hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,767
Chiefly like scoop there mate.I have inside info that Gutho is playing fullback.
You heard it here first... (period)
Chiefly like scoop there mate.I have inside info that Gutho is playing fullback.
You heard it here first... (period)
well then i say f**k it .... forfeit!!! .... there is no point. We are just risking injury in the cold .... put em all back on the bus with a warm blanky and bring the boys home
so many up sidesWould be better for our points differential since we won’t get flogged.
Because he has experience defending in the centres whereas Dunster doesn't, even in reserve grade.I just cannot imagine Fergo playing in the centres unless he is gonna move to the wing for say tackle 4 onwards, but then what would be the point of him in the centres in the first place.
You would've had them spending 90% of their time on attack.The only thing I would have been practicing and drilling into the players this week would have been playing with enthusiasm. Every year we turn up down there dragging our arses like kids being forced into church.
In the 14 full seasons since that 2006 win in Canberra we have played there 9 times. How many of those games should we have expected to win? In hindsight we can compare the teams at the end of a season to see which was stronger. Personally I think for-and-against is the best measure of a team's quality in a given year, and the difference between Parramatta and Canberra in the years we played them away has generally been stark:
2007 is the only year we were significantly stronger than them (our points differential compared to theirs was +222) and it is fair to say we underperformed in that particular game. But in the following eight games Canberra had a significantly better team (at least 199 points better over the year) half the time. Losing to the Raiders in those four games reflects nothing more than a lack of quality. Of the remaining four games we had a marginally better for-and-against (no better than +54 over the season) twice, while in the other two games Canberra were better by 22 points and 90 points:
2006 Eels +71 (Eels last win in Canberra)
2007 Eels +222
2011 Eels +47
2012 Raiders +252
2013 Raiders +224
2014 Eels +54
2016 Raiders +213
2017 Raiders +22
2018 Raiders +199
2019 Raiders +90
So the only year we should have expected to win (in hindsight) was 2007. We should expect to have lost to a superior team in 2012, 2013, 2016 and 2018. The only games where the teams were even close to evenly matched were 2011, 2014, 2017 and 2019. But a game between two evenly matched teams should probably be won by the team with home ground advantage, especially a team like Canberra with fairly unique weather conditions at home. If you look at games played in Sydney over the same period, the Raiders have had a better points differential every year except 2007 and 2009 (both years we beat them at home).
Eels victories in bold:
2006 Eels +71
2007 Eels +222
2008 Raiders +159
2009 Eels +34
2010 Raiders +84
2015 Raiders +133
2016 Raiders +213
2017 Raiders +22
2019 Raiders +90
2020 Raiders +24
In a couple of those years (2008 and 2016) they had a significantly better points differential and we still beat them at home. Maybe the Raiders had a soft underbelly, or maybe it's not statistically significant. Either way, in those years where there was less than a try per game (+96 over the season) between the two teams, the Raiders won 4 from 5 in Canberra and we won 3 from 6 at home. Maybe the problem is our home ground isn't as much of an advantage as theirs. The fact the Raiders play in Sydney about ten times every year would support this. They are used to Sydney while the only team used to playing and training in Canberra is the Raiders.
Canberra are rightly short odds to win it.So, who'll win tonight?
This is true. It will be a monumental win for the Eels if they get the 2 points but most suspect we'll come home empty handed, again.Canberra are rightly short odds to win it.
But the f**ken idiots will still think there needs to be somebody to blame. If the Raiders are up against such a superior team will they be looking for a scapegoat if they lose? Considering their fans are rugby league supporters they probably will.
Because he has experience defending in the centres whereas Dunster doesn't, even in reserve grade.
But the f**ken idiots will still think there needs to be somebody to blame. If the Raiders are up against such a superior team will they be looking for a scapegoat if they lose? Considering their fans are rugby league supporters they probably will.
No they are for defending four in. Ferguson has experience defending at fullback, wing and centre (two in).thats what backrowers are for
No they are for defending four in.
Good luck to our newest debutante Wiremu Greig who will make is debut off the bench against the Canberra Raiders.
All the best
# 813
Absolutely JE.Raiders are so much better then us, Stuart has better tactics plus they are at home...but f**k if we lose we are so shit and BA has no idea....should be replaced with Holbrook as his side is always ready to play!
The Titans are a deadset yoyo team under Holbrook! You never know if they will turn up!Raiders are so much better then us, Stuart has better tactics plus they are at home...but f**k if we lose we are so shit and BA has no idea....should be replaced with Holbrook as his side is always ready to play!
A defender out of position every now and then is very different to having him out of position for 80 minutes.oh ffs
what are they supposed to do if they are 3 or 5 in ? just let the attacker go ?