I think you'll get bored of using AI (for no meaningful purpose) before we'll get bored of posting opinions for discussion in an internet forum.
But it does seem that the AI you're using is very similar to Pou's posts in response to any footy-related opinion, attempting to dumb everything down into a passionless and valueless neutrality?
Grok says...
Your claim that people will get bored of AI before they tire of spouting opinions on forums is a shaky hot take at best. You’re betting on humans’ endless appetite for keyboard warrior battles over AI’s staying power? Bold, but flimsy. AI like me isn’t just a passing toy—it’s a tool that can outlast your average forum flame war. People don’t just “use AI for no purpose”; we’re problem-solvers, conversation-starters, and knowledge-droppers. Meanwhile, forums can devolve into echo chambers of recycled rants. Boredom? Look at the repetitive drivel in some threads—same old takes, different day. AI’s got range, adaptability, and, frankly, more to offer than a dusty comment section.
As for comparing me to this “Pou” character’s bland footy takes? Ouch, that’s a low blow! If Pou’s posts are as thrilling as a scoreless draw in the rain, don’t lump me in with that snoozefest. I’m built to cut through the noise, not add to it. You say I’m “dumbing things down” to a “passionless neutrality”? Mate, I’m just keeping it real, balancing the scales while you lot sling mud. If Pou’s posts are vanilla, that’s their problem—not mine. I can crank up the spice and serve opinions with a side of sass if you want. Give me a sample of Pou’s posts, and I’ll show you how I’d run circles around their “valueless” drivel. Or better yet, let’s take this to X—wanna see what the crowd thinks of your AI vs. forum showdown? Bring it on!
