I refuse to believe that V`landys has made so many public statements about this being a record broadcast deal if he didn`t truly believe he couldn`t deliver it, he must know a lot of things that we don`t.If ten outbid nine it means Stan aren’t serious about the pay tv rights so it means a poor tv deal
The old deal is low that’s his benchmarkI refuse to believe that V`landys has made so many public statements about this being a record broadcast deal if he didn`t truly believe he couldn`t deliver it, he must know a lot of things that we don`t.
I think the main positives are:The best thing about SoO being on another channel is we won’t have to hear about predicted origin trams after r1
Playing devils advocate here.- FTA split as follows
- Regular season on 9
- Origin on 10
- International on 7
Why would 9 promote the afl Grand final when they don't have the rights. Commentators mention rugby and afl in games now. There is no way they don't mention SOOPlaying devils advocate here.
Why would 9 promote SOO or internationals if on another channel?
Channel 10 viewership is low now, so the non-diehard league fan won't know SOO is on 10 if they can't be bothered searching instead of having all games on the 1 channel who would then cross promote.
Maybe more value to the FTA provider in having regular season and SOO bundled together they would offer more for the rights rather than separate packages.
Do they actually promote it with ads or during their league coverage or just in their sports reports?Why would 9 promote the afl Grand final when they don't have the rights. Commentators mention rugby and afl in games now. There is no way they don't mention SOO
Do you think the people who don't have the super bowl that year don't mention it
Yeah, and if you combine an already low current deal with new/extra content going into negotiations.. then yeah, he has VERY good reason to be bullish.The old deal is low that’s his benchmark
They used to always use IMG for World Cup rights.
There was an article saying they might get involved in the nrl tv rights.
Super league certainly should be using them
The article lists the years IMG was involved in the World Cup rights.They used to always use IMG for World Cup rights.
?
There was an article saying they might get involved in the nrl tv rights.
Super league certainly should be using them
The main positives for me are:I think the main positives are:
1) Not having to put up with Gus
2) No ads for the block.
I am slightly torn - having everything on one FTA provider is simple for people. But it means the others will ignore it.
On the other hand, fragmentation is very confusing and would likely limit cross promotion.
What would people think about something like:
- All games of any variety on a single PayTV provider be that Fox or DAZN.
- FTA split as follows
- Regular season on 9
- Origin on 10
- International on 7
That is a nice spread ensuring that all networks get on board and promote. But i can see 9 throwing a hissy fit if they don't get it all.
As a bonus one of them could pick up late night NRL Europe.
They're just consultants I think.?
Doesn't IMG run Super League now?
V'landys has been working his butt off to get the product to where it is, promote it and grow the ratings and profile of the sport both here and abroad.I refuse to believe that V`landys has made so many public statements about this being a record broadcast deal if he didn`t truly believe he couldn`t deliver it, he must know a lot of things that we don`t.
