OT: Current Affairs and Politics

[JohnStoppafarty]

What a brilliant idea.

Switzerland to Vote on Capping Population at 10 Million - The New York Times https://share.google/apwH3w4oFVPht0HRq

Very smart. It's obvious the world is overpopulated. I don't disagree with my foes about that.
Imagine if countries offered tax breaks to people to get irreversibly sterilised and a tax tier that increased per child.
Just a thought It's anti capitalism though, so.. you know.

 

[JokerEel]

What a brilliant idea.

Switzerland to Vote on Capping Population at 10 Million - The New York Times https://share.google/apwH3w4oFVPht0HRq

Capping it till 2050..

Always my point is if we are supposed to cut emissions (net zero...)we should cap our population.

We also have hospitals that have people waiting 2 days for a bed but we still increase population.

 

[Suitman]

What a brilliant idea.

Switzerland to Vote on Capping Population at 10 Million - The New York Times https://share.google/apwH3w4oFVPht0HRq

Switzerland is a fraction of the size of NSW.

Australia is about 188 times bigger than Switzerland​

Therefore, Switzerland's idea of capping their population to 10 million is the same as Australia capping ours to 5 billion and 76 million?
Not sure the figures stack up.

 

[Gronk]

I think ideally to get a “good” Liberal, they need to lean way back more to the “Libs are better with money” (and they actually need to start being again) from Howard/Costello.
I think if they became the purely economics party they’d be right back in with the moderates

Spot on says MT.

“If you want to have a ‘who is more lunatic right on immigration etc’ fight with Hanson, then you will lose.” “Labor will be in for an eternity”.

 

[Gronk]

Switzerland is a fraction of the size of NSW.

Switzerland land size in the lower and upper Hunter Valley. That’s it.

 

[JokerEel]

Spot on says MT.

“If you want to have a ‘who is more lunatic right on immigration etc’ fight with Hanson, then you will lose.” “Labor will be in for an eternity”.

What's her policy on immigration?

 

[Bandwagon]

What's her policy on immigration?

Less of it.

 

[Bandwagon]

And yeah, that's the thing. You aint gonna get a detailed policy agenda from ON because all they have is grievance.

 

[JokerEel]

And yeah, that's the thing. You aint gonna get a detailed policy agenda from ON because all they have is grievance.

They aren't in power so good luck getting a detailed policy. Though they do have one on their website.

 

[Gronk]

What's her policy on immigration?

White Australia Policy 2.0

Refuse entry to migrants from nations known to foster extremist ideologies that are incompatible with Australian values and way of life.

Withdraw from the UN Refugee Convention because Australia will not be dictated to by foreign organisations when deciding who we accept into our nation on humanitarian grounds.

So basically, like Trump said, she doesn’t want people from those shit hole countries.

LINK

 

[JokerEel]

White Australia Policy 2.0

Refuse entry to migrants from nations known to foster extremist ideologies that are incompatible with Australian values and way of life.

Withdraw from the UN Refugee Convention because Australia will not be dictated to by foreign organisations when deciding who we accept into our nation on humanitarian grounds.

So basically, like Trump said, she doesn’t want people from those shit hole countries.

LINK

I missed the white Australian part in the link care to send a screen shot?

Yeah what an asshat stopping people coming to Australia from countries with extreme ideologies..


Atleastt we won't have People from the USA here....

 

[Bandwagon]

They aren't in power so good luck getting a detailed policy. Though they do have one on their website.

Do they?

Or are they more "mission statements" . I agree they don't really need them yet, but if they want to be considered as a serious alternative government they'll need them.

And they'll need them to stand up to scrutiny,

 

[JokerEel]

Do they?

Or are they more "mission statements" . I agree they don't really need them yet, but if they want to be considered as a serious alternative government they'll need them.

And they'll need them to stand up to scrutiny,

Yes

 

[Bandwagon]

Yeah what an asshat stopping people coming to Australia from countries with extreme ideologies..

Yes, we should only accept refugees' from good Christian Nations, preferably ones with western values

Like the UK, and The USA

 

[Bandwagon]

Yes

Really, like what.

Which is to say, what policy, how will it be implemented, and how will it work.

 

[JokerEel]

Yes, we should only accept refugees' from good Christian Nations, preferably ones with western values

Like the UK, and The USA

Yep that's what the policy says.

What was that about grievance?

 

[JokerEel]

Really, like what.

Which is to say, what policy, how will it be implemented, and how will it work.

You have Gronk on ignore or just really trying hard?

 

[Bandwagon]

Yep that's what the policy says.

What was that about grievance?

Their policy is a complete dogs breakfast, and I can read into it what ever the f**k I like because it lacks specifics and relies on motherhood statements.

For example whilst it doesn't say what I posted, what it does say is "incompatible with Australian values". So what the f**k is that if not from countries compatible with Australian values, like the UK and The US?

 

[Bandwagon]

You have Gronk on ignore or just really trying hard?

Well no, I'm not asking Gronk, I'm asking you what you think is a detailed policy on their website. If I wanted a pig, I'd rattle a bucket.

 

[JohnStoppafarty]

Yes, we should only accept refugees' from good Christian Nations, preferably ones with western values

Like the UK, and The USA

IT's hard to tell with you where the sarcasm stops and your real position emerges. If this is deliberate, you are doing a great job.