jeez mate I thought we were trying to make the same point lol
Ok sure, if we think sourcing players for a top international team from a country with a population of 100,000 is sustainable then let's go for it I guess
It 100% can be done mate. That Tongan rugby side is about 50% local born and developed to at least school boy age.
For example, each year a rotating NRL club could be assigned to Pacific Island nation where they sign 5 players under 20 that can be salary cap exempt for 5 years.
Poach the best Union guys who dont want to learn Japanese. Hold an NFL style international combine etc. The athletes are there.
If NRl had any sense they'd move to rep weekends and have state of origin and Island of Origin series. 3 matches in NZ mid season between Samoa and Tonga would be awesome and build a massive rivalry that would sell out stadiums over there. Tell the Feds it will keep china out and they will likely fund it as well!
If the crowds are as big as we think they'll be, running a three match series alongside Origin at big stadiums would probably work and with good player payments the Islander players can then be given a choice. Pick and stick, Origin or Tonga v Samoa. You'd probably find most would choose T v S if it's built up to its potential and Origin reverts back to Kangaroo potential players only.If NRl had any sense they'd move to rep weekends and have state of origin and Island of Origin series. 3 matches in NZ mid season between Samoa and Tonga would be awesome and build a massive rivalry that would sell out stadiums over there. Tell the Feds it will keep china out and they will likely fund it as well!
Origin would suffer if all those island players leave Origin so there's no chance they'll change the rules anytime soon. Origin profits the nrl millions of dollars no way they'll do something to weaken itIf the crowds are as big as we think they'll be, running a three match series alongside Origin at big stadiums would probably work and with good player payments the Islander players can then be given a choice. Pick and stick, Origin or Tonga v Samoa. You'd probably find most would choose T v S if it's built up to its potential and Origin reverts back to Kangaroo potential players only.
I don't think it will. I and millions of others will still watch if NSW field Latrell, Lomax, Moses and Barnett etc in the place of To'o, Chrichton, Haas and Luai or if QLD fielded Cobbo, Flegler, Collins and Gilbert instead of Tuilagi, Tino and Nanai.Origin would suffer if all those island players leave Origin so there's no chance they'll change the rules anytime soon. Origin profits the nrl millions of dollars no way they'll do something to weaken it
2 years ago the NRL started a pathways program where the best Tongan schoolboys tours Australia for 2 weeks.You don't think League can do what Union does? Offer their best 15/16 year olds scholarships in a NRL system?
Would the players choosing to play for Samoa and Tongan get paid 30k ? Or 3kI don't think it will. I and millions of others will still watch if NSW field Latrell, Lomax, Moses and Barnett etc in the place of To'o, Chrichton, Haas and Luai or if QLD fielded Cobbo, Flegler, Collins and Gilbert instead of Tuilagi, Tino and Nanai.
The game would gain three extra marquee fixtures which would rate pretty well in Australia (obviously nowhere near Origin ratings), but would help really drive viewership in NZ as well as selling out stadiums like Suncorp, Eden Park and Allianz. Another three asset games for the NRL to sell
Like Origin, it would take time to build the series. But if you are selling out the three games, Aus and NZ TV pay a bit for it (again, not anywhere near the value or origin), State Govts and NZ city councils bid to host matches (large fan base willing to travel for these matches), there's no reason why player payments for the series can't get to say 10k at that point it's large enough anyway. If they are truly passionate about the Tonga and Samoa jersey then you've got your own well paying, well promoted, well viewed series.Would the players choosing to play for Samoa and Tongan get paid 30k ? Or 3k
if not, they are going to choose origin.
samoa v Tonga without their best players doesn’t have as much appeal
They would have T vs S for the women on the same bill I guessLike Origin, it would take time to build the series. But if you are selling out the three games, Aus and NZ TV pay a bit for it (again, not anywhere near the value or origin), State Govts and NZ city councils bid to host matches (large fan base willing to travel for these matches), there's no reason why player payments for the series can't get to say 10k at that point it's large enough anyway. If they are truly passionate about the Tonga and Samoa jersey then you've got your own well paying, well promoted, well viewed series.
On a side note, the women's Origin players are paid 30k per game and WSOO has not built up to a level to justify the pay packet yet, so if Tonga v Samoa can create all the value described above, which is realistic, why shouldn't they get that too?
Magic Round?What’s LA & MR?
One mildly successful pacific championship isn’t going to suddenly change the entire rugby league landscape in Australia. The fact that it got any positive coverage let alone for it to continue at all after the tournament finished is near unheard of for international league. It will take time for things to change though, a few more years of succesful tournaments and maybe even some growth and things might change a bit.So for a week at least after the Pacific Championships final we had some positive Press in regards to the International game. Kangaroo Tour, Crowds, TV ratings, Possible 50,000 crowds etc and now whoomph. Back to talking SOO, LA and MR. So rugby league
What’s LA & MR?