Southern Rooster said:
I believe the so called urine was actually beer being thrown over brawling participants down below. Easily mistaken for urine is the SFS beer I know. ....
True. I find SFS beer weak as pi#s also....
As for "taking it easy on the dogs". That is the problem! The NRL has been taking it easy on them for years! What happened after they ran riot through Church Street in Parramatta in 2000? Big fat duck egg! Hence we still have violent dog's crowds.
Peponis says "We are going to search videos and ban the culprits". Bollocks, that has been said before, over and over again. And clearly the action the dogs take internally is insufficent, if infact they really do take action at all. And judging by their lack of action (and don't tell me they can't act) towards players who have breached the clubs code of conduct over the last couple of years, that is the case
Again i remind you that stupid word "minority" doesnt fit. 14 other clubs may have 1% ( a minority) of supporters who are bad news, but the bulldogs seem to have about 5-10% (still a minority just a freaking bigger one) who cause trouble regularly.
And again i ask. What did North sydney fans do wrong? a hell of alot less than bulldogs fans.
poetic tragedy wrote:
The positive drug tests? Oh you mean the one where Willie Mason decided to sue because he was innocent?
Please show me the court shedule that shows Mason appearing as the defendant! Here's the thing. Mason coming out and saying i am considering sueing for defamation, isnt him pledging his innocence, its a scare tactic.
I am willing to bet $1 million that Mason wouldnt go to court over it! Especially because the statement he made
"People who know me, family and stuff like that, know I'm totally against drugs" is in itself.. well lets just say "if'e"
