Missing me already???Well...

[Anonymous]

El Duque, picking somebody up over that doesn't really prove a whole lot.


Sanjane, some of what you say i'd agree with to some extent. If you stopped hyperbolising so severely some other people might agree with you as well. But to class Chanderpaul a great and go on to say Hayden won't be is quite simply ludicrous.

 

[sanjane]

ED Can't you bar him from this forum or somthing?

keep trying mate, one day you might leap over kegg, but El Dickhead is catching up too!!!!!

Timbo doesn't sound like he's your mate either. You have serious comprehension issues.

nah, but i like him...he makes me look so good!!!!

 

[sanjane]

El Duque, picking somebody up over that doesn't really prove a whole lot.


Sanjane, some of what you say i'd agree with to some extent. If you stopped hyperbolising so severely some other people might agree with you as well. But to class Chanderpaul a great and go on to say Hayden won't be is quite simply ludicrous.

man, about chanders:

-he's got another 10 years left in him (if he can get over the injuries that seem to bug him every series)
-i said hayden won't be remembered as a great, but chanders MIGHT...simple reason: he's got time on his side, plays for a weak team, has been involved in more seasons of international cricket than hayden has despite the age difference, he's not great yet...but neither was dravid 10 years ago.

 

[sanjane]

and also WI fans saying the record is WIndian should always be etc etc means that they DON'T think of hayden as a thief eh? just a friendly burglar who returns things after 5 months!!!!HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Where do West Indies fan say this???

I bet they're glad some racist moron is going around telling all and sundry they think Hayden is a "thief".

[\quote]

all and sundry.....you think i'm telling everyone that just cause i mentioned it in a post in a leagueunlimited forum...well, just like always...you aussies have your own lil world to focus on that excludes the real thing...but who am i to judge?

 

[Anonymous]

I guess i'll have to disagree with you then.
I think you are way over critical of Australian players. It just makes your other stuff look like garbage. If you cut out the controversial crap people would actually listen to you and have to refute your points.

 

[sanjane]

I guess i'll have to disagree with you then.
I think you are way over critical of Australian players. It just makes your other stuff look like garbage. If you cut out the controversial crap people would actually listen to you and have to refute your points.

...like wat i'm wondering....in my first post wat was so controversial, so racist, so watever...
then El Dick comes along...

 

[sanjane]

ED Can't you bar him from this forum or somthing?

It would be nice if we didn't have to put up with his inane, racist drivel but he here and that's the way the cookie crumbles. If we're lucky he'll piss off back home as he clearly hates Australians as is evident from his posts about us. What kind of idiot lives in a country full of people he hates anyway :?

Just ignore the tool. His sh*t makes no sense anyway.

Hate is such a strong word....and if Australia was full of El Dicks i wouldnt be here...but thankfully it isnt and thankfully its a great place, filled, for the most part with good-hearted ppl

 

[El Diablo]

You've displayed your racism and hatred in other posts. Shit, someone who was married (?) to a Sri Lankan made you look like the fool that you are after one of your bullshit outbursts.

Piss off back home.

 

[Anonymous]

I think he has a point about Hayden. He'll do well to go down as a "great" considering the length of time he struggled to make the team. He certainly has a couple of factors on his side though, like the ridiculous amount of matches Australia gets to play these days keeping him in good nick and inflating his stats.

 

[Anonymous]

Agreed Thierry. Hayden probably shouldn't go down as a great, simply because he has not sustained his level of acheivement for anywhere near the period of time others have.

 

[Red Bear]

ok since you guys are so into statistics:

lara vs hayden:

who's got more runs in test matches
who's got the higher of the test scores
who's got more centuries
who's got more half-centuries
who was rated higher by Wisden in their century analysis
WHO IS NEVER GOING TO GET A 400?

only to one of the above questions is the answer: Hayden (you know which...)

also WHO IS THE ONLY one OUTSIDE OF MR 99.94 BRADMAN to get 2 triple centuries?????????????????????

look, Ricky Ponting will go down as great, Adam Gilchrist likewise, McGrath and Warne already are, but of the rest...they're just good! They may seem great now, but look 10 yrs after their careers are over. You'll remember Hayden and Boof and all the rest, but us international supporters will remember Warne, Murali, BRIAN Charles, Dravid, Gilchrist, Tendy, McGrath, Vaas, Kumble... and maybe Ponting, Chanderpaul as great but no Hayden, Langer....(there's a reason Hayden has only played about 5 years of continuous cricket...that rules him out as a great player in anyones book!)

Who has had more tests and more innings?
I like Brian Lara but i dont like you and your bullshit anti-oz ramblings. and Vaas great? he's a good bowler but there are shitloads of bowlers better than him out there.

 

[sanjane]

...and the fact that lara's played more innings and tests than hayden makes him the worse player? i dont think i want you to like me...

 

[El Diablo]

i dont think i want you to like me...

Don't worry, nobody on the planet likes you.

 

[Red Bear]

...and the fact that lara's played more innings and tests than hayden makes him the worse player? i dont think i want you to like me...

No, but it could acount for the fact that he has more runs than hayden? I mean you are going to get more runs if you have had an extra 96 innings.

 

[sanjane]

...and the fact that lara's played more innings and tests than hayden makes him the worse player? i dont think i want you to like me...

No, but it could acount for the fact that he has more runs than hayden? I mean you are going to get more runs if you have had an extra 96 innings.

longevity man, longevity. just coz hayden has had a blistering 4 or 5 years of late, doesnt make him great in the long run.

Thanks for vindicating my point

 

[Anonymous]

Pardon me, but I thought in Cricketing terms 5 years counted as a 'long run'?

 

[El Diablo]

...and the fact that lara's played more innings and tests than hayden makes him the worse player? i dont think i want you to like me...

No, but it could acount for the fact that he has more runs than hayden? I mean you are going to get more runs if you have had an extra 96 innings.

longevity man, longevity. just coz hayden has had a blistering 4 or 5 years of late, doesnt make him great in the long run.

Thanks for vindicating my point

vindicating your point :lol:

You didn't have one.

 

[El Diablo]

Pardon me, but I thought in Cricketing terms 5 years counted as a 'long run'?

Hayden is white. Sanjane doesn't like white people. They are corrupt, cheats, thieves etc etc

You should know that by now.

 

[SirShire]

...and the fact that lara's played more innings and tests than hayden makes him the worse player? i dont think i want you to like me...

No, but it could acount for the fact that he has more runs than hayden? I mean you are going to get more runs if you have had an extra 96 innings.

longevity man, longevity. just coz hayden has had a blistering 4 or 5 years of late, doesnt make him great in the long run.

Thanks for vindicating my point

You are a tool Sanjeev.

 

[Anonymous]

ok since you guys are so into statistics:

lara vs hayden:

who's got more runs in test matches
who's got the higher of the test scores
who's got more centuries
who's got more half-centuries
who was rated higher by Wisden in their century analysis
WHO IS NEVER GOING TO GET A 400?

only to one of the above questions is the answer: Hayden (you know which...)

also WHO IS THE ONLY one OUTSIDE OF MR 99.94 BRADMAN to get 2 triple centuries?????????????????????

look, Ricky Ponting will go down as great, Adam Gilchrist likewise, McGrath and Warne already are, but of the rest...they're just good! They may seem great now, but look 10 yrs after their careers are over. You'll remember Hayden and Boof and all the rest, but us international supporters will remember Warne, Murali, BRIAN Charles, Dravid, Gilchrist, Tendy, McGrath, Vaas, Kumble... and maybe Ponting, Chanderpaul as great but no Hayden, Langer....(there's a reason Hayden has only played about 5 years of continuous cricket...that rules him out as a great player in anyones book!)

Who has had more tests and more innings?
I like Brian Lara but i dont like you and your bullsh*t anti-oz ramblings. and Vaas great? he's a good bowler but there are shitloads of bowlers better than him out there.

Part of being great is being able to play test cricket for 10 years. #-o

There's a reason hayden hasn't played for anywhere near as many innings as Lara - he wasn't up to test standard for as long as Lara. Make sense?