Weaponhead
Coach
- Messages
- 10,997
An email trail linking the four sacked members of the Sharks football department demonstrates that they feared possible doping breaches at the club at least two months before May 29, 2011, when sports scientist Stephen Dank was told to leave.
Copies of emails, dating to March 2011 and linking football manager Darren Mooney, club doctor David Givney, physiotherapist Konrad Schultz and trainer Mark Noakes show they could have informed the Cronulla board much earlier of the possible use of performance-enhancing drugs at the club.
The trail also includes a warning from a doctor at another NRL club.
The NRL has confirmed information obtained by Deloitte Forensic and funded by the NRL has been sent to the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority. ''It is ASADA's investigation,'' an NRL spokesman said. ''We hired Deloitte Forensic and they passed the information on.''
Advertisement
The Sharks conducted their own separate inquiry, leading to the sacking of the four staff and the standing down of coach Shane Flanagan because of failure of management practices. This is in keeping with ASADA penalties which reflect the additional duty of care of people in supervisory positions, with sanctions between eight years and life for those found guilty of doping offences.
Flanagan has subsequently been reinstated, following evidence he was not part of the email trail.
But the emails demonstrate that the four sacked members of the football department should have acted sooner against Dank and trainer Trent Elkin.
Flanagan has also been reinstated because the NRL and the Cronulla board clearly see him as a mentor, offering advice to the 14 Sharks players being investigated by ASADA.
While some members of the board justify the initial standing down of Flanagan because a head coach is expected to be an all-seeing eye at a club, they recognise the confidence the Sharks players have in him.
Flanagan, who is signed for a further two seasons, can be expected to study the ASADA drug code and potential range of penalties available and make recommendations to players who hold him in a position of trust.
If players were suspended for six months, they could be back for the 2014 season.
ASADA will recommend some six-month penalties via its maximum discount of 75 per cent of a two-year ban, provided the players offer ''substantial assistance''.
The legal and PR costs to the Sharks, together with their own forensic accounting, have indebted the cash-strapped club to the NRL for at least five years.
Board elections will be held next month and voting tickets are being arranged, but the future of the club, involving a possible relocation to Perth, will be in the hands of the NRL, not the incoming directors.
NRL sources indicate the Sharks are not privy to ASADA's intelligence, thought to have been obtained by phone taps and surveillance.
Protocol demands this evidence first be placed in front of players at interviews, giving them the option of co-operating.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/sharks-had-warning-20130324-2gny9.html#ixzz2OUx1dY4r
Seems the board did have some evidence for the sackings.