RIP NRL

[Cockosh]

I

So go and find one where the ball was successfully charged down and penalty was given.
Find ONE.

Just 1.

don’t need to. The one on keary is clearly a dangerous Tackle and a penalty. You’d have to be an imbecile not to see it. Maybe wwf is more your sport

 

[bileduct]

I

don’t need to. The one on keary is clearly a dangerous Tackle and a penalty. You’d have to be an imbecile not to see it. Maybe wwf is more your sport

What did the match review committee think, mate?

 

[carcharias]

What did the match review committee think, mate?

did they say the non 6 again was wrong?

 

[bileduct]

did they say the non 6 again was wrong?

Match review committee doesn't get involved in those kinds of decisions, mate.

 

[carcharias]

Match review committee doesn't get involved in those kinds of decisions, mate.

The refs boss say it was wrong?
Aren’t they all connected?

 

[bileduct]

The refs boss say it was wrong?
Aren’t they all connected?

Annesley? He said this..

“So does that decision, the initial indication of six again effect the way Canberra play out that tackle? Yeah, I’m sure it does."

“Did they do it in a way that was acceptable and in a way that didn’t create confusion among the Raiders players? No, they didn’t."

Hmmm... Looks like Annesley is saying the way the overturn was carried out was unacceptable.

 

[carcharias]

Annesley? He said this..

“So does that decision, the initial indication of six again effect the way Canberra play out that tackle? Yeah, I’m sure it does."

“Did they do it in a way that was acceptable and in a way that didn’t create confusion among the Raiders players? No, they didn’t."

Hmmm... Looks like Annesley is saying the way the overturn was carried out was unacceptable.

Did he say the raiders lost because of it?

 

[bileduct]

Did he say the raiders lost because of it?

He said that it altered the course of the game in an unacceptable way, mate.

 

[Cockosh]

What did the match review committee think, mate?

Ruled Penalty would have been sufficient. Not a chargeable offence.

 

[bileduct]

Ruled Penalty would have been sufficient. Not a chargeable offence.

Nah they didn't, mate.

 

[Cockosh]

Nah they didn't, mate.

Of course not. They don’t rule on penalties. Ask a stupid question .....

 

[bileduct]

Of course not. They don’t rule on penalties. Ask a stupid question .....

That's right. They look for instances of chargeable offences, like dangerous contact.

 

[Cockosh]

That's right. They look for instances of chargeable offences, like dangerous contact.

It every dangerous contact goes on report. Plenty of high shots and penalties against kickers are simple penalties.

 

[carcharias]

He said that it altered the course of the game in an unacceptable way, mate.

everything alters the course of the game.
I bet there are things that went the Raiders way too that shouldn’t have.
Or should have.

 

[Game_Breaker]

everything alters the course of the game.
I bet there are things that went the Raiders way too that shouldn’t have.
Or should have.

And I bet all judgements from the ref were allowed to be made within the rules of the game

The rule book doesn’t give the ref the power to change his mind

 

[Exsilium]

Did not expect this thread to get much momentum.

It’s ancient history now. We, as fans, should be looking forward to the off-season scandals and investigations that will derail the 2020 season before it kicks off.

 

[myrrh ken]

Roosters fans are easier to bait than sharks groupies .

Haha. I think its cockosh thats got 5 green fishies on the line

 

[nick87]

I don’t need to. The one on keary is clearly a dangerous Tackle and a penalty. You’d have to be an imbecile not to see it. Maybe wwf is more your sport

haha what a disaster for you.
It happens all the time, 100% penalty, never not been given until now... but you can’t find me one god damn example

hit the bricks, clown
You’re done

 

[ReddFelon]

Lmao this is like a sub 80 iq take. Beej cannot be blamed for the last try. He legs tackled a much bigger player and the roosters won a fast play the ball.

Beej was one of our better players overall. Roosters were just the better side

He legs tackled the much bigger Boyd Cordner who is the same height and weighs less. Much bigger. Cordner got up and played the ball, Leilua was caught offside. It's literally the reason Keary had a 3 on 2 open to him.

 

[Maximus]

It most definitely is one of those. It is clearly dangerous. But I am sure you will try and make the case that keary is actually just flying
peacefully.

Completely irrelevant as keary is ultimately put into a dangerous position which the rule clearly states is not allowed. Unless you are trying to argue it isn’t dangerous then a penalty should have been awarded.

But it doesn't overrule the actual rule that says if the tackler is committed they can't be penalised.

Under your interpretation of the rules any kicker can just jump in the air after kicking the ball and auto penalty. We'd see 50 penalties a game because merely breathing on a kicker would result in a penalty. Lucky your interpretation is wrong because that sounds like a shit game.

This is no different to tackling a player in the air fielding a kick. If it bounces first and the player jumps to catch it they are free reign.

Mate it can still be dangerous even if he is committed, and even if there is no intent to injure (which knowing Sia I doubt there would have been any intent to injure).

But it still can't be a penalty.