Why don’t you engage honestly?
Why do you ignore detail and facts?
Why do you talk in meaningless generalisations?
Why do you constantly engage in diversionary tactics when people unpack and expose your loosely formed ideas?
I’m open to the idea that there is merit in some of what you are suggesting but you seem to lack the intellect and attention to detail that’s needed to convey your messages.
In my world I consume mainstream media and independent media and form my own views after analysing both. In analysing it I understand their motives and apply a healthy dose of cynicism to anything I consume.
By parroting shit and not demonstrating the ability to critically analyse issues you come across as brainwashed and hence why you are dismissed by others as a lunatic.
That said, you’ve become one of my favourite posters on here. You spice things up! If you ignore my advice and continue what you are doing that’s cool as well.
Look this all started with the ban of meat for 14 cities article and how it is not something the C40 are perusing actively and more a suggestion or run it up the flag pole and have ideas or discussions about it or whatever.
So yeah how do I prove something they aren't publicly saying that they are categorically and actively going after to do right now? No one can, but as we know, that's how almost all these things work. They form groups, associations, clubs, think tanks or societies and write papers, public announcements, forums, presentations or symposiums and tell the world what is likely to happen down the road and say things like we don't know exactly how things will pan out, but it is inevitable that this or some version of this(insert the idea-plan) will happen. And as with almost all these things that we as a society never really get a say in or a vote since they are so radical and destructive to our current way of life, we are told it is absolutely necessary and vital we get it done because of climate change and or over population and or another pandemic.
We used to have public debates and let the public decide the merits or otherwise on these sorts of society altering ideas, but now we barely ever do and if we do it the side against is stacked with the worst and lamest candidates to put up a proper case. But mostly they don't debate anymore, they just discuss with like minded people or tell you what will be happening or what they plan of eventually doing be a certain time frame.
I mean look at man made climate change, now you probably believe in it right? Well I absolutely don't. You may think I am a lunatic, but I think you and everyone else that has fallen for that nonsense is a lunatic. So where do we go with that? You will cite that, what is it 99% of scientist say it's real and that the science is settled? But I say that there is no way on Gods green earth that 99% of scientist agree and the science is anything but settled.
Also look at the covid and the vaccine. You may say it is safe but I would say in my opinion it is the most dangerous and harmful vaccine/drug ever released on a global scale against humanity.
On both these issues we can argue both points of view by citing different news report, papers, videos etc. that are seemingly equally and legitimately supported. So what do we do? Who is right and who is wrong? I mean both these things can't be right and wrong at the same time, so which is right?
Well I look for patterns and trends and also look at history to make my mind up one way or the other on who would most likely be telling something closer to the truth. So lets look at it for a second. Historically power ALWAYS wants more power and once obtained never gives it up willingly or without some major intervention that can seize it away form whoever has hold of it. On that I think most of us can agree right? So we have an unelected EU that runs and makes more than 85% of all the decisions and laws that the member States must adhere to. Add to that that we have an America that, I'll just pick from 9/11 onwards, that what within a week of that event passed the Patriot Act and all those goodies within it just waiting to be let loose on its citizens.
So combine just those two things, an unelected Governing body ruling Europe and an America that has been slowly descending into lawless chaos run by a political class and a Corporate elite that only want what benefits them and their agendas, who or what is looking after our, the peoples interests?
Like I said power only wants more power, and no matter what its representatives says to the population it purports to be protecting and providing for, we all know that that is an out and out lie and always has been and always will be.
So historically we humans have always had an elite class and a servant class. As an example serfdom in the middle ages. Then we had renaissance and discovered the Americas, combine democracy in the mix and the Jeannie was out of the bottle. But other than the last 200-300 years or so man and societies have never been free. The elites have always run roughshod over the rest of us. So when I then read books or exerts from them, papers, lectures, public forums, discussions or whatever other medium that they themselves have written or presented that tell us all what they are planning and or working towards or when they crystal ball it and give their thoughts on what the future holds, I take note and listen. I find what they say a lot more compelling then anything anyone here may say, no matter what they site, because it is coming from the people that have all the power or their representatives.
And the common theme is a much discussed and necessary massive population control program and the loss of all of our civil rights and liberties, ultimately ushering in a world order of total oppression abject misery for 99% of the people left and only made possible if we buy into the immanent threat of a man made climate change and a possible new pandemic, which they are linking to climate change as well.
Continue next post...
