Dave Q
Coach
- Messages
- 11,065
parra pete said::lol: You are a classic Dave. Luv ya work...
I appreciate your kind comments.
You know Pete, we need a spy over on Parra LU!;-)
parra pete said::lol: You are a classic Dave. Luv ya work...
Dave, you speak of personal attacks Im not sure but this thread you started taring all parra supporters with the same brush, mate this no f**king Hallmark card you've begun. Could I ask why you are so pissed off with Parra fans and pardon my ignorance, any chance I could get an answer without a spewing of insults, if not so be it. God bless Dave we are all humans, just support different teams.Dave Q said:Well I'm not wrong Mr boppa, because I gave you the source, me.
There was no low-brow response from the fans as you errantly report either and nothing but a kind whisper from the powers to be.
Despite the post-loss musings of George, Rusty and Phac have been nothing but gentlemenly and most gallant in victory.
What you cant seem to get a grip on is that all parties were well-intended.
That is puzzling for you, I understand, because it is beyond the two-dimensional mental capacity of the eel.
Of course only one party had the plan to reinstate us to our rightful place in this game..above all others and certainly above the swamp dwelling league carnival that consist of you woeful, loutish lot.
And 'tis not me that is misreable, I have merely responded appropriately to the gutter-dwellers who slide around your forum trying to make themselves seem important.
Well they arent important, they are louts like the ones that hang about railway stations at night vandalising public property. People that you dont want your kids to turn into.
And that is the tawdry, ill-conceived, vexatious, wrongful pathetic and wanton attack on the pride of the league, the greatest club in the world, that being South Sydney under cover of your own useless forum where the gutless cats are protected by your on-line rogue mods and misguided admin.
As mentioned, it is beneath us to make a response, but there are times when if we have to stomp on a cockroach to stop an infestation, so be it.
The vomit coming from the eels forum at the moment is a blight on LU and the personal attacks on me and other souths fans well its just disgusting.
big boppa eel said:Dave, you speak of personal attacks Im not sure but this thread you started taring all parra supporters with the same brush, mate this no f**king Hallmark card you've begun. Could I ask why you are so pissed off with Parra fans and pardon my ignorance, any chance I could get an answer without a spewing of insults, if not so be it. God bless Dave we are all humans, just support different teams.
russel doesnt run the club, he is part owner but has limited involvement...number8 said:Russell Crowe! :lol:
Now Boys, tell the player beside you why you love him.... wtf is that???
I don't mind Souths tbh but Crowes a knob! How anyone can give it to Fitzgerald when Russell Crowe runs their club is amazing.
Btw, Fitgerald is a knob too. I don't deny it but giving it to him with Crowe in the Souths head job is a touch hypocritical.
NGR said:yeah a comment that had a threat behind it...
parra has plenty of pubs care to narrow it down...
number8 said:Russell Crowe! :lol:
Now Boys, tell the player beside you why you love him.... wtf is that???
I don't mind Souths tbh but Crowes a knob! How anyone can give it to Fitzgerald when Russell Crowe runs their club is amazing.
Btw, Fitgerald is a knob too. I don't deny it but giving it to him with Crowe in the Souths head job is a touch hypocritical.
Newcastlerabbit said:Fitzgerald wanted to merge your club with Penrith,Balmain and God knows who.:lol: Your leader wanted a 10 team comp.WTF :crazy: He wanted a hybrid game of League and union.:crazy: FFS dont compare Crowe to Fitzgerald.Crowe does things for the betterment of rugby league not only for Souths ,but rugby league in general.Can you say the same for Fitzgerald?
Newcastlerabbit said:Fitzgerald wanted to merge your club with Penrith,Balmain and God knows who.:lol: Your leader wanted a 10 team comp.WTF :crazy: He wanted a hybrid game of League and union.:crazy: FFS dont compare Crowe to Fitzgerald.Crowe does things for the betterment of rugby league not only for Souths ,but rugby league in general.Can you say the same for Fitzgerald?
Newcastlerabbit said:Fitzgerald wanted to merge your club with Penrith,Balmain and God knows who.:lol: Your leader wanted a 10 team comp.WTF :crazy: He wanted a hybrid game of League and union.:crazy: FFS dont compare Crowe to Fitzgerald.Crowe does things for the betterment of rugby league not only for Souths ,but rugby league in general.Can you say the same for Fitzgerald?
The Colonel said:You still dribbling Dave? :lol:
That ego is well fed......
Avenger said:Souths are still garbage
Newcastlerabbit said:Lol,and you still have D.Fitzgerald.:lol:
number8 said:Parramatta have Fitgerald. Who is the Souths CEO at the moment. Who is passing through that job right now because I honestly can't keep track! I'll take Fitzy. I don't mind at all. he says a lot of sh*t but he has never sold the club out & I think he does it more often than not just to get a bite. Which he does.
At the end of the day. Parramatta are still the Eels & we still play Rugby League & we are competitive under the cap with a strong junior base & massive supporter base. Are Souths not chasing players the Eels have developed? Fitzgeralds structures have put us in that position. So I don't mind at all that we have him!
As far as not looking after past greats, some of these blokes are the 1st to give it to an Eels player when he has a bad game. Brett Kenny rights off just about every bloke named in the 6 before he's even taken the field & Price thinks that anyone not as good as himself is lazy! These blokes were not just Eels greats but amoung the greats of the game. Every club has these blokes, amoung the best to lace a boot yet on the outer, & in every case these blokes have played a part in putting themselves there. They could be more gracious in retirment than they are too. It's not all Fitzgerald. It is partly, but not completely.