I know that an underpowered Knights beat an underpowered Panthers last night, however the question needs to be asked that is the team more coherent, and can it be a better team without KP?
I think what last night indicated is:
- We have some great young kids coming through, and does KP’s large salary stop us from keeping them as they come through? Fletcher Hunt is going to be a really good player, but where does he fit in to the future? Where does kids like Connor Votano fit in the next few years when they are ready?
- We really lack some depth in the forwards in the second half which halts our momentum until the starters come back on. Is KP’s money better off spent on that depth rather than paying him more?
- Is KP really the playmaker that we need? Fletcher Sharpe looked great at fullback last night, the halves looked more fluid and effective than at any point over the year. Does those guys doing what KP wants them to do actually stifle them? Are they better off without him?
If he wants to go elsewhere, I tend to think we need the courage to tell him he is free to go. I know it sounds absurd for a team who could end up with the spoon to tell their best player they are free to leave, but is he our best player?