What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Manly Eagles Angels have been ‘useful idiots.’

Zavos

Juniors
Messages
9
When the Brett Stewart affair blasted its way on to the radio airwaves, the television screens and the newspaper front and back pages, the immediate reaction was what did the self-styled Eagles Angels, a group of prominent women in Sydney, make of it all.

The Angels include Johanna Griggs, Sarah Murdoch (who is often photographed in a Manly jersey), Louise Sauvage, Layne Beachley, Brooke Hanson, Melinda Gainsford-Taylor, triathlete Nici Andronicus, and Wendy Harmer, the no-nonsense comedian.

Many of the Angels are mothers.

All of them, one would guess, have come up against objectionable male macho behaviour in their private and public lives. All of them, too, have passion for rugby league generally and the Manly club in particular.

Their Angels support group for the club reflects that passion and also a PR attempt to match the ’soccer mum’ syndrome that has helped football to spread throughout the suburbs of Sydney.

The day the Stewart affair broke in the Sydney Morning Herald, Jacquelin Magnay, an award-winning sports writer, ran an article which was headlined: Angels give their vote of support.

The vote of support, amazingly, was for Stewart and not the teenager who was allegedly harassed by the Manly star.

Harmer was quoted as saying that many of the Angels would be very pleased to provide a reference for Stewart: “On a personal basis, we have found him very respectful, well-mannered and a humble person.”

My wife (who was a founder of the Women’s Electoral Lobby in New Zealand) could not believe this statement when she read it: “Where is the concern for the young women in all of this?”, she asked.

Magnay also reported that many of the Angels were too distressed about the allegation to comment.

Again, the emphasis seemed to be on protecting Stewart rather than showing even a shred of solidarity or concern for a teenager who was put through an experience that the Angels would surely not wish any of their daughters to have to go through.

Even after Stewart was charged by the police, we are still waiting for the Eagles Angels to express their outrage at what has happened to the teenager.

For that matter, we are waiting still for them to apologise to the young woman whose father (a Manly sponsor) was hit by Anthony Watmough when he tried to stop the player from pestering his daughter at the now infamous Manly 2009 season launch.

Lenin knew a thing or two about propaganda and he used the phrase the ‘useful idiots’ to describe true believers who were prepared to put the cause ahead of the any other consideration.

The Eagles Angels have been ‘useful idiots’ for the Manly Eagles club.They had stood by their man, Stewart, despite the allegations and the court charge.

Their credibility is destroyed.

Their reason for existing, which was to show how women-friendly the rugby league code really is, has been destroyed. Their judgment is appalling.

How they could defend Stewart, before the facts of the matter had been established and later by their silence after he has been charged, defies all understanding.

How can anyone take seriously what Harmer has to say about social issues, or sports matters, when she puts forward the notion that “we found him (Stewart) very respectful, well-mannered and a humble person” as an argument against him doing what he was alleged to have done to a teenager who had none of the prestige or standing in the community that she and the other Eagles Angels had.

The point about thuggish behaviour by drunken players is that it is invariably inflicted on people who do not have the power to stop it. Even the ‘useful idiots’ should have known this.





http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/03/13/manly-eagles-angels-have-been-useful-idiots/
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
I don't like the way the article goes about making the point. What is The Roar anyway (didn't click)?

There's a useful point hiding in that article somewhere, but it's been buried by too much vitriol instead of building the case against the Angels stance.

*No offence, did click and only just realised you're promoting your own work... :oops:*
 

Hindyscrack

Bench
Messages
3,433
Surely one of the regular union trolls with a new username. Not even Spiro would be stupid enough come on here and spin his usual crap... Bagging the hell out of Rugby League in order to try and drag it down to unions level.

As for the Eagles Angels being idiots, if Brett Stewart is claiming innocence, why would they not stand by him? Once again another league detractor has failed to remember the presumption of innocence to proven otherwise. I thought the rugger brigade were supposed to be educated.

Yet another fail from Spiro, he really does his best to polish the turd that currently is rugby union while bagging any other sport.
 

Cloud9

Guest
Messages
1,126
Its no surprise that the Eagle Angels are towing the same line as the Club. They are an extension of the club. I wouldn't be pointing the finger at them yet. They should be given a right of reply after the judge has made a decision.
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
yeh i don't really get the criticism. if they were a feminist group or something i would get it, but they are part of the club. of course they arent gonna come out and criticise a player.

also since nothing has been proved in court, they have every right to support Stewart
 

Dragon

Coach
Messages
14,982
I would've described them as 'useless eaters'

But that would be very elitist of me.
 

boonboon

Juniors
Messages
734
They are a club representative and they gave their personal opinion of what they new of Stewart - nothing has been proven and if it was I am sure they would not support him then - Just because they are female doesent mean they have to have a certain opinion without any facts - its not like they said anything about the case at all - what a stupid article clearly written by sumone with a grudge
 
Messages
17,822
They are a club representative and they gave their personal opinion of what they new of Stewart - nothing has been proven and if it was I am sure they would not support him then - Just because they are female doesent mean they have to have a certain opinion without any facts - its not like they said anything about the case at all - what a stupid article clearly written by sumone with a grudge

A grudge...check out below.
 

Eagle_Rocker

Juniors
Messages
546
What the hell? That is one of the most stupid things I have read on this forum.

Every woman I have spoken to about the Brett Stewart incident (admittedly most have been Manly fans, but not all) believe he is innocent and that there is more to the story than we have heard through the media.

Not all women have to automatically side with the woman's side of the story. The Angels know Stewart to be a very decent person who has not ever put a foot out of line, so why wouldn't they stand by him when he has said he is innocent?
 

Zavos

Juniors
Messages
9
Eagle Rocker, when Stewart himself doesn't remember what happened is that more than a little disconcerting to you as both a League and Manly fan?

Also somebody here make themselves useful and shove this up on the official Manly forums for that other Greek to read, Zorba.
 

Latest posts

Top