Non Footy Chat Thread II

[Noise]

How many times has Novak got Covid anyway? Some would have us believe that natural antibodies from the virus are the best kind.

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12387086

 

[hineyrulz]

Sadly, we’ll never know because Nadal and Federer are all round nice guys who never break any rules.

@Avenger

 

[Gary Gutful]

The risk is not that broad. It’s specifically defined.

At least now you are accepting it’s about risk, and not calling me stupid.

WTF? I literally said ‘I don’t think it’s just about risk’.

 

[Gary Gutful]

@Avenger

I was stirring slightly, but realistically could anyone imagine either of them pulling the shit that Novak has tried to get into the country?

 

[Avenger]

In 116 section A:
(a) the decision to grant the visa was based, wholly or partly, on a particular fact or circumstance that is no longer the case or that no longer exists; or

(aa) the decision to grant the visa was based, wholly or partly, on the existence of a particular fact or circumstance, and that fact or circumstance did not exist; or

He lied about not traveling 14 days prior. That’s a fact that did not exist. He was traveling to Spain

The power rests with section 113 not 116.

 

[Avenger]

I was stirring slightly, but realistically could anyone imagine either of them pulling the shit that Novak has tried to get into the country?

Not when it’s been clinically proven that Roger pisses out lemonade and Rafa’s turds are pure snickers bars.

 

[Avenger]

WTF? I literally said ‘I don’t think it’s just about risk’.

Sorry mate. No glasses. I didn’t see the don’t part plus I’m angry and need an espresso and a rakija.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Not when it’s been clinically proven that Roger pisses out lemonade and Rafa’s turds are pure snickers bars.

Some of the Roger and Rafa love from the media is over the top and sickening, but they would never do half the dumb shit that Novak has done in his career.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Sorry mate. No glasses. I didn’t see the don’t part plus I’m angry and need an espresso and a rakija.

All is forgiven

 

[Avenger]

Some of the Roger and Rafa love from the media is over the top and sickening, but they would never do half the dumb shit that Novak has done in his career.

I will admit that those two can read the room better than Novak.

 

[Gary Gutful]

The power rests with section 113 not 116.

Do you mean 133 (which is what you quoted)?

You can’t read Section 133 in isolation. It directs you to 116.

#DenisDenuto

 

[Avenger]

Journalist Paul Bongiorno the arse licker of the media heavyweights reckons Djokovic is out today.

So you will all get what you want. I hope Novak fights it in court.

 

[Noise]

The power rests with section 113 not 116.

133 specifically references the conditions in 116.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Journalist Paul Bongiorno the arse licker of the media heavyweights reckons Djokovic is out today.

So you will all get what you want. I hope Novak fights it in court.

That’s unlucky if true. His team put forward a solid case.

 

[Avenger]

133 specifically references the conditions in 116.

How can he not the pass the public interest criterion? Answer me that. The (b) portion of section 133 which must be satisfied before he is deported.

 

[Avenger]

https://www.news.com.au/sport/tenni...c/news-story/f48109ef20068028caf0b05173853183

An injunction would be gold.

 

[84 Baby]

How can he not the pass the public interest criterion? Answer me that. The (b) portion of section 133 which must be satisfied before he is deported.

or the person represents a danger to the Australian community, or a segment of that community.

You and the anti-vaxxers may not agree with it but if they deport him it’ll be because of that

Edit - or should I say their justification will be community endangerment.

 

[84 Baby]

https://www.news.com.au/sport/tenni...c/news-story/f48109ef20068028caf0b05173853183

An injunction would be gold.

A win against a ministerial power will be a lot harder to obtain then a win over Joe Blow, Border Force. Djokovic would have to show the reasoning in the cancellation is wrong. He wouldn’t be able to argue that the minister shouldn’t have used his power (well he could but he’d very very likely lose)

 

[Gronk]

https://www.news.com.au/sport/tenni...c/news-story/f48109ef20068028caf0b05173853183

An injunction would be gold.

^^^ it's all happening

Report: Novak under fresh investigation

Fresh reports emerged on Thursday claiming Spanish authorities are investigating Djokovic over his arrival into the country.

The tennis star said his agent incorrectly ticked “no” on a form asking if he had travelled in the 14 days before leaving for Australia, when in fact he had gone from Serbia to Spain in that time, where he practised ahead of the year’s first grand slam.

Spanish publication COPE reports agencies are looking into whether he entered the country illegally.

 

[Gronk]

Novak's lawyers might take note of this governments history of ignoring court orders.

Injunctions are often ignored and heels are dug in deep. They then use tricks and f**kery to cause frustration.

Three members of Biloela family granted year-long visas but they’ll have to remain in Perth

Youngest daughter Tharnicca must remain in community detention, meaning family can not return to Queensland

www.theguardian.com

Members of the Biloela family – the Tamil asylum seekers mired in a years-long battle to remain in Australia – have been granted 12-month bridging visas allowing them to remain in the country.

But they cannot go back to their previous home in central Queensland.

The immigration minister, Alex Hawke, granted visas to three of the four members of the Murugappan family on Thursday: parents Priya and Nades and to Australian-born daughter Kopika. But no visa was granted to the family’s youngest daughter, Tharnicaa, who was also born in Australia.