It may well have been head on head contact first. No good replays have been shown.I thought he'd get more, hard to see any real defence being mounted to this.
As was I. But I think as the grade is low there's some mitigating factor at play. In fact I would not have been surprised if it got a reckless gde 2 rather than careless gde 2.It looked pretty obvious to me.
And, based on penalties for similar offenses the past couple of years, I was expecting 3 weeks. Possibly 4.
Then bye so he actually gets 4 full weeks off. Fresh for the bunniesSo tigers and raiders
Nah Billy Burns isnt a first-grader imo.... shuffle the pigs. Should have Royce and/or BHU back. As much as I'd like to see Iro have a crack...wouldn't disrupt the Sifa/Ronnie combination.Will be interesting to see what Fitz does. Sifa to 2nd row and bring Iro in? Burns in as a straight swap? Do something weird with an existing middle and bring back BHU?
Put it back in the box Stake. A centre who has been held back due to bad defence onto the edge to defend. On the right where he doesn't normally play. Big ask.Out of the box, Iro to backrow
Spot on five Burns a run - tigers were something else this arfo- you could play Monty Burns and we would be sweet I reckon.A like for like change would be Billy Burns, and considering the opposition we are playing next week aren’t much chop I’d be comfortable throwing him in
I was saying Boo-UrnsSpot on five Burns a run - tigers were something else this arfo- you could play Monty Burns and we would be sweet I reckon.