- Messages
- 78,394
1880-1910 - Temp goes down, CO2 creeps up - No correlation;
1910 - 1940 - Temp shoots up while CO2 barely moves (remember, we haven't Industrialised yet) - No correlation;
1940-1970 - Temp goes down, CO2 starts to climb a bit - No correlation;
1970-2000 - Both rise at a decent rate, as I stated originally;
2000 onwards - Temps flatten while CO2 climbs - No correlation.
Thanks for taking the time to prove my point, Gronk.
As you can now see, a pattern existed before CO2 could have had an effect on the climate (which would be around 1980) - 30 years down, 30 years up, 30 years down, 30 years up etc.
Thanks for taking the time to prove my point, Gronk.
Aaaaand thanks for overlooking my point.
You are focusing on snapshots in time and overlooking long term trends. I explained why temperature and CO2 sometimes do not move together.
As a merkin from NASA says ...
These temperature plateaus, or cooling spells, can be attributed to natural climate variability, explains Josh Willis, a climate scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. and a recent recipient of the 2009 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers. "Natural variability refers to naturally-occurring fluctuations or events that change Earth's climate on time scales ranging from years to decades. Big volcanic eruptions, for instance, can cause cooling that lasts for several years. When a volcano erupts, it blasts dust into the upper atmosphere where it reflects sunlight and cools the planet, a bit like a natural umbrella."
He goes on, "There are also all kinds of natural fluctuations that sometimes cause warming, sometimes cooling." Ocean changes, for instance, can have a big impact on the world's temperature. One example that Willis cites is the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a pattern of warmer and cooler surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean that can last between 10 and 30 years.
Another important example is El Niño, which is an abnormal warming of surface ocean waters in the eastern tropical Pacific that happens every three to eight years and can affect global temperatures for a year or two. Between 1997 and 1998, there was an unusually strong El Niño, and this caused 1998 to be one of the hottest years on record (Figure 1). When Easterling and Wehner dropped the 1998 temperature spike from the data altogether, and zoomed in on the readings from 1999 to 2008, they saw a strong warming trend over this period. But when the 1998 measurement is included in the data, it looks as if there is no overall warming between 1998 and 2008 at all.
The authors say that it is easy to 'cherry-pick' a period to reinforce a particular point of view. "Claims that global warming is not occurring that are derived from a cooling observed over short time periods ignore natural variability and are misleading."
What you have to look at, says Willis, is the long-term temperature readings that have been collected over the past century — which is exactly what Easterling and Wehner do in their study. Over that sort of time scale, global warming becomes apparent from observations of both our atmosphere and our ocean, which are intimately linked pieces of the climate puzzle.
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/175/the-ups-and-downs-of-global-warming/