fourplay
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,236
According to the judiciary, playing in a grand final is no different to a round 3 clash vs Souths.
They believe that forcing a player out of a grand final imposes the same penalty as missing 1 game mid season.. or a pre-season trial game.
It defies common sense and logic. Faalogo has been suspended for 7 games now.. He could miss 2 sudden death semi finals, a grand final qualifier, a grand final, test matches and a tour overseas, which won't even count towards his suspension, and still more games next year.
What kind of judiciary system thinks a mid season game has the same worth as a grand final?
This isn't to argue Faalogo's suspension. Its about the absurd notion that a grand final is no different to a mid season clash or a trial game. They have a points/grading system for high tackles so surely they can distinguish between games of differing importance.
They believe that forcing a player out of a grand final imposes the same penalty as missing 1 game mid season.. or a pre-season trial game.
It defies common sense and logic. Faalogo has been suspended for 7 games now.. He could miss 2 sudden death semi finals, a grand final qualifier, a grand final, test matches and a tour overseas, which won't even count towards his suspension, and still more games next year.
What kind of judiciary system thinks a mid season game has the same worth as a grand final?
This isn't to argue Faalogo's suspension. Its about the absurd notion that a grand final is no different to a mid season clash or a trial game. They have a points/grading system for high tackles so surely they can distinguish between games of differing importance.