lainey
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,726
PantherCraig said:oh really!!!!!!!!!
Read between the lines Lainey and all will be fine.
Sorry you lost me on that one.....whose lines do you want me to read between????
PantherCraig said:oh really!!!!!!!!!
Read between the lines Lainey and all will be fine.
Big Artie said:well everybody wot about a group hug, geez fibroman had a month of bucks parties, if I rememeber
Big Mick © said:LMAO again.
Pot...Kettle...Black.
The Rhino said:He was found guilty of misconduct. All reports of what was in Mick Leary's report is PURE SPECULATION ie WHAT THE MEDIA THINKS IS IN THERE - Miss Pearce made a statement to Penrith CEO Mick Leary, not the media. What the misconduct is made up of and what is in the report by Mick Leary will be known only to the Panthers Board, Gowie himself and the NRL's David Gallop. What happened that night will known only to those who were there. All incidents are alledged and remain that way because the report by Mick Leary was not and has not been released to the media and no complaints were made to the police. I'm not saying he is innocent of what he has been accused of, it's just the full story has not come out. And as for Dawny, I got the opinion that she only knew what she did because Miss Pearce spoke to her the morning after (and even Dawny said she spoke to her the next morning).
PantherCraig said:I said that Dawn was reported to have been a witness to a number of incidents. I never said which ones. But that doesnt bother you does it. As long as you can jump in like the hero.
And which statement have you read where it says there were no witnesses to the groping incident?
PantherCraig said:I am sure PK reckons she has read Tatums statement.
Still waiting for the link to it too
PK said:It's on the internet and very accessible for you to read if you can be bothered searching for it.
I know both Big Mick and I have read the same article as he also stated the article that was printed in a newspaper the day before hearing and where both statements are stating what we have said earlier in this topic in regards to the *alleged* groping.
But tell us, why should we make your job easy for you? Why should we do the research on your behalf? When you are the one stating that Dawn witnessed a series of events.
We all know she didn't. She *apparently* has witnessed one according to the media. But you are trying to tell us otherwise.
So wouldnt that be just rubbishing your posts which you are accusing me of doing?