JokerEel
Coach
- Messages
- 14,942
he will be either the next treasurer or opposition leader
What's he doing now?
he will be either the next treasurer or opposition leader
Do you think anyone on either side gives a rat's about the NDIS?
I could have done it for $10m
24 million![]()
My question remains "Do you think anyone on either side gives a rat's about the NDIS?" All of the above is in the past, now is now.The NDIS was introduced by the Gillard government. In that government Albo held a senior ministerial portfolio and was Leader of the House (managing shit and ensuring legislation passed). At the time, she led a minority government and it was Albo who secured the cross bench support.
![]()
Not all, but from my perspective he's better than the alternative. But I only get 1 vote and you know as well as me that PM's get blamed for all sorts of shit that's out of their control.
I'll tell you what I really think the Labour Party has f**ked up and that's NDIS reform and that's coming from personal experience as someone who works in the sector.
Agreed.major reform was needed.
There's definitely something not right there. One of my jobs is to manage budgets and coordinate providers and that sounds very very odd.A bloke I know who has a $100 000 annual allocation could only get a few pairs of shoes, a pair of glasses and a mattress out of them over 2 yrs.
Yes there's some rorting. A lot of waste and duplication too. Just some of the reform measures put into place are either window dressing or have had negative unintended consequences. The whole scheme got too big too quickly.There was and probably still is soooo much rorting of that NDIS that reforms were highly necessary
Do you reckon that Dutton gives a rats about the NDIS ?
It sure did. The bloke I know who is on it shares the same first name with his previous case managers workmate. His previous case manager accidentally sent him a text saying if you give me (insert name here) account, I will buy you a brand new Mercedes and reiterated that they were deadly serious. Geez it must have open to some spectacular rorting.Agreed.
There's definitely something not right there. One of my jobs is to manage budgets and coordinate providers and that sounds very very odd.
Yes there's some rorting. A lot of waste and duplication too. Just some of the reform measures put into place are either window dressing or have had negative unintended consequences. The whole scheme got too big too quickly.
The NDIA allowed many people to self manage their funding, as opposed to invoices getting paid directly through the NDIA. There was no oversight and no accountability. Not everyone did the wrong thing, but some went to town. It makes me sad because the scheme is so needed and when it works it can make a massive difference to a disabled person's quality of life.It sure did. The bloke I know who is on it shares the same first name with his previous case managers workmate. His previous case manager accidentally sent him a text saying if you give me (insert name here) account, I will buy you a brand new Mercedes and reiterated that they were deadly serious. Geez it must have open to some spectacular rorting.
Anyway, good to know people like you have been bought in to clean it up.
Getting a free lunch is one thing and I'd do it myself but a bloody Merc. Jeeeezuz.
*was turned intoNDIS has turned into a rorting system unfortunately
I hear what your saying but I believe the self management was bought in to counter the systemic rorting by the providers themselves.The NDIA allowed many people to self manage their funding, as opposed to invoices getting paid directly through the NDIA. There was no oversight and no accountability. Not everyone did the wrong thing, but some went to town. It makes me sad because the scheme is so needed and when it works it can make a massive difference to a disabled person's quality of life.
That’s not entirely correct and I should have been clearer in saying that self management allowed providers to access funding easier and with less oversight. It’s also far for the only problem. Anyway it’s a mess that needs fixing no doubt about that.I hear what your saying but I believe the self management was bought in to counter the systemic rorting by the providers themselves.
A small oversight committee with harsh penalty for corruption should be all that it takes to stamp it out. The savings to the Aussie taxpayer would be enormous.That’s not entirely correct and I should have been clearer in saying that self management allowed providers to access funding easier and with less oversight. It’s also far for the only problem. Anyway it’s a mess that needs fixing no doubt about that.
*was turned into
*...by providers (business owners) who are sadly in it for $$$ maximising profit, rather than giving decent service for reasonable profit
I think you can take his predictions, and those of every other economist, with a grain of salt.So you think he is or isn't making shit up ?
All he did was post economic fundamentals.
Surely the dumbest of merkins would understand that a deduction in fuel costs has a massive effect on cost of everything that requires transportation ... which is literally everything.rewarding driving gas guzzling cars over working - could pay off
That's fair. Sheargold's Matildas gibber was about as funny as a fart in an elevator, but I surprised at the cancelling given some of the other dreadful shit that other 'shock jocks' get away with.Definitely not Sandilands. Last I read he proposed on his show that he get a girl on who would bend over and a man would slip his dick in. She would then need to work out if he was her boyfriend or her Dad.
[Meanwhile the guy from MMM gets cancelled bc he said lightweight comedy stuff about the Matildas and Endometriosis.]
But sounds like a preachy Kermit the Frog which is why he is unlikeable.No he has an impressive salad.