Brisbane's defence, in particular their first contact and intent in defence, was several levels above what I expected from them for most of the match. I don't think you give them any credit for that, nor their resilience to not fold when they could have. The rest of what you said I agree with, but those 2 factors about their performance you undersell a bit for mine. We can talk stats and drop balls until blue in the face, but Brisbane showed some backbone against us and credit to them for doing so imo. Especially in the first half. There's no doubt it frustrated us and we were impatient.
I don't think we turned any corners, for what it's worth - I just think Brisbane were gritty and better than you suggest on the back of that alone - even if they are also largely incompetent otherwise. I wish we showed what Brisbane did tonight when we had most of our team injured, tbh. We've had all of the incompetance that Brisbane had tonight on show this year, but with none of the grit and competitiveness. Brisbane can actually build off that if they can bottle it and keep it in their game, and I'd kill for a dose of it in our game.
I don't think this is the disaster you're making it out to be. It would have been if we didn't bag the 2 points, for sure - but the result matters. We could have easily lost tonight, and we have in the past under similar circumstances. I'm willing to take a positive or two out of that and move on to next week.. At the end of the day, it's a valid point that we don't have a lot of game time with our spine. The 4 day turn around is relevant too, I doubt they got a single ball session in in that time. Do you think Brisbane were better or worse than the Cowboys when we pumped them 38-0? That's the only other game we've had Ponga, Pearce and Clifford together. What value do you place on having Brailey on the park too?