The Great Dane
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,960
You've totally missed my point. I'm not making any comment on the perceived quality of the product.Sorry but this is nothing like the AFLW. The AFLW went after quantity over quality from day 1 and is mostly a substandard product. Until the current admin came along the NRLW was about quality.
The NRLW is a competition that doesn't need to be successful in it's own right to survive, that has had the supposed demand for it totally artificially boosted by corporate interests, and only exists to appease political forces; exactly like the AFLW.
If anything it's worse than the AFLW frankly, at least they've proven they can get people to show up to matches without bundling it into the price of an AFL ticket.
'Needed' is a strong word, I don't think any entertainment product is truly needed, but as I said before I agree that there is potential in a national women's league.Have they got the timing right, maybe maybe not, but women's RL is by far the fastest growing part of the game and this competition is needed.
However, the way they've gone about it has doomed it to be a loss making opening act for the NRL that is unable to build it's own fan base independent of the NRL because of it's reliance on it for it's existence.
Again you've missed my point, the fact that it was married to the NRL clubs at all is a mistake.In terms of being Sydney centric, the only teams that have applied and not granted a license were Sydney teams.
As far as tacking it onto the NRL I think its important to give it that exposure and a combination of stand alone and NRL openers is the best way to go
Nobody who was building a national competition from scratch would have 9 teams in Sydney, so in what world does it make sense to burden a brand new competition with that ball and chain? It's just a bloody stupid thing to do. And how has the exposure from being linked to the NRL worked out for the NRLW? What less than a thousand fans showing up early to watch most games, and most of them aren't really there for the NRLW anyway.
I mean what percentage of the crowd do you reckon paid the price of admission to watch the NRLW? It has to be significantly less than 1%.
Here's the reality; if you ever want the NRLW to be a successful product in it's own right then it needs to appeal to an audience that is willing to spend money specifically on it, not have it given to them effectively for free as part and parcel of another product that they are interested in, and that simply doesn't describe the vast majority of the NRL audience. However if you market the NRLW as a separate product, that targets a slightly different audience, then you could (and IMO would) build it it's own fanbase that is big enough to support it in it's own right.
Last edited: