bayrep said:
I agree JJ. But the money has to come from somewhere. Does the NZRL get any transfer fees for every young player that is registered with the NZRL that gets picked up from our BC ?? If not then its just a black hole that the NZRL will never be able to cover and the standard of the BC and NZ refs are always going to be below par. Which means that if Aus wants international Referring of the highest order they need to include some kiwi's in the NRL. So the question comes down to whose fault is it that Black isn't of international standard ?
Black may well do fine, but he's never refereed at anything like that standard.
It's easy to blame everything on the Australians - but from where I sit the NZRL (along with previous Warriors administrations) have been bumbling idiots who have live off the coat-tails of the Australian game.
The game doesn't need international football to survive. The Aust comp has a NZ based team, and many NZ based players - NZ players based in Australia have always lifetd our standard. I am sure they're open to NZ refs in the NRL, so Mr Black should look at that.
But the NZRL needs to get of it's proverbial and do something, generate income streams somehow, get better sponsorship, develop local coaches (the stat of NZ coaching is appalling) and NZ referees... instead of whinging incessantly about Aust doing this and Aust doing that. Or the UK doing this and the UK doing that.
The Australians are better than us for a number of reasons - including
1. they have more players
2. they have better systems for player, coach, and ref development (unlike ozbash, I firmly believe that Williams would not be as well developed a player as he is if he had stayed in NZ)
3. the players are taught the fundamental skills better - tackling, offloading (when as well as how) etc etc (the poms used to think they were boring, but the bottom line is you're gonna spend about half the game tackling, so you'd better learn how to do it)