What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL's warning: Brett Stewart saga will cost Manly

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/sport/nrl/story/0,26746,25162496-5003409,00.html
NRL's warning: Brett Stewart saga will cost Manly

By Andrew Webster | March 09, 2009 11:00pm

MANLY'S public shame over the Brett Stewart scandal is set to translate into a six-figure fine from the NRL.

With the premiers reeling over sexual assault allegations levelled at their star fullback by a 17-year-old girl, it has emerged they could be heavily slugged for the boozy season launch earlier in the day of the alleged incident.

NRL chief executive David Gallop expects a report from Manly boss Grant Mayer today and the league has already launched its own investigation.

Those inquiries have so far revealed that Manly co-owner Max Delmege slapped his credit card on the bar at the Wharf Hotel when the official part of the function had ended.

Bar staff refused to accept the card and serve more drinks to their party, citing the Responsible Service of Alcohol guidelines. Later in the evening, Anthony Watmough allegedly assaulted a club sponsor while tewart is said to have been refused service at a number of Manly establishments before the alleged incident with the teenage girl outside a North Manly apartment block. He has not been charged.

"There are some serious questions being thrown up about how alcohol was managed at that function," Gallop said.

"It's part of our system that clubs can be held liable in circumstances where they have not put measures in place to ensure alcohol-fuelled incidents don't damage the image of the game. We are not going to tolerate bad behaviour at team functions - at a public function - where there has been irresponsible drinking."

How much the Sea Eagles will be fined remains unclear, but there are provisions under the NRL's code of conduct to issue sanctions of up to $1 million.

The Bulldogs were fined $500,000 for bringing the game into disrepute after a Coffs Harbour woman alleged she was raped by six players in 2004.

The following year, the Knights were slugged $100,000 with the same amount suspended after several of their players went on a dorm-room romp after a pre-season game at Bathurst.

Mayer described the behaviour of some players at the function as "unacceptable".

"Of course, you second guess yourself but for the time I've been at the club it has been applauded for our off-field performance and attitude and culture and there was no reason to believe anything like this could happen," he said. "You look back and and perhaps it wasn't a great decision and there's no doubt the drinking that took place on Friday was unacceptable."

Gallop dismissed calls for a blanket alcohol ban across the code, arguing it was unrealistic.

The NRL boss was contacted personally by Premier Nathan Rees, who commended him on the league's alcohol and sex relations awareness program.
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
i just find it so weird coz as i said in another thread, at the beaver tribute dinner they were totally forbidden to even have a sip of booze.
 

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
so will they offer bail Manly out if they get into financial trouble like they did with Cronulla
 

>zuzu<

Juniors
Messages
714
He's got a point lol

I think this wont be nowhere near as big as the 500,000 fine given out by the Gallop in 2004. The Dane Tilse incident of 2005 at the Knights sounds like around the amount they will be fined, considering it was just the 2 players who were caught, and 1 eventually sacked.
 
Messages
15,450
so will they offer bail Manly out if they get into financial trouble like they did with Cronulla

We enquired in getting some of next years annual grant brought forward if we needed to do so. That is all that has happened. So what's with the bailout garbage?
 
Messages
12,683
New developments....apparently he tackled the girl.

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25163610-5001021,00.html
I was too drunk to remember anything, says Brett Stewart

By Josh Massoud and Paul Kent
March 10, 2009 12:00am
MANLY fullback Brett Stewart was so drunk he cannot remember allegedly attacking a teenage girl but witnesses claim the footballer had to be pulled off the 17-year-old.
Police witnesses told The Daily Telegraph Stewart exited the taxi that had ferried him home from Manly's season launch and crash tackled the girl. Shocked onlookers said they had to pull him off the girl, who had been smoking a cigarette outside her home.
The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place.
Sources close to the inquiry revealed Stewart had consumed so much alcohol beforehand that he was unable to recall details of the alleged incident when taken into custody by police about 8pm last Friday.
Gallery: Photo timeline of the controversy
When asked to confirm the allegations, his lawyer Geoff Bellew replied: "I am unable to comment about that because it's a matter of client privilege." But Mr Bellew denied suggestions Stewart had declined to be interviewed because he was too drunk. "That's absolutely, totally wrong," he said.
Stewart has since denied allegations that he sexually assaulted the girl at a North Manly apartment complex.
James Phelps: Ban the boofheads, not the beer
As the investigation continues, it emerged the Sea Eagles are also considering defying the NRL's wishes and a groundswell of public opinion by playing Stewart - even if he is charged by police.
Chief executive Grant Mayer refused to comment on his future yesterday. "There's no doubt that if things progress throughout the week the board will meet and discuss it. At this stage it is an allegation," he said.
Convicted fraudster: Girl's dad at centre of smear campaign
Privately, the club has already sought legal opinion and was told the NRL has no legal standing to ban Stewart from playing.
If charged, it is understood the Sea Eagles are prepared to continue playing him until he faces court, as other players have done in the past.
The NRL's stance on whether players should be stood down depends heavily on the players response to the accusations - in this instance, Stewart has denied the accusation.
Sponsors counting the cost of scandal
NRL boss David Gallop said: "If it was a clearly established fact that a player had committed a sexual assault he would not be playing."
Stewart declined to be interviewed after being arrested and was released without charge.
The 24-year-old had spent the entire afternoon at Manly's 2009 season launch, where he was spotted drinking heavily with team mates.
Manly to ban grog at club functions
He returned to the complex - where he also lives - in a taxi about 7.30pm. The girl and her father, both of whom cannot be named for legal reasons, have said she was smoking a cigarette at the front of the complex when Stewart arrived.
Stewart was later arrested and taken to Dee Why police station. He made his first appearance since Friday at Manly training yesterday.
Full coverage of Brett Stewart affair in our Manly Special section
Sea Eagles coach Des Hasler will today name him at fullback for Saturday clash against the Bulldogs.
His on-going selection comes as the Balmain Tigers stood down five NSW Cup players who allegedly raped a 23-year-old woman on the Sunshine Coast after a trial match two Saturday ago. The Daily Telegraph understands all five players have been put on ice until the outcome of the investigation.

So he's practicing his weak tackling technique on teeanged girls now? I'd like to see him do that to a back rower. People with diabetes shouldn't drink.
 

Inferno

Coach
Messages
18,320
so will they offer bail Manly out if they get into financial trouble like they did with Cronulla

The only offer they extended to us, which they extended to all clubs was an advance on this years grant, so the offer's already on the table.
 

macavity

Referee
Messages
20,630
on that rendition it sounds like assault, not sexual assault.

hardly "rape"

unless he grabbed her somewhere he shouldn't have..... though no mention of that.

sounds like there could be an RSA issue in there somewhere too...
 

Pierced Soul

First Grade
Messages
9,202
tackling and sexual assault are two vastly different things....

lucky locky wasnt done for sexual assault udner these pretenses....
 

Latest posts

Top