What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Rules For ODI's

Earl

Coach
Messages
16,804
THE International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced it will introduce major rule changes to one-day international matches on a 10-month trial basis starting on July 30.

The major alterations, which were approved at a meeting of the governing body's chief executives' committee (CEC) in London, involve an extension of the current 15 overs fielding restrictions and the introduction of replacement players. Under the new rules there will be an increase from 15 to 20 overs of restrictions where teams are only allowed two players outside the 30-yard circle.

Unlike the present system, where the fielding restrictions are only in place for the first 15 overs, the new set-up means they will apply for the first 10 overs of every innings plus two additional blocks of five overs which must be selected by the fielding captain.

The CEC decided that the additional close-catcher field restrictions, where two stationary players must be within the 15-yard inner circle, should only apply for the first 10 overs.

The CEC also approved the introduction of football-style replacements, which will permit sides to replace a player at any stage of a match.

The replaced player will be ruled out of the rest of the match, while the replacement will be entitled to assume any remaining batting or bowling duties. Both players will receive a cap.


Currently substitutes in all forms of cricket are generally only permitted to field.

The two innovations may be trialled during the NatWest Challenge between England and Australia starting on July 7 at Headingley.

However, the England and Wales Cricket Board and Cricket Australia will both need to give their consent before the new rules can be introduced in the three-game series.
The changes will be be reviewed by the ICC's cricket committee, chaired by former India batsman Sunil Gavaskar.

As well as the one-day changes, a proposal to undertake a technology trial during the Super Series in Australia in October was also approved.

This will allow on-field umpires to consult with the TV umpire on any aspect of any decision, with the final decision remaining with the on-field umpire.

The only exceptions to this will be line decisions, which will be dealt with by the TV umpire in the same manner as at present, and clean catches, where the existing process will also be retained.

Meanwhile, the ICC also announced the establishment of an expert panel to work with the game's lawmakers, the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), and manufacturers to review the rules governing cricket bats.

Concerns have been expressed that some leading players' bats exceed the permitted width of four-and-a-quarter inches and that, following a banned practice in baseball, some bats have been injected with cork in a bid to increase their power.

Law Six, the rule relating to bats, currently states that "the blade of the bat shall be made solely of wood".

In particular, the CEC considered the specific case of the controversial Kookaburra bat used by several international players, including Australia captain Ricky Ponting.

These have a thin film of graphite running down the back in a bid to strengthen the blade.

The CEC did not make a definitive judgment but agreed that the bats should be allowed pending a final decision from the MCC on their legality in relation to current regulations.

That substitsion rule too me is bull plop. I think it will be bad for the game.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,079
it could work OK, but I see this rule being milked a bit

McGrath gets replaced by a genuine batsmen when its time for him to bat

or vice versa if the batsman bats first

if the team is named before the toss, this could be a bit tricky, we have to see how it goes
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
What a stupid rule. No wonder ODI's are losing credibility like nothing else.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
It's an extreem version of the old ING cup rule where a side had 12 players named, but only 11 could bat, so your bunny never had to go the middle. It didn't last long either.

A substitute is just genuinely stupid.
 

Earl

Coach
Messages
16,804
All their trying to do is americanise the game.

As a captain all you have to do is bowl first with about 8 genuine bowlers in your side, then substitute them all for genuine batsman for the second 50 overs.

Its bloody stupid.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
*Now pinch hitting for Glenn McGrath.....*

cue organ music.
 

budz

Juniors
Messages
1,646
Yes that rule is stupid. But i do like the change to the fielding restrictions changes. And how the fielding captain can choose when to have the next 5 over blocks of fielding restrictions. This will get rid of the boring period of singles between overs 15 and 40.
 
Messages
134
Yeah the fielding restrictions rule is a good one. Substitute is not so good. Perhaps it could be used for injuries, but I think that it is bad.


It is obviously trying to keep up with the new 20/20 cricket so that the original ODI doesn't lose its appeal.
 

Latest posts

Top