taste2taste
Bench
- Messages
- 2,795
Tonight’s dogs v bris game would have been a ripper.
shame all the best players aren’t playing.
shame all the best players aren’t playing.
While the payments for origin are 10x higher than international no one’s picking Samoa or Tonga.Effectively forcing players to choose between NSW/Qld or Tonga/Samoa would only do damage to the international game.
100% agree. It would have been a must watch game if both teams were at full strength.Tonight’s dogs v bris game would have been a ripper.
shame all the best players aren’t playing.
They might try for 2 less rounds in the new tv deal$$$$$.
Gotta wait for more teams to be introduced. We will cut rounds but probably not until team 20 I think.
Effectively forcing players to choose between NSW/Qld or Tonga/Samoa would only do damage to the international game.
That happens when Laurie Daley is coach. It’s crazy the difference between him as a player and as a coach.
Best coaches like Bellamy and Bennett were averagish players.It's very rare for great players, in any sport, to wind up becoming great coaches in that sport. More often than not, they wind up being poor coaches.
Yep. You’ve already complained about it. It’s what you do best.100% agree. It would have been a must watch game if both teams were at full strength.
At least I have the NRLW to watch this weekend.
You think millions tune in because there is nothing better to watch/do on a Wed night?I do think this thread shows, again, a major issue with the NRL.
A large portion of the fanbase are completely change averse. Even talking about potential ways to improve both Origin and the NRL season proper generate howls of derision or just straight up resistance.
Origin hasn't evolved with the rest of the NRL, except to devolve further into a teledrama, and it risks becoming a sideshow. TV audiences only matter as far as they matter, what else is there to watch on a Wednesday night for a footy fan?
You think millions tune in because there is nothing better to watch/do on a Wed night?
Thats very very reductive
FTR, if a viable alternative were to be presented I doubt many would have a problem with tweaking the format or timing etc. However most "solutions" presented tend to then create more issues than they solve when it comes to Origin
I have called for it to die but I want a slow natural death where it just becomes less and less relevant.I'm not sure why you would consider I believe that's the only reason. But it's definitely a factor, and it's a factor in why viewing numbers stay high even when the game sucks. I think it's pretty reasonable to say that numbers will remain high even if the quality continues to drop because footy fans are in the habit of watching Origin.
It's not so much that it's the reason they watch now, as it is what's going to take them away from watching if the way it's scheduled is changed a bit?
I don't think anyone in this thread has called for it to be scrapped or even moved anyway, but one of the immediate responses was but but the TV numbers and I don't think it's as valid a point as some others seem to.
Samoa has played the 2023 Pacific Championships and toured England since the 2022 World Cup, 4 tests in total.Right now the rules make sense because Samoa has only played twice since the 2022 World Cup
This guys gets itThe NRL will soon have clubs in four states and two other countries.
If in twenty years the 'Pinnacle' of the sport is a provincial three game exhibition the expansion efforts failed.
I think it would be good to have the Tongan and Samoa boys snub Origin for their nation. Representing your country should be the pinnacle of our sport anyway. The players who are left playing Origin will be elevated in status and experience, raising their profile.While the payments for origin are 10x higher than international no one’s picking Samoa or Tonga.
if we have a Sam v Tonga series during an origin break where’s the appeal with the 10 best players missing ?
That's right. The hope is that Rugby league growth goes far beyond NSW and QLDThe NRL will soon have clubs in four states and two other countries.
If in twenty years the 'Pinnacle' of the sport is a provincial three game exhibition the expansion efforts failed.
You would still have 80% of the comp not playing.As some others have pitched I'd love to see a three week representative period. It seems to be the best of both worlds as the fans of international rugby league feel like there should be more games played throughout the year and it'd fix teams being disadvantaged by Origin.
For example if this weekend we had something like this all in Sydney how much more exciting would it be?
Thursday - Cook Islands Vs Lebanon
Friday - Fiji Vs Samoa, Australia Prime Ministers XIII (Featuring the best players not picked for Origin) Vs Papua New Guinea
Saturday - U19 Origin followed by Women's Origin followed by Men's Origin.
Sunday: New Zealand Vs Tonga
---
These games don't just need to be international friendlies, you could have tournaments or World Cup qualifiers during this time and it'd be a great attraction for NRL fans as not only do you have the incentive of going to Origin but you also have all these big star players playing in the supporting games.
From a business standpoint it's more games to sell to local government and TV networks, the fans are happy and the players get to keep busy and represent something aside from their club during this time period also.