Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Mate why wasnt sully picked in the City vs Counrty then and ridell was, and if sully is so much better why aint the sharks re-signing him and they want ridell aswell, why waste the money???
I think Ridell is a good signing for us, but agree with everyone else who has said that we must also retain Sully.
I've been a fan of Ridell's for quite a while actually.
I couldn't give a f**k if Riddell is a shark or not. I'd really rather the money was used to get Kidley but aslong as sully stays I don't care if he comes.
If the stories prove to be true, I would be looking to move Sully to 5/8 and have Riddell in at Hooker 'and' Goal Kicker! I'm not too fussed whether he comes or not though...
post a pic of riddell in the sharks colours lets see if thats ok ? if not he can go to draggies but i hear manly are offering big bucks says in the paper
I would much rather us go after some other players.. Hooker isnt really a role we need to fill, we have Sullivan and Hilder who are doing fine there.. Tahu and Kurt Gidley are players i would be going after before Riddell..