What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Ricky: Why I sacked Kimmorley

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,560
Ricky: Why I sacked Kimmorley
ONE of my beliefs is that you play your football the same way you live your life off the field. They cannot be separated.

So what happened to the Bulldogs on Friday night?
It's no secret my problems with Brett Kimmorley go back to when I dropped him in Origin in 2005. He threw an intercept pass, we lost the game, and I dropped him.

That's how people saw it. Grossly unfair, they said, and many still believe it. The crux of Canterbury's problems on Friday go as far back as then, and possibly further.

And while the hype about Kimmorley's form has glossed over the flaws that were evident then, it's what cost the Bulldogs on Friday. If Matt Orford turned in a performance like Kimmorley did on Friday night the critics would be all over him.

Kimmorley has escaped any criticism.

For the record, his Origin sacking had nothing to do with the intercept.

Nobody ever gets dropped for one mistake. Kimmorley got dropped because four times we got in Queensland territory and, when he ran out of options midway through our sets, he kicked for himself and turned the ball over before we had even got to tackle five. Tackles three and four.

That's what put us in the position to be beaten in extra time. I also told him all week at training I wanted him standing deep to avoid the Steve Price charge-downs.

He said he preferred to stand flat, because he was used to the flat style of attack that was then in fashion. We butted heads until I finally said, do it your way. I was trying to show faith in him.

Three times he got charged down, and each time we were under pressure with Queensland starting a fresh set in good field position.

The intercept excuse is a myth and yet Kimmorley has been happy to let it run. And to be honest, I never cared either way because I knew the truth.
So did he.

I learned then that Kimmorley was not a big-match player - not the kind who can get you over the line in big games, like Andrew Johns or Darren Lockyer. And I knew that when I later moved to Cronulla. We tried our best to work together, but it didn't work.

And given his form this year, people have been saying: "How could the Sharks and Ricky Stuart let Brett Kimmorley go?''

Again I have no problem with that because the media and the fans who pay good money to go to the footy each week are also entitled to their thoughts. But I let Brett Kimmorley go because I didn't think the Sharks could win a premiership while he was here.

His performance on Friday night against Parramatta justified that.

He criticised me in Friday's Daily Telegraph, which I have copped all year.
But I did take exception to him saying he was now at a club that shared a similar "family'' philosophy to him, which is why I respond today. That deeply offended my players who, all year, played under tremendous adversity but never once whinged or dogged it.

A couple of Bulldogs players texted me on Friday asking why he would do this to them on their big day. I had no answer, but it showed me that they were distracted by it. And showed me what I know. On the day of the biggest game of his team's year, Kimmorley was about himself.

That's why my board clapped the night I told them I had released Kimmorley. One sponsor was very, very happy. Two years ago, I offered Brett one of the biggest contracts in Cronulla history over three years.

I was obviously keen for him to stay because you don't get rid of a player unless you have a better one to replace him, and at the time Trent Barrett was not an option. So I was pressing his manager George Mimis for a decision. At the same time, George was trying to do the best for his client and was in the UK shopping him around to Super League clubs. This went on for a couple of weeks and I couldn't get a decision, so I had to start thinking about other options. I kept the offer on the table for Brett - but reduced it by $100,000. He eventually signed.

Then last year he again started shopping himself around the UK. It was obvious he didn't want to be at Cronulla, so I made the call that he could move on.

He spoke to the Bulldogs and another couple of clubs before settling on Belmore. His Friday night performance just told me everything I know. From the poor kicks that failed to put any pressure on Parramatta to the lack of leadership midway through the second half when the Dogs were desperate for it.

You only have to sit and ask yourself what Johns or Lockyer would have been doing in similar circumstances. I have said all along that players can play well all season, but it's the big games at the end of the season that really count.

Let's not forget we finished equal first last year, with Kimmorley as our playmaker, and then got knocked out of the comp in the same game Canterbury did on Friday.

To win finals you need big-game players, and nothing I have seen lately has changed my mind on that. He has enjoyed his footy there and had a good season. Good luck to him.

The Bulldogs have done a wonderful rebuild this year and Kevin Moore, Todd Greenberg and the players deserve every bit of credit that has come their way.

But it was there for all to see at a packed ANZ Stadium on Friday night, the very reason I chose to let him go. Sure, his form all season has been consistently good, but in the game that mattered most, I think Brett would be the first to admit he didn't deliver what his club wanted.
http://www.nospam25.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=71861
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
66,913
ouch

cant really fault anything Sticky has said there, great return of serve after what Kimmorely dished out to him a few days back
 

IFR33K

Coach
Messages
17,043
I always hated Sticky, and this just proves it. The guy has already won a premiership, and it was quiet clear that he was still injured Friday night. Talk about sticking the boot in, when he is already down.

Fancy that, saying he isn't a big game player, then going on to replace him with Barrett. The most stupidest move ever.
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
Ricky Stuart... biggest ego in the game.

Cronulla would have done a lot better with Kimmorley instead of Barrett this season. They would have done better still without Stuart as coach.
 
Messages
984
I don't pretend to know the full story so won't comment on who is wrong or right.

But enjoyable read nonetheless.

One thing though: Kimmorely was indeed sh*thouse for that Origin series - I remember him putting in a nothing kick early in the tackle count screaming at the TV, and that pass . . . <shudders>
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,234
Where did Kimmorley criticise Stuart on Friday? Anyone have a link/quote?

Don't tell me Stuart took Kimmorley saying "bulldogs share a similar family philosophy to me" as the insult that sparked this. lol
 

Casper The Ghost

First Grade
Messages
9,924
Absolutely agree. Won his Premiership on the back of the legendary Graham Murray. Stuart himself is a hack coach.

But I'll also agree with this. Was also one of the reasons I loved Fitzy. I just love a good stoush.

You mean Chris Anderson??????

Have you taken your pills on time lately HJ????

I recommend this for you HJ :lol::lol::lol:

VACCINE MANUFACTURERS 'PIONEERING' MICRO-CHIPPING OF HUMANS

Forgetful patients to be fitted with microchips to remind them to take their pills

By Ryan Kisiel
22nd September 2009
Mail On Line.co.uk

Patients will be fitted with a microchip in their shoulder to remind them to take their medicine, under a new scheme being developed by a drugs company.

Older people will be given pills containing a harmless microchip that sends a signal to the chip in the shoulder when the pill is taken.

But if the pill is not taken by the forgetful patient, the chip in the shoulder will then send a text to a carer or the patient to remind them.
article-1215200-068977D1000005DC-124_468x341.jpg
[A microchip could let carers know if a forgetful patient has failed to take their medicine]

Swiss pharmaceutical group Norvatis is developing the electronic pill that it hopes will reduce the number of patients who have to be supervised taking their medicine.

Joe Jiminez, head of pharmaceuticals at Novartis, said tests of the 'chip in the pill' to a shoulder receiver chip had been carried out on 20 patients.
The experiment with a drug that lowers blood pressure had increased the amount of times patients had taken their medicine on time from 30 per cent to 80 per cent in six months.

Drug companies are keen to improve 'compliance' rates among patients as most end up not taking their correct dosages because of unpleasant side effects or a failure to gain symptoms quickly.

Medical companies hope it will reduce the number of hospitalisations from patients whose conditions have deteriorated from not taking their drugs.
Mr Jiminez said: 'This industry is starting to explode.' He added that his company would have to work closely with medical watchdogs and doctors.
Rival drug company Pfizer recently developed an automated system to telephone patients to encourage them to take their medicine.

-----------------

This is no longer from people 'trying' to expose the reality of what is happening - it is now in 'mainstream media'...
Is this how they are trying to 'sell' it to us that this is for our own good?? How long before we are all 'chipped' for total control?
Debra B - 23rd September 2009


How long before they suggest they microchip our children so they don't get lost or kidnapped? And then there is the wealthy! And of course ALL the "Prisoners" and "Law Breakers". What The Hell, Lets Just Do Everybody!!!!! - Gradualism is the name of the game, start with the pets, to soldiers, to the "forgetful" (who is deciding who is forgetful?), to children, to wealthy, etc, etc, to everyone. A microchip could let "The Establishment" know..... everything about you!!!!!!! And why does no one ever question the fact that perhaps all these medicines with "unpleasant side effects" do nothing to heal the body, only to alleviate symptoms and improve the cash flow of the pharmaceutical giants. Isn't it great that all these drugs allow us to take no responsibility for our health - a lifetime of the wrong food and a saturation of chemicals doesn't matter because the doctor will have a pill ready when we start to feel the effects. And as Oli from Solihul is admitting (see comments below) we are a drugged up world of human-beings who must maintain a level of drug intake (top up) or suffer the CON-sequences (sequence of the CON) - Love For Life - 23rd September 2009

Read other comments & article here: http://nospam06.com.au/node/6898

Other articles of interest:

Video: Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccination For All New York Health Care Workers 7th September 2009 2 Minutes 17 Seconds:
http://nospam06.com.au/node/6910

What To Do If You Are Forced To Take Swine Flu Shot by Dr. Russell Blaylock 5th September 2009:
http://nospam06.com.au/node/6896

THE ROARING FORTIES - Hands Up All Those Who Got Their Share Of Uranium Laden Dust Over The Last Few Days by Lyn Stanfield:
http://nospam06.com.au/node/6908

THE SWINE FLU VIRUS IS NOT ONLY A LAB PRODUCED VIRUS BUT ITS A PATENTED PRODUCT FOR MILITARY USE AND FOR PLANNED GENOCIDE:
http://nospam06.com.au/node/6866

Verichip Corporation - Verichip To Develop Sensor Systems To Detect Biological Threats Such As Swine Flu And Other Illnesses:
http://nospam06.com.au/node/6909

See Also: Video/Podcast/Articles/Blog Journalist Jane Burgermeister: Case About Bird Flu Criminal Charges Filed In Austria About Bird Flu: Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder: http://nospam06.com.au/node/6671 and Video: Swine Flu 1976 & Propaganda - The Devastation, The Victims Who Took The Shots Back In 1976 - "WARNING" "WARNING" - 16 Min: http://nospam06.com.au/node/6636 and Bird Flu - Avian Flu - Smallpox - Pandemics - Pestilence - Swine Flu: http://nospam06.com.au/node/2756 and Vaccination: http://nospam06.com.au/node/106 and Chemtrails - Haarp - Morgellons Disease - Scalar Electromagnetic Technology - Weather Wars: http://nospam06.com.au/chemtrails and Mercury: http://www.nospam06.com.au/node/810 and New World Order - NWO = OWN The Planet + Microchiped Population + Police State & Fema Camps Internment & Detention Camps: http://nospam06.com.au/node/3060
 

grapeape

Juniors
Messages
343
great article.

both of them are tossers, but stuart is right.

kimmorley is highly overrated and cant produce when it counts. and hes a f**kwit. watchin him on fox proves that.
 

forward pass

Coach
Messages
10,209
I always felt we were more chance of winning with Noddy playing. Not bagging his ability, but I felt with Noddy at halfback, we would know exactly how they were going to play.

With Holdsworth, it was a bit of an unknown and would have brought Ben Roberts out a bit more.
 
Top