raiders no-try

[greeneyed]

***

 

[jimmythehand]

On the basis of this ridiculous post, 3457 tries would not have been awarded by the video refs since their introduction.

On what basis would the tries not been awarded?

 

[Bay56]

I thought both the Berrigan and Frawley tries should have been awarded. Though the Frawley try had less doubt than the berrigan try.

Berrigan definitely did not score a try ... I have screen caps up on another forum which very clearly show that Berrigan lost the ball a good 300mm from the line .. it was dragged back out of his hands by Withers and then lifed toards the end of the slide into the in-goal.

dont believe me ...

http://www.hostmybb.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2616&mforum=raiders2005

 

[roosters4life]

After The First Replay I Thought It Was A 50/50 Call But After Watching More Replays That Was A Try. If Awarded Goes Into Golden Piont If Raiders Win There In The Top 8 But Are Now In 10th. That Game Has Cost The Raiders There Season

But As A Roosters Fan Dont Really Care, Go The Roosters!!!!

 

[ausraider]

After The First Replay I Thought It Was A 50/50 Call But After Watching More Replays That Was A Try. If Awarded Goes Into Golden Piont If Raiders Win There In The Top 8 But Are Now In 10th. That Game Has Cost The Raiders There Season

But As A Roosters Fan Dont Really Care, Go The Roosters!!!!

So why waste your life here.It's almost a week for that incident.

 

[Raider_69]

Finch would never admit the ref made a mistake in a Raiders game and the reasons for that are obvious.

very solid point