NRL JUDICIARY

[millersnose]

well looks like an impasse

we are not going to convince each other richo

so.... on with our lives :lol:

 

[millersnose]

well looks like an impasse

we are not going to convince each other richo

so.... on with our lives :lol:

 

[PJ]

but would you call it NRL bias against the sharks?

and by the way PJ you going down on saturday?

Q1. No, but I never said there was one against us. However I also don't think we get the dream run the Rorters get with guys like Morley and Crocker.

Q2. Hope so. Depends on the babysitter, who still isn't confirmed. Why?

 

[blacktip-reefy]

This girl will babysit for you. Still want to go to the match?

<---------------

 

[PJ]

This girl will babysit for you. Still want to go to the match?

Yep.

Come back a bit drunk and she can finiah off a good night for me

 

[Macca]

The judiciary is so inconsistent that it is a joke. You wouldn't know if they did show bias for sure but some clubs appear to get an easier time with them. That could be because those clubs have better lawyers though.

I think the Gallen incident highlights the inconsistency perfectly. Gallen got 2 weeks for fighting which he deserved. The Kiwi throws about 7 hooks straight into the other blokes head and doesn't even have to front. That's just a joke.

 

[King of the Hill]

I agree with PJ and not with millsy