What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Roosters get $10,000 Breach Notice

Kaz

junior
Messages
6,376
http://www.nrl.com/news.cfm?ID=8317

The National Rugby League has issued the Sydney Roosters with a breach notice following comments it believes were made by the club coach to on-ground officials during the closing stages of Friday's match against the Broncos.

Three on-ground officials submitted separate reports alleging that abusive language was directed toward a touch judge and the referee at various times late in the game.

The Breach Notice proposes a $10,000 fine against the club. The Roosters have five business days in which to lodge submissions before any confirmation of the penalty would take place.

NRL Chief Executive, Mr David Gallop, said the breach was in line with rules which prohibit any club official abusing an on-ground official during or after a match.

"Coaches, players and club officials have to respect the position of the match officials," Mr Gallop said.

"Not only is it important to the running of the NRL but it is a foundation stone of the game from junior level up.

"Everyone has a right to disagree with the decision of a referee or touch judge and there are correct channels through which to pursue such disagreements.

"There can be no excuse for club officials making inappropriate comments and abusing officials."

The NRL reminds coaches who base themselves on the sideline that they are in a more public environment than a coach's box and that they may need to adjust their behaviour accordingly.

"We would hate to see a time where a coach's language or comments led to him being asked to leave a sideline, but it is possible that it could happen," Mr Gallop said.
 

ozzie

Bench
Messages
4,704
Mr Gallop - why wasn't someone else fined when the coach slammed a headset into the turf....???

If we are talking of double standards - this is still setting an example for kids...

Mr Lang - I hope kids don't start slamming things down and think they can get away with it...you set an example as well.
 
Messages
3,818
YYYYEEESSSSS!-the whinge gets fined-geez-he must have lost!!!
A throw of some headsets doesnt amount to much compared to telling an official to ........ off!
Feel the pressure!
 

*Sandy*

First Grade
Messages
6,619
Ozzie, thinking logically here, it might have been that Lang didn't actually direct his abuse at certain on field officials.

If you want to go into it that far Ozzie...then why isn't all the players fined for their words caught on camera. :roll: Another pathetic attempt by a rooster supporter in trying to throw off blame. And you wonder why we all roll our eyes when one of your respond in the manner you have just displayed.

I've got a 9 year old son who sits and watches the games on TV...with every swear word that he can lip read...I have to explain...so I am not completely in agreeance with Coaches and Players being filmed losing their temper...but I also see it as an adult sport and it is my choice to allow him to sit and watch and I take full responsibility in that and it wouldnt matter whether a coach loses it on field or in their box and throwing crap around...it's all the same and the media take great delight in filming it to be replayed.

Abusing officials onfield is an entirely different matter.
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
ozzie said:
Mr Gallop - why wasn't someone else fined when the coach slammed a headset into the turf....???

If we are talking of double standards - this is still setting an example for kids...

Mr Lang - I hope kids don't start slamming things down and think they can get away with it...you set an example as well.
I heard this same comparison on the radio this morning from a talk back caller......the radio hosts laughed at him as well.

I agree its not entirely Stuarts fault and he has every right to sit on the sideline.....he's an overly expressive person and the nine directors know this.
Its one thing to get the sh!ts......its another to get the sh!ts and direct that anger at someone else.
 
Top