What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Most shafted team in the competition (spoiler)

Front-Rower

First Grade
Messages
5,297
Benefit of the doubt should of been applied, try should of been awarded. However all you people talk about Richards elbow, take a look at his other hand. It may have scraped the touch in goal line before his elbow or the ball hit the ground
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Having just had a look at the replay, it was pretty obvious that he was out anyway. The elbow was leading the ball the whole way. No way did the ball ever get down prior to the elbow.
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,385
Raider_69 said:
xwizit said:
how did all this raiders vs tigers fans beef start anyway>? :lol:

some wanker tiger fans claiming "it wasnt O"Donnells fault Mick Monaghan has a glass jaw" after that sickening shot last season

Who was it?

Which Tigers fan?

Surely this post would stand out and be remebered....as would the poster.

I remember who said they were stoked to see benji do his shoulder as well as his season earlier on this year.
It was some wanker raiders supporter.

No wonder he's an EX- mod.
 

Grantwhy

Juniors
Messages
1,285
Tiger Mo said:
pcpp said:
When a ball hits the sideline simultaneously, its not a try.

The ball didn't hit the sideline, his elbow did the same time he planted the ball down. If it's simultaneous or a line ball decision, Benifit of the doubt goes to the attacking team. Is it that hard to understand? Where is the consistency?

Actually, if he, as you belive ;-), touched the sideline at the same time as forcing the ball then 'No Try' is the correct decision :p.
 

Latest posts

Top