hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 154,150
Geez mate have a spell, jumping at shadows now.Veiled racism ?
Geez mate have a spell, jumping at shadows now.Veiled racism ?
The guy who runs Tennis Serbia’s Instagram vs Gary Gutful? I know which one is least likely to be biased and it’s not the guy who runs Tennis Serbia’s Instagram account.Which one is more important and carries more weight to assess him as a person?
Reflect on what you posted and change that f**king avatar.Geez mate have a spell, jumping at shadows now.
Well the full bench upheld the minister's right to make a ministerial decision. So the court yesterday agreed that the legislation allows the minister to use his discretion. You will note that the first few sentences of the Chief Justice's ruling was stating this very fact. So my point is that the Immigration Act allows the minister to make a call and the reasons within that decision can't really be be debated.Firstly it isn’t immune from judicial scrutiny, because yesterday happened.
Secondly, should a ministerial power not have a higher level of leniency? They are highly discretionary, are of policy and are of themselves policy making. To overturn such a power (used correctly) would seem rebellious by the court.
P.S. I’m the furthest thing from a Hawke apologist. I’ve had personal run-ins with him and I hate his f**ken face.
What’s biased about it giggles? He did those things. Gronk’s tweets are opinions. Mine are a reference to a financial transaction.The guy who runs Tennis Serbia’s Instagram vs Gary Gutful? I know which one is least likely to be biased and it’s not the guy who runs Tennis Serbia’s Instagram account.
Telling Gronk to stop posting biased Tweets right after posting a biased Instagram post is f**king laughable.
So now you are just paraphrasing what I posted about administration law earlier this morning to make a point. That’s ok.Well the full bench upheld the minister's right to make a ministerial decision. So the court yesterday agreed that the legislation allows the minister to use his discretion. You will note that the first few sentences of the Chief Justice's ruling was stating this very fact. So my point is that the Immigration Act allows the minister to make a call and the reasons within that decision can't really be be debated.
It’s biased because it’s trying to paint Novak as a saint. And fan boys such as yourself are blind to or choose to ignore all the idiotic shit he has done. Yes he did those nice things that your post mentioned but he’s also done a whole bunch of bad shit that your post fails to mention. Do you understand the meaning of the word bias?What’s biased about it giggles? He did those things. Gronk’s tweets are opinions. Mine are a reference to a financial transaction.
Lol if you saw any racism in what I posted you are kidding yourself. You’ve played the race card at every turn which has been embarrassing.Reflect on what you posted and change that f**king avatar.
Mate, read my posts from the beginning. I don’t agree with his vaccination stance and agree he should not have been given a visa in the first place. I know exactly what bias and prejudice is. You and the the rest of the mob here are demonstrating it now. This is why the majority of the posts here have been about me defending Novak a d you guys attacking after the horse had bolted and he was allowed in.It’s biased because it’s trying to paint Novak as a saint. And fan boys such as yourself are blind to or choose to ignore all the idiotic shit he has done. Yes he did those nice things that your post mentioned but he’s also done a whole bunch of bad shit that your post fails to mention. Do you understand the meaning of the word bias?
You calling people on here a ‘disgrace, dopes, sheep, arrogant, ignorant and racist’ because you were the only one who understood the facts which would see those 3 judges yesterday let him stay has certainly kept the topic bumbling on.Mate, read my posts from the beginning. I don’t agree with his vaccination stance and agree he should not have been given a visa in the first place. I know exactly what bias and prejudice is. You and the the rest of the mob here are demonstrating it now. This is why the majority of the posts here have been about me defending Novak a d you guys attacking after the horse had bolted and he was allowed in.
Imagine how dead this dormant forum would be in the off season if we didn’t have the distraction of Novak Djoković.
You reckon the A League or that other shit sport called cricket could give it a pulse?
Well at least it’s good to see you finally understand the facts of the case.So now you are just paraphrasing what I posted about administration law earlier this morning to make a point. That’s ok.
And it’s not about whether Novak was given a fair go. Not yesterday anyway. That was last week when a Judge not an opinion tweet stated that he was stitched up and did nothing wrong.
Gary can speak for himself and I give him credit for being a lot smarter and more measured than you. You’re just an angry little man backtracking.Lol if you saw any racism in what I posted you are kidding yourself. You’ve played the race card at every turn which has been embarrassing.
Is it they hard to believe he’s not liked because a turd??? You only have to see Gary’s list for conformation. But but but the media and evil west hate him because he’s a successful poor innocent Serbian.
If he was a yank you would want his head on a Pike and rightly so.
Like I said read my posts in chronology. I knew he would lose yesterday because it is almost impossible to defeat a God Law. Remember when I said that legal matters are usually won with the path of least resistance. It happened yesterday. It was never about whether the right decision was made. It was about the lawfulness of an administrative decision.You calling people on here a ‘disgrace, dopes, sheep, arrogant, ignorant and racist’ because you were the only one who understood the facts which would see those 3 judges yesterday let him stay has certainly kept the topic bumbling on.
What a load of shit. You thought he’d win his case yesterday because you thought you knew the facts and the legal process. You posted this on Saturday afternoon:Like I said read my posts in chronology. I knew he would lose yesterday because it is almost impossible to defeat a God Law. Remember when I said that legal matters are usually won with the path of least resistance. It happened yesterday. It was never about whether the right decision was made. It was about the lawfulness of an administrative decision.
Nothing bumbling about that. You just don’t understand the legal process. The good thing for you is I’m here to teach you despite your bias. There’s that word again that you don’t quite understand and cannot delineate.
Unfortunately your biased and misguided understanding of the case were wrong.I’m confident my views and understanding will be reflected in what happens by hopefully 3 judges during their summing up tomorrow.
Back tracking where am I back tracking???Gary can speak for himself and I give him credit for being a lot smarter and more measured than you. You’re just an angry little man backtracking.
And let me tell you about racism. It’s what I perceive that matters. And I perceive a hint of racism with all things Novak and I can because we are of the same background. And don’t think I’m the only person with a Serbian background in this country and around the world that feels this.
We can’t be all dumb merkins.
I said ‘summing up’ not decision. There is a difference and if you had attended a court you would know what I’m talking about. They indicated yesterday they they will present this in the coming days. There they will further explain to you how helpless and restricted they were yesterday. You still don’t get it and what I’m trying to say.What a load of shit. You thought he’d win his case yesterday because you thought you knew the facts and the legal process. You posted this on Saturday afternoon:
Unfortunately your biased and misguided understanding of the case were wrong.
The immigration minister is not the only one with personal powers, nor are we the only country that provides individuals with like powers. They can 100% be challenged and the reasons are the only thing that can be debated. Novak’s failing was you can’t argue a difference of opinion (I.e. whether deporting or not deporting him would cause the greater unrest) against a ministerial power. He needed to provide factual evidence that the reasons were incorrect. And 99.99% of the time, the minister is going to word the cancellation so that there’s not really any facts to argue against.Well the full bench upheld the minister's right to make a ministerial decision. So the court yesterday agreed that the legislation allows the minister to use his discretion. You will note that the first few sentences of the Chief Justice's ruling was stating this very fact. So my point is that the Immigration Act allows the minister to make a call and the reasons within that decision can't really be be debated.
I’m trying to convince you that Novak is not a semen holder. He is an incredible person and I’m trying to demonstrate that the western media have influenced your opinion on himBack tracking where am I back tracking???
I’ve said all along Novak is an absolute jizzmop and shouldn’t be allowed to play. I’ve been proven right. All you’ve done is abuse people question their intelligence and even played the race card. You are easily one of my favourite posters in here but you’ve been off on this one way off. Maybe your gut needs some more fibre or you have an ulcer because your gut has been analed.
That’s definitely racistjumping at shadows
Gary can speak for himself and I give him credit for being a lot smarter and more measured than you. You’re just an angry little man backtracking.
And let me tell you about racism. It’s what I perceive that matters. And I perceive a hint of racism with all things Novak and I can because we are of the same background. And don’t think I’m the only person with a Serbian background in this country and around the world that feels this.
We can’t be all dumb merkins.