OT: Current Affairs and Politics

[JokerEel]

I bet you were captain of your debating team ?
Yeah telling fibs doesn't get you anywhere in a discussion either.

The Mas debating team

Telling fibs is what you lefties do best though

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

There are literally 10,000 articles written by merkins who have political science for breakfast on that topic. Have you been alseep Snow White ?

Vladimir Putin: The rebuilding of ‘Soviet’ Russia

The world was stunned when Russia invaded Crimea, but should it have been, asks author and journalist Oliver Bullough.

www.bbc.com

Read it again in context.

I think you need much better sources Gronky.

If you think you know more than or are smarter than Noam Chomsky, I can’t help you.

He would eat your ivory tower Prince Charming merkins for breakfast.

I see you’re on the BBC teat. There’s many sources of news and information.

You won’t entertain rational thinking about it or new ways of looking at the problem.

1 million casualties, bombs and people being killed everywhere and you want to ramp up the stakes?

That’s too irrational and radical a position to entertain seriously.

You can hazard a guess that Vlad isn’t going to deploy tactical nukes, that’s all fine, but as I’ve said, his conduct so far suggests the exact opposite.

And if you’ve read any of the literature or watched any documentaries on nuclear arms or war…. Once deployed or launched, they are difficult to turn back.

What happens if nuclear weapons are used?

What is the impact of a detonated nuclear weapon? Just one can have a fatal impact globally.

www.icanw.org

 

[Gronk]

I think you need much better sources Gronky.

If you think you know more than or are smarter than Noam Chomsky, I can’t help you.

He would eat your ivory tower Prince Charming merkins for breakfast.

I see you’re on the BBC teat. There’s many sources of news and information.

You won’t entertain rational thinking about it or new ways of looking at the problem.

1 million casualties, bombs and people being killed everywhere and you want to ramp up the stakes?

That’s too irrational and radical a position to entertain seriously.

Once again you replied to a different post. You asked about Putin’s woody for the Soviet (re)union.

Mr Chomsky is big on Ukraine/Nato being provocative. He conveniently omitted the annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Interesting is his thoughts on the doomsday clock here with Piers. He says we are closer now because of Putin AND the ignorance surrounding climate change. Your hero who gets the keys to the USA and the LNP here both thumb their noses at that shit.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

It’s a fib to claim that antagonising the ruskies by sending more shite to the ukkies will suddenly result in Vlad putting up his hands, apologising and withdrawing from the Ukraine/crimea.

All of the evidence says the situation is the exact opposite.

The Cold War was over 30 years ago Snow White.

1 million casualties to prove a point.

That’s sad Gronky.

Im a Penny Wong fan, not dutto.

 

[Suitman]

The Cold War was over 30 years ago Snow White.

So why is Putin trying to revitalise it?
Why would he invade what was a peaceful country?
Yes, there are a million dead and that is catastrophic.
Zelensky is defending his homeland which has been invaded by a continually hostile country.
No concessions should be made to Putin.
The whole of Europe's peace, and indeed, the worlds, is in danger, and there is only one man responsible for that.
Putin is the 2020's version of Hitler.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Well don’t smugly dismiss science. I posted a 100 page pdf explanation from imminent scientists explaining the nuances of gender, sex, hormones and I don’t care if you lot a) attribute it to something that I made up on the shitter, or b) quibble like Pou did by focusing on a small aspect of a meme that he didn’t like, because it demonstrates to me that you only made a momentary glance at what I posted or purposely went down the stawman route.

Unscientific FFS. LMAO

Word salad.

 

[JokerEel]

Well don’t smugly dismiss science. I posted a 100 page pdf explanation from imminent scientists explaining the nuances of gender, sex, hormones and I don’t care if you lot a) attribute it to something that I made up on the shitter, or b) quibble like Pou did by focusing on a small aspect of a meme that he didn’t like, because it demonstrates to me that you only made a momentary glance at what I posted or purposely went down the stawman route.

Unscientific FFS. LMAO

Science says their are 2 sexes trust science

 

[Gronk]