What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL may Veteo Bulldogs sponsorship

ByRd

First Grade
Messages
5,937
NRL vetoes Bulldogs sponsor

http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/lhqn...222978010.html

Brad Walter and Glenn Jackson | April 10, 2009

THE Bulldogs have been told by the NRL that they cannot wear the name of the club's new major sponsor on their jerseys for Monday night's clash with South Sydney - and might have to scrap the $2 million deal altogether.

After believing their nine-month search for a new sponsor had ended when they announced a three-year deal with the Strathfield Group yesterday, the Bulldogs were informed that the arrangement could be in breach of a condition prohibiting clubs from entering into sponsorship agreements with rivals to the NRL's main backer, Telstra, which pays about $12m a season for naming rights to the competition.

Negotiations between the Bulldogs and the Strathfield Group had been ongoing since January but the NRL was not aware of the deal and last night advised the club to put the agreement on hold.

"There is certainly a problem at this point and certainly in the short term, we have told them it shouldn't go ahead," NRL marketing manager Paul Kind said. "There is a process and protocols in place but they haven't been followed and we only became aware of the sponsorship when the Bulldogs called a press conference.

"Therefore no approval had been granted in regards to the sponsorship and we have concerns that the company involved is in competition with Telstra."

Kind said the NRL had "a lot of sympathy" for the Bulldogs and had supported the club's efforts to improve its image but the league also had to protect the interests of Telstra.

There are also concerns about the links between the Strathfield Group and failed retailer Strathfield Car Radio, with chairman Vaz Hovanessian having performed the same role when the company went into administration last year.

"That's something that we want to understand more about because the old company was an Optus re-seller," Kind said. "We've made sure that as we've negotiated new deals we have opened up opportunities for the club but the one category the clubs can't sell into is telecommunications."

Coincidentally, the Bulldogs agreement with Strathfield Group contains a get-out clause insisted upon by the company so it could scrap the deal should players misbehave.

Bulldogs chief executive Todd Greenberg, who has acknowledged to the NRL that correct procedures were not followed before the club signed the deal, said the clause was "standard" over the past four or five seasons. Another club boss said it was "highly unusual" and another said the clauses were implemented after the Coffs Harbour scandal.

It is understood the clause allows the sponsor to pull out of a deal should it suffer "material loss" as a result of player misbehaviour. So while a scandal of the scale of the Coffs Harbour incident would be enough to end the relationship, minor alcohol-related incidents might not be.

Hovanessian laid down the law to Bulldogs players yesterday just minutes after the deal was announced.

"Every player will know that the type of contract we have signed with the Bulldogs requires their commitment to behaviour," he said.
 

ByRd

First Grade
Messages
5,937
"We've made sure that as we've negotiated new deals we have opened up opportunities for the club but the one category the clubs can't sell into is telecommunications."

With that quote being said, then why is it ok for Vodafone to sponsor the Warriors but Strathfield may not be allowed??? its a joke
 

Game_Breaker

Coach
Messages
15,164
WTF!!!

Seriously, what a joke. Companies giving sponsorship money to a club in tough economic times and the NRL say no?



These guys are pathetic
 

Game_Breaker

Coach
Messages
15,164
"We've made sure that as we've negotiated new deals we have opened up opportunities for the club but the one category the clubs can't sell into is telecommunications."

With that quote being said, then why is it ok for Vodafone to sponsor the Warriors but Strathfield may not be allowed??? its a joke



Exactly, Vodafone sponsor the warriors

They're a direct competitor to the Telstra. Strathfield just happen to sell some products connected to Optus


:crazy:
 

ByRd

First Grade
Messages
5,937
Its not a definite no but they shouldnt even be thinking about it, there is nothing wrong with it. They say no team can go into telecommunications, then why are the Warriors sponsored by Vodafone???
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,237
lol the NRL must be close the worst run organisation in the country.

The sooner an independant commission comes in the better.
 

LeagueNut

First Grade
Messages
6,980
Re: The Warriors/Vodafone thing ... the Vodafone sponsorship was in place before the Telstra sponsorship, and the NRL couldn't go back and block existing sponsors when Telstra insisted on this "exclusivity" thing.
 

The Tank

Bench
Messages
4,562
Seriously the NRL should f**k off with this sponsorship bullsh*t. Let the club's operate themselves. FFS no wonder there's no money in the game.
 

Nightward

Juniors
Messages
874
Reminds me of the fit VB pitched at Castlemaine Breweries because it had a contract with the NRL to be their "official beer" but was not on sale at Suncorp. And they complained about the signage in the area.

Sometimes, you just want to yell "STOP BEING AN IDIOT" until they, you know, stop being an idiot. Sadly, this rarely works in real life.
 
Last edited:

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
So Strathfield sells mobile phones as well, are Telstra that worried about that

Seriously David Gallop just f**k OFF
 

big country

Juniors
Messages
1,319
they been negotiating with them since Jan - would've been nice of them to relay this back to the mother ship rather than at a press conference y'day?
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
they been negotiating with them since Jan - would've been nice of them to relay this back to the mother ship rather than at a press conference y'day?
Given it's a small part of their operation, not their entire operation, I don't see that it's as much of a problem. Suppose Brisbane got lucky with WoW being a Telstra dealer though...
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Somebody mentioned the Voda deal for NZW was done prior to the Telstra deal - surely an extension of the agreement has been signed since which NZW wouldn't have had to answer to.

This is truly ridiculous. The NRL is stepping in to deny a club money. Hell, when I think Strathfield, mobiles isn't the first thing that comes into mind, unlike Telstra. Well, to be fair, the first word that comes into my mind when I hear "Telstra" is rip-off.
 

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
Somebody mentioned the Voda deal for NZW was done prior to the Telstra deal - surely an extension of the agreement has been signed since which NZW wouldn't have had to answer to.

This is truly ridiculous. The NRL is stepping in to deny a club money. Hell, when I think Strathfield, mobiles isn't the first thing that comes into mind, unlike Telstra. Well, to be fair, the first word that comes into my mind when I hear "Telstra" is rip-off.

never a truer sentence spoken
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
Seriously the NRL should f**k off with this sponsorship bullsh*t. Let the club's operate themselves. FFS no wonder there's no money in the game.
If Telstra pulled the plug there would be a lot less money.
Maybe Strathfileld can promise not to promote Optus.
Describing Telstra as a rip off isn't the way to describe a company that pours bucket loads of money into Rugby League imo.
By the way I believe Optus is a backer of AFL and has given nothing to NRL for the last ten years.
 
Last edited:

big country

Juniors
Messages
1,319
Given it's a small part of their operation, not their entire operation, I don't see that it's as much of a problem. Suppose Brisbane got lucky with WoW being a Telstra dealer though...

well, looks like they got themselves a rather large problem now? personally i think sponsorhip is a MAJOR part of a football clubs operation
 

GB!

Juniors
Messages
1,222
harden up fairies, same thing happened to manly with a betting agency sponsor.
we didn't get it and ended up in hot water.... literally!
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Maybe you should learn to read. I'm saying being an Optus dealer is not the focus of Strathfield's operations. Yes it's part of it, but they aren't like a Crazy Johns where their #1 objective is to sell Vodafone mobiles.
 

Latest posts

Top