. While we haven’t always been disciplined, there were clear signs of strike power and an ability to post points. That simply wasn’t there last night.
The basics were poor—far too many silly errors, and our set completion rate was way off the mark. You’re never going to build pressure or control the tempo of a game playing like that. We gave the opposition too many cheap possessions and let them dictate the terms.
Is it psychological? Fatigue? Have teams figured us out tactically? The attack looked directionless, and defensively we were reactive rather than proactive.
Looking for proper assessments here—not just the usual “we’re crap” takes. What are people seeing in terms of structure, mindset, or game plan that might explain the drop-off?