crocodile
Bench
- Messages
- 3,551
Yes. It is alleged only at this point. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.so an (alleged) cheating player should be allowed to play until after the season has ended? makes sense
Yes. It is alleged only at this point. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.so an (alleged) cheating player should be allowed to play until after the season has ended? makes sense
Be a bad look if we eon the comp and Jenkovic got the Clive Churchill medal then gets banned for 4 years. He needs to stand down based on international sport protocols.Yes. It is alleged only at this point. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.
Unless a few of them test positive then yes, I’d say it is a coincidenceIs it a coincidence this happens the year Elkin comes on board...?
All that too but I also understand the underlying principle of our heritage where one is innocent until proven guilty. Using the same logic, suppose we lost the GF in extra time without a key player and he was found not guilty.Be a bad look if we eon the comp and Jenkovic got the Clive Churchill medal then gets banned for 4 years. He needs to stand down based on international sport protocols.
Sports policy states you can’t play if your A sample tests positive. This isn’t a criminal proceeding. It’s sport policy. Jennings knows this, I know this, everyone knows this. And Jennings agreed to abide by these rules when he decided to a professional athlete. You want them to change the rules for Jennings?All that too but I also understand the underlying principle of our heritage where one is innocent until proven guilty. Using the same logic, suppose we lost the GF in extra time without a key player and he was found not guilty.
Is it a coincidence this happens the year Elkin comes on board...?
Yes.Sports policy states you can’t play if your A sample tests positive. This isn’t a criminal proceeding. It’s sport policy. Jennings knows this, I know this, everyone knows this. And Jennings agreed to abide by these rules when he decided to a professional athlete. You want them to change the rules for Jennings?
I think they might come in the same product, not that it matters.So they are saying its more than one banned substance. Thats not good. After his disastrous 2018 his form improved coinciding with a new child and settled family life. Hard to see anyone putting all that at risk. Same stuff as Segearyo and Jacks apparently. Looks like a very sad ending to a great career.
I am a big fan of presumption of innocence but these drug ones always end up the same so P of G for me.
Either he has done this his whole career or he is trying to get one more contract. Either way totally selfish stuff.
Like I already said, I get that. I don't have to agree with it.Sports policy states you can’t play if your A sample tests positive. This isn’t a criminal proceeding. It’s sport policy. Jennings knows this, I know this, everyone knows this. And Jennings agreed to abide by these rules when he decided to a professional athlete. You want them to change the rules for Jennings?
I am a big fan of presumption of innocence but these drug ones always end up the same so P of G for me.
Either he has done this his whole career or he is trying to get one more contract. Either way totally selfish stuff.
Xerri - Tested November 2019
Results May 2020
Jennings - Tested 21 September 2020
Results 9 October 2020
I couldn't understand the Xerri delay , pissed me off but then read some stuff into it
They, ASADA, were trying to get the big fish rather than just Xerri.
In other words they had Xerri followed and traced, all the while you would imagine Xerri thought he had passed or dodged being sprung so business as normal. They got him to do another test just before covid resumption, was no good either , then they announced it cause he was about to play his first game since the Nov 2019 test
The big difference for me is....
Xerri never played a game when tested positive in Nov 2019
Looks like Jenko played a couple
Though it did stuff things up for the Sharks. They woudl have loved to have known in November to prepare their season. But at the end of the day, its not about them, there was a bigger picture
What if the player sourced them himself and only ever took them at his home?interesting. Clubs should pay a price as well in my opinion as it happened on the clubs watch.
What if the player sourced them himself and only ever took them at his home?
Yea that’s cool, as long as we agree that the club had nothing to do with it.Then you kill his family.