What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Missing me already???Well...

sanjane

Juniors
Messages
1,287
man, why am i a racist?

-cause i come from another country?
-cause i call your country one with great people?
-cause i criticise 20 or so Australians every now and again? and you cant really defend their actions?
-cause i support Muttiah Muralidaran?
-cause i have different opinions to yourself?
-cause i think brian lara is better than matt hayden?

Why? give me proof that i'm racist. otherwise don't call me one.

Honestly man, there's a white Australian guy next to me (who also tries to defend your team) but he's laughing at your posts man....hahahahahaa!
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Read your posts you've made. I'm not going to sit here all night dragging up your numerous racist remarks against the white folk.

Shit, don't you remember getting embaraassed by a post made by someone with a Sri Lankan wife (?) after one of your outbursts?

The fact you don't even think you;ve said anything wrong just shows how pathetic you are.
 

sanjane

Juniors
Messages
1,287
The message was as follows:

Vanakkam,

Quite perplexed here.

My wife happens to be Tamil, from Chennai. She thinks white Australians are fantastic people.

She also said that never in her life did she consider marrying an Indian/Tamil man. She thinks they are all selfish, egotistical bores.

When her sister came to Australia for the wedding, she too decided after meetings Australians that she would one day hope to marry a white Australian male... she loves them too.

And she came here with a somewhat prejudiced view against Australians.

They too were 'allowed' to enjoy there time here by white Australians.


so since he posted likewise, I am a racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!wat kind of a dictator would you make?????
and wat did i say in reply? --that indeed most aussies are great! so i'm racist????
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Don't you think this is racist? If not, you're in denial.

You said this about a Bedhi because he thought Murli was suspect

sanjane said:
bedi's whitewashed...he no longer speaks for the subcontinent. no indian likes him. after all, he respects warne as a person!

and again

sanjane said:
good ol' Bishan Bedi, he lives in OZ man...he's whitewashed


Here's the post from Kurt Angle after you bagged WHITE Australians.

Kurt Angle said:
sanjane said:
Pity the local (actually the local australian ppl are the aboriginal, i meant the white) ppl here dont make you enjoy it (ask anyone in the indian camp)

Vanakkam,

Quite perplexed here.

My wife happens to be Tamil, from Chennai. She thinks white Australians are fantastic people.

She also said that never in her life did she consider marrying an Indian/Tamil man. She thinks they are all selfish, egotistical bores.

When her sister came to Australia for the wedding, she too decided after meetings Australians that she would one day hope to marry a white Australian male... she loves them too.

And she came here with a somewhat prejudiced view against Australians.

They too were 'allowed' to enjoy there time here by white Australians.

Sanjane -> Suthu

I couldn't be nothered posting the rest of your crap. It was enough the first time.
 

sanjane

Juniors
Messages
1,287
whitewashed...is that racist? all i said is that whites and us have different ideals, viewpoints etc...so bishan bedi's could not be included as a non-Australian one on the basis that he's lived here for half his life and has been listening too much to the Aussie, yes..white media.

about the white-aboriginal thing...well, you guys aren't the locals really. So when i said locals, i paused and rephrased. Hey, el dick, its not very smart for you, yes WHITES...to be bringing up aboriginals vs whites when talking about racism...

now none of that proves i am a racist and nothing can coz i am not one!!!!!

el duque, if anything you are cause you just dont accept anyone else's viewpoint, you just bash them personally

also dick, what does nothered mean? after all, english is not my 1st language! i couldn't be NOTHERED to tell you what is:)
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
The insult our racist friend dishes out to kiwis who don't agree with him

sanjane said:
jj- you say you're a kiwi, but do you have an aus passport? coz i think you do. you obviously enjoy sticking up for them and putting subcontinental teams down.

.

The biggest laugh is you think it's OK for sub-continent teams to swear because whites don't understand them therefore they're not being offensive :roll:
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
We shouldn't nhave to put up with his racist crap. Imagine if you started bring skin colour into the debate???

I'm sure as shit children don't act like this goose. Parents would pull them into line quick if they brought racial insults into the school yard.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
He hasn't been racist directly. He's never said anything about skin.

For instance, it's a well know fact that within the ICC, England, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa vote together. Think of what binds them. Are they racist? It's not that simple...
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
He's mentioned the colour white quite a few times. If that's not about skin then what's it about??

whitewashed...is that racist? all i said is that whites and us have different ideals, viewpoints etc...so bishan bedi's could not be included as a non-Australian one on the basis that he's lived here for half his life and has been listening too much to the Aussie, yes..white media.

Look at his explanation for whitewashed for example.

He never said "whites and us have different ideals and viewpoints". He used the term to discredit Bedi He's virtually calling Bedi a white man as if that's a bad thing and therefore his opinion matters little.

Just look back through his posts and you can see the hatred in them. He disgusts me.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
I actually can see his point on the whitewashed thing. Dunno about previous posts, I can't be arsed looking.


Alot of people from the subcontinent, caribbean asian countries etc. talk about the different values of white people vs dark people. Let's not get into the debate, but when i first read what he said before he explained himself i took whitewashed as another term for uncle tom. Whether or not you think that statement (uncle tom) is racist or not i don't know.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Could be. Told a bit of a racist joke a few years ago. He was very harsh on Joe Frazier in calling him an Uncle Tom, Gorilla etc etc

Whether he actually meant those things or was it just a bit of a show?? Who knows.
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
33,268
sanjane said:
ok since you guys are so into statistics:

lara vs hayden:

who's got more runs in test matches
who's got the higher of the test scores
who's got more centuries
who's got more half-centuries
who was rated higher by Wisden in their century analysis
WHO IS NEVER GOING TO GET A 400?

only to one of the above questions is the answer: Hayden (you know which...)

also WHO IS THE ONLY one OUTSIDE OF MR 99.94 BRADMAN to get 2 triple centuries?????????????????????

look, Ricky Ponting will go down as great, Adam Gilchrist likewise, McGrath and Warne already are, but of the rest...they're just good! They may seem great now, but look 10 yrs after their careers are over. You'll remember Hayden and Boof and all the rest, but us international supporters will remember Warne, Murali, BRIAN Charles, Dravid, Gilchrist, Tendy, McGrath, Vaas, Kumble... and maybe Ponting, Chanderpaul as great but no Hayden, Langer....(there's a reason Hayden has only played about 5 years of continuous cricket...that rules him out as a great player in anyones book!)

the village idiot is back eh...

I haven't got to the next few pages, but this moronic post needs a brief retort.

1. I think most would agree that Tendulkar is actually the most talented batsmen of this era.
2. Lara has played twice as many tests as Hayden, so given they're both class players, I'd expect Brian would be disappinted if he hadn't scored more runs, more centuries and more 50s...
3. Hayden opens and has the superior average...
4. An average of 57 opening, doesn't leave any room for debate in terms of greatness.


They're both superb players, and you're just stoooopid - to be fair though, same pitch, same result... and how can "when it counts" be in a dead rubber, series lost, featherbed pitch....
 
Messages
3,986
Tommy Smith said:
fish eel said:
And yes, BC Lara is the best Batsmen in the world and Hayden has no chacne at the record - there's a reason only 2 men have scored 2 triple centuries.
But where was he in the firt three tests of the english series?
I can't believe people come up with this argument. The question should be: where were his team-mates when Lara was alittle out of form with a finger injury? As usual, they were nowhere to be seen.

Lara failed in six innings as captain, and because the team lost people want to blame him. Well Ricky Ponting also failed in Sri Lanka and finished the series with an average of about 30. Why arent people on his back claiming he doesnt perform when it counts? Oh i know why, its because he has the quality teammates around him to still win the series.

The funny thing is, Ponting came out of that series will people saying "he's adjusted to captaincy brilliantly", whereas after the Windies series in SAfrica where Lara batted his heart out and scored a double ton, and another ton and a couple of half-centuries, people questioned his captaincy because they lost the tests 3 nil. But anyone could see that wasnt his fault because despite his efforts they simply didnt have the bowlers.

And you talk about Lara's consistency, awell it's a complete myth that he isnt consistent. He is the fastest batsmen in history to reach 9000 test runs, faster than Tendulkar and faster than Steve Waugh and Alan Border by about 40 innings. :shock: Are you going to tell me that Tendulkar was incocnsistent and Waugh and Border were incredibly inconcsistent? The ONLY reason people assume he is incocnsistent is because the Windies lose all the time. But he cant help that if he doesnt have the bowlers AND the batsmen to help him out when he fails. I mean look how Steve Waugh went against India when Aus were without McGrath and Warne. India scored runs at will yet that wasnt Steve Waugh's fault was it.

I rate Lara as the best player on his day. Lara is the one out of Tendulkar, Hayden, Waugh, Border and all the great players of recent times that when he gets a hundred it is usually a huge one. Double hundreds triple hundreds. I am glad Lara got the record back as it is a great achievement aqnd it was against a better quality opposition that Zimbabwe were. But I don't rate Lara above Hayden or Tendulkar. These three are the best attacking players I have seen along with IVA Richards and to seperate them would be doing an injustice. Dravid, Waugh, Border all good players but the above quartet will be revered as greats when they are finished.
 
Top