What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round 6 (2005) Pirates Vs Rhinos

roosterboy60

Juniors
Messages
1,735
[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Coos Bay Pirates v Orange County Rhinos[/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Game Thread
Please note - This is a game thread only, therefore only game posts can be made here (Teams, Articles).
Any other posts will result in loss of points and is at the discretion of the referee.
Only original essays, not used in previous games, will be marked by referees.
[/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Home team captain will be allowed 3 reserves, visiting captain will be allowed 2 reserves
Rules: http://f7s.leagueunlimited.com/rules.asp
[/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Full Time: Wednesday 25th May at 9pm (Syd time)[/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Venue: Munich Olympic Stadium
ground_munich_1.jpg

Crowd: 6,780
REFEREE: Mystique
[/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]**Referee Blows Game On!**[/font]
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
Rhinos Line-up

Mzilikazi
Hightown Tiger
Not So Silent Bob
t-ba
Bartman (vc)
- - - - -
Parramatt (c)
Mr Angry
 

Prince Charles

Juniors
Messages
168
Prince Charles for the Pirates

-----------------------------------------------------

The Biased Commentator – Blight or Genius?

Much has been made recently about some Rugby League journalists and commentators having more than a passing interest in particular NRL clubs. A perceived bias or agenda is assumed and perhaps in some cases this assumption has some merit. But what is the problem with a little bias in our “experts”?

For many of us, the first person to spring to mind when you mention “bias” and “commentator” is Phil Gould. His association with the Sydney Roosters is no secret and his comments can at times be over the top. Gould’s knowledge of the game however, is astounding and his ability to communicate his thoughts to the world is possibly second to none. If you were watching the Thursday Footy Show last week then you would have seen Gould talk about bonding in State of
Origin. His words travel a wonderful winding road full of scenery that eventually leaves you with the hairs on the back of your next standing high.

I ask what more could you want from a commentator? A one man publicity machine that is controversial and brings out so many emotions in fans and media alike. He may as well be on the payroll at
Sydney’s Daily Telegraph as you can guarantee a Gould story within it each day, despite the fact he is a columnist for the Telegraph’s rival, The Sydney Morning Herald.

Gould has had much success in the past, having won a Grand Final with the Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs in 1988 as well as many State of
Origin matches during his reign as New South Wales coach. He played a pivotal role in the resurgence of the Sydney Roosters and many believe was the mastermind to the recent successful era at the club. Perhaps factors such as this play a part in many people hatred of the man. Tall poppy syndrome is alive and kicking within Australian culture and perhaps some people just want to see the successful people fail. No one likes a winner who knew he was going to win.

The main claim to disliking Gould however, has always been his apparently obvious bias towards the Sydney Roosters. I recall a recent match being broadcast on Channel Nine which Gould was commentating on. Despite the fact that game was being played between the South Sydney Rabbitohs and the Newcastle Knights, Gould managed to mention the Sydney Roosters at least six times. “Oh, look at this kid go – another former Rooster in this
South Sydney line-up” or “now when this bloke first started playing at the Roosters a few years back, we knew he was going to be good…”. Perhaps these are examples of what annoys many of us, but I doubt if Gould is any worse an offender then many of the other high profile media personalities in the game.

A quick look around at nearly all Rugby League commentators shows a large number are strongly affiliated with NRL clubs. Laurie Daley is now a coaching assistant at the St George Illawarra Dragons, Peter Sterling is on the coaching staff at the Warriors, Paul Harragon is on the Newcastle Knights board and Paul Vautin was not long ago the CEO of the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles.

So should we be concerned? I say no. If you want a person who has no strong links to any NRL club then go down to the local pub and find your Average Joe. But if you want someone who is involved in the game, has inside knowledge and knows what is involved in the day to day running of a Football team then these guys are the best there is. After all, why would a club want to employ someone who doesn't have expert knowledge in the game? Surely our TV networks should use many of the same theories when looking for a commentator.

At the end of the day, the final say on who you listen to always comes back to down to yourself. The choice is yours to either mute the television or simply just ignore what this commentator is saying all together. Perhaps though, we enjoy being angered. Perhaps we like to disagree and have strong emotions about what is being said because it involves you more so than just simply agreeing or being indifferent. Perhaps people such as Phil Gould bring us closer to the game not only through expert knowledge, but also through emotionally involving us into their commentary each and every weekend.




--------------------------------------------------

750 words inc title
 

Mzilikazi

Juniors
Messages
686
Mzilikazi takes the first stampede for the Rhinos

Blood, spit and tears:


Think back to the opening round of this year’s NRL competition. Do you remember Warriors player Nathan Fien with blood soaked bandages encircling his head packing into a scrum against Manly. Can you remember the Manly front row baulking at coming into contact with this monstrosity?



The Manly captain was pleading with the referee to evict the wounded player from play so that the danger of infection to his players was minimised.



Who was the player that had to have blood tests in the following week to ascertain whether he’d contracted a potentially fatal disease? For the last three months Shane Dunley has had to wait on tenterhooks for his results, his life potentially hanging by a thread because of a referee was incapable of decisive action.



This week Shane Dunley is in the news for a very different reason - a grade five contrary conduct charge for allegedly spitting on Parramatta player Marsh.



The contrary conduct charge is largely enacted when it is perceived that the game has been bought into disrepute. How many mothers of small boys yanked their kids out of junior competitions after the grisly spectacle of a blood smeared ghoul parading around a field in Round One? Did Sean Hampstead face a charge of contrary conduct because his refusal to deal with Fien’s blood bought the game into disrepute and risked the lives of players? Where then was all this concern about the ‘games image’ directed?



Our civilisation is founded upon a legal system that enshrines the judicial principle of innocent until proven guilty. Dunley fronts the judiciary guilty until proven innocent. The evidence looks inconclusive or, at worst, open to interpretation and subjectivity. No doubt Dunley spits but the cameras don’t seem to show if there’s a point of contact with Marsh.



In a court of law it would be up to the judiciary to show that the spit was directed at the player and/or that it actually hit Marsh. Dunley walked into the judiciary needing to change their already formed opinion that the spit was directed at the player and/or that it hit Marsh. This situation was magnified by the added penalty that contesting the charge and failing meant the possibility of a further two week sentence.



Let’s put the incident in its correct context. Dunley sat on the sideline for the first twenty minutes of a high stakes game, heart rate elevated and adrenalin coursing through his veins. He takes the field in a spiteful encounter where opposing players are taunting and needling his own team mates. The official NRL pre-match program has built up the Parramatta versus Manly rivalry on the field and the players are caught up in the drama.



He spends the next 15 minutes running around at a hectic pace. I highlight this because I want to freeze in on the moment of “the expectoration”. Dunley is wearing a mouthguard and is no doubt de-hydrated. His mouth would be dry, his mouthguard like a log on his palate and his saliva like glue.



Without labouring the point, you can see from the repeated slow motion replays of the incident that the spit virtually drops from Dunley’s mouth and strings of saliva suspend it in mid-air for a millisecond.



There are two points that need to be made:



1. I contend that NRL players would know what the roof of their mouth feels like in the 37th minute of an NRL game and would probably have some sympathy for Dunley’s need to spit to refresh his mouth, and would also recognise that the gummy saliva could lead to a certain lack of control.



2. There is a heated atmosphere on the field and in this climate players can tend to walk a fine line. Dunley may well have spat near Marsh to unsettle him just as Mark Riddell was on a mission to unsettle Michael Witt.



The issue is did Dunley deliberately spit ON Marsh and can this be proven beyond reasonable doubt? The judiciary says ‘yes’, unless compelling evidence to the contrary can be produced. In a court of law one wonders whether the prosecutor would be able to make the charge stick, especially given some of the context mentioned above. Somehow I think it’s unlikely on the evidence that I’ve seen.



Therefore, are the judicial proceedings little more than a kangaroo court for an organisation that is a master of the double standard, with Dunley a particularly compelling, even bloody, victim?

748 words including title
 

Godz Illa

Coach
Messages
18,745
Godz Illa ~ Pirates

Phone tap transcripts found



The NRL community rejoiced in celebration yesterday as the office and residence of a well-known female gossip writer who specializes in Rugby League scandal were raided by Federal Police. Discovered among the loot of bogus sources and counterfeit affidavits were reams of transcripts of illegal phone taps and tape recordings. The colourful conversations may plunge the League into crisis, but that will have to wait until the partying subsides. The following consists of a small sample of documents seized.





Malcolm (news source)



Malcolm: It's a waste of time talking to you.

Me: That's unfair.

Malcolm: It's not unfair.

Me: Until last week you hadn't even picked up the phone to call me but do you believe ...

[Malcolm interrupts]

Me: ... hang on, do you believe by banning the entire organisation it's a benefit to the Bulldogs?

Malcolm: Ah, no - I don't.

Me: So why did you do it?

Malcolm: Because.

Me: So you believe now you've made a mistake?

Malcolm: No I don't, not at all, no not at all.

Me: OK, so what have my colleagues done wrong?

Malcolm: Sometimes you have to stand on your principles and ...

Me: What are they? Based on someone writing an opinion piece you had a dummy spit and decided that you're going to penalise all hard-working journalists.

Malcolm: Oh please, please Rebecca come on, I'll just get the tissues out ... hang on a sec. Oh, that's just ridiculous.






Therese (friend 15 years)



[click]

Me: Does your husband know?

Therese: I hope he doesn’t find out

Me: Find out what?

Therese: What I told you yesterday.

Me: Right I remember what you told me yesterday, but the way you said it
was so poignant. Would you say it?

Therese: I just don’t want him to find out about my having a drink with that League player. I was so dumb.

Me: So you definitely had a drink with that player.
Therese: (inaudible)

Me: Sorry?

Therese: Yes.

Me: Yes what?

Therese: I had a drink with the player.

Me: Whose name was?

Therese: Luke. Are you having memory problems?

Me: Yes, could you recap?

Therese: I had a drink with the player, Luke.

Me: Let’s keep this between us.

Therese: Thanks sweety.





Lachlan (boss 8 years)



[click]

Lachlan: I’m feeling so guilty about what we did.

Me: Can you hang on a minute?

[Sound of tape recorder being turned on]

Lachlan: What was that?

Me: What?

Lachlan: That beep.

Me: A truck reversing. You feel guilty about what?

Lachlan: You know, the other night. I’d feel terrible if Sarah ever found out.

Me: How would she ever find out?

Lachlan: So you wont tell?

Me: I cant believe you’re asking me that.

Lachlan: I’m sorry.

Me: Find out about what?

Lachlan: You know. The kiss and the, you know.

Me: It was beautiful. I’d love for you to describe it.

Lachlan: Ha ha you’re so cute. I remember when we were dating back in the old days and you were so cold, and selfish...

[sound of tape recorder being turned off]

[sound of tape recorder being turned back on]

Lachlan: … and that time when you didn’t shave your legs or your armpits for 2 weeks. What was that beep?

Me: Truck again, but get back to the kiss.

Lachlan: Well, we had just had lunch and I walked you back to your crappy little unit, and we kissed by the mailboxes.

Me: Who is we again?

Lachlan: We? You and I.

Me: Who are you again?

Lachlan: What? I’m Lachlan, idiot.

Me: And my name is?

Lachlan: Are you insane? You’re Rebecca!

Me: I love it when you say my name…





Mum (mother)



Me: Mum, I’m really in a hurry, and I cant remember what you told me twelve years ago about how upset you were with Dad’s false tax return.

Mum: Well, let me think. I think he had under-reported some income on his second job… we were so desperate. Remember you needed that extra money while you were at TAFE?

Me: Oh yeah.

Mum: You needed money for… I can’t remember.

Me: To buy exam answers.

Mum: I cant hear you darling.

Me: I said – what was that beep?

Mum: A truck reversing. You were saying?

Me: I needed cash to buy answers for my TAFE entrance exam. But that’s between us, Mum.

Mum: Of course sweetheart. If you can’t trust your mother, who can you trust?


Investigations are continuing...
 

Manu Vatuvei

Coach
Messages
17,217
Thierry Henry- Pirates

State of Origin- The Kiwi Experience

I’ve been a Queensland supporter for as long as I can remember. Since 1992 I’ve watched State of Origin religiously. I recall cheering on Steve Renouf and Allan Langer, two of my early favourites; I remember the excitement I felt when my Granddad gave me a ball that he had persuaded Langer to sign, circa 1993; and I remember the euphoria of one classic sporting moment in particular- Mark Coyne’s try in the first game of the 1994 series. We all have favourite Origin memories; we all remember big hits, biff and brilliance, and we’ve all experienced the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat. In my case, however, it’s a bit different, because I’m not a Queenslander; I’m a born and bred Kiwi. And to make matters worse, my Grandma is from Sydney.

It’s strange really, because I’ve always been well aware that I’m ¼ New South Welshman, but up until last year it never occurred to me that my support of the Maroons made no sense. I even played for NSW in Forum 7s in a vain attempt to stir up some state pride. Nothing really worked- I enjoy the spectacle of Origin, but deep down I want the Maroons to win. Perhaps naively, I still see them as the perennial underdogs, and expect them to play with more pride and passion than their all-star rivals. Perhaps I see the same underdog qualities in the Maroons that I see in the Kiwis (no, I’m not just referring to Tonie Carroll and Brad Thorn) while NSW are the smug, confident superstars Kiwis sometimes perceive as representative of Australia as a whole. Of course, if the Kiwis could ever match the Maroons’ 50/50 record, the comparison would be much more apt.

The details of my personal story are really by the by. The point is, New Zealanders LOVE Origin, to an extent that is quite unusual. Sure, it’s a great sporting contest, but that fails to fully explain our fervour. In a recent interview Steve Price expressed surprise at the way in which his Warriors team-mates, many of them internationals themselves, psyched themselves up for Origin like fans, perpetuating their childhood awe of the game and the gladiators involved, even though most have been playing with and against the same players for years. For all of our protestations that it unfairly takes precedence over internationals, Kiwi league fans simply cannot resist Origin. Unlike Australian fans, who are naturally occasionally cynical about selection procedures, or who question whether the game has lost some of its lustre, most people I know look forward to Origin with unfettered enthusiasm. Very few are neutral- most support a team based on something half-remembered from childhood, something that caught their attention in the first game they watched, possibly even something passed down from their parents. I support Queensland partly because my Dad always has, which is particularly dubious, since he is ½ Kiwi, ½ New South Welshman. Origin, I think, is both played and supported with the heart and not the head. There is something universal about the binary opposites that are Queensland and NSW. All rugby league fans are intrinsically either Cockroaches or Cane toads at heart.

Inevitably, I must question why New Zealand has no alternative to Origin. A North v South rugby union match would probably be a major crowd-puller, and Auckland v Canterbury matches already have a NSW v Queensland feel to them- a culture clash between latte sipping city slickers and sheep-shagging Cantabs. My suspicion is that this would not work in rugby league, because the sport lacks the cultural and social diversity in New Zealand. No one would ever accuse the Warriors’ Auckland-born players of being latte-sippers. The league community in New Zealand is tight and necessarily nationalistic; the general feeling is that a concerted effort is required just to keep league in a position of relative prominence. There is simply no room for internal rivalries, because New Zealand rugby league fans are such a tightly knit group. The rather bizarre result is that the average Kiwi league fan enjoys 3 major rivalries; Kiwis v Kangaroos, Warriors v everyone, and NSW v Queensland. Maybe this is a sad indictment on league’s lack of penetration into our national psyche; regardless, Origin is entrenched in Kiwi culture, and one suspects this will never change, regardless of what the future holds for the game here. So, in the meantime, GO THE MAROONS! Or, ummm, the Blues.

750 words
 
Messages
12,700
Bobby DIGital

Pirates (Debut btw)

Rebuttal: You are Kurt Christensen



You were born deep in the heart of Canterbury. In the kiwi sense, things don't get much more country than Canterbury. Located in the South Island, it’s the pulse of New Zealand Rugby Union. Early in your life you were subjected to it, but you didn't really take a shining to it.

Fed up with life in the south, your parents moved your family to the fast-paced metropolis of Auckland. You settled in Te Atatu, a suburb steeped in Rugby League tradition. Your local club - The Te Atatu Roosters, were responsible for producing many kiwi test players, the Paul brothers being the most notable. It was here you began your affinity with Rugby League. You became enamored with the sport, and began following Australia's NRL. Ironically, the team you chose to support was named Canterbury, also affectionately known as the Bulldogs.

Your love for the Bulldogs grew as the years passed. Your father, who had made advancements in his career, decided it was time for another move. Your family migrated to posh suburb Whenuapai. Now an adolescent, you adopted a lifestyle akin to that of Paris Hilton, yet holding onto your love of Rugby League.

You are Kurt Christensen and you supported Canterbury religiously up until 2002. It was during this season when the Bulldogs were busted for salary cap breaches, and stripped of all competition points. Bulldog supporters went into mourning, devastated that their team was ousted from finals contention, when it seemed they were a huge chance to take the title. Canterbury ended that season as wooden spooners, yet the vast majority of Bulldog supporters stuck by their side. You had a different view.

Across town at Ericsson stadium, the New Zealand Warriors had made huge improvements and with the Bulldogs out of the picture, they were a good chance to take the premiership. The Warriors had ended Canterbury’s seventeen game winning streak two weeks prior to when the salary cap scandal broke. The Warriors, who were previously the joke of New Zealand sport, had now captured the imagination of the sporting public. The bandwagon became very crowded.

It was during this period when you decided to switch allegiances. You became a Warriors fan, leaving behind your beloved Bulldogs. You took a special interest in one Warrior in particular - Clinton Toopi, a troubled young man with a drinking problem. During the 2002 kiwi’s tour of Great Britain, Toopi was involved in an alcohol related fight with kiwi team mate Nigel Vagana. Toopi took exception to a joke made by Vagana, who suggested the Warriors wouldn't have made the Grand Final if it wasn't for the Bulldogs' ousting. Clinton Toopi was immediately sent home.

Toopi also caught the attention of channel 9 commentators, who inexplicably declared Toopi the best centre in the world in 2003. This laughable statement made you blind to the assortment of flaws in Toopi's game. You ignored the fact that Toopi couldn't pass or tackle, and gave away penalties sub-consciously. He was also sent to the bin on many occasions for dissent, abusing referees for his own mistakes.

In 2004 the Warriors started the season terribly, and eventually skillful second rower Ali Lauiti'iti was fired. With Lauiti'iti gone, Toopi had nobody to draw defenders and offload to him in space, giving him a saloon passage down the left side of the field. As Toopi became more ineffectual, your support for him grew. The Warriors finished 2004 equal last. Only a thrashing of Souths in the final round by Canberra saved the Warriors from the spoon.

After 9 rounds of typically inept Toopi performances to begin 2005, he was dropped by the Warriors, with Coach Tony Kemp sighting his lack of composure. You became disillusioned by his dumping stating "I don’t believe it unless I see proof".

That weekend commentator Jason Costigan stated during the Warriors-Roosters game, "The Warriors are without Toopi today, who's turning out for Otahuhu in the level below Bartercard Cup. So a real fall from grace for Toopi”. Kemp brought Toopi back from the Fox Memorial Cup to face Souths in round 11, this time from the interchange bench. Toopi wasn't injected into the action until the game was beyond doubt, well into the second half. Not long after he made his way onto the field, he made a poor attempt at tackle and Souths scored. After the game you rejoiced, declaring "Toopi's back baby".

You are Kurt Christensen and your opinion is truly yours.

750 words including title.
 
Messages
468
Not so silent bob for the Rhinos.

NSW Selectors.

I hate the NSW selectors. My beef with these guys mainly concerns this years 30 man preliminary squad. It is one of the biggest piles of crap I’ve seen in recent years. How some people got there ahead of others is ridiculous. Let us go through the list shall we?

First, I’ll start with the players, who should be there, like:

Luke Bailey: Always plays his heart out. In good form.

Trent Barrett: Kicked arse in City/Country and has played well.

Nathan Hindmarsh: Gives his heart and soul to the Eels each week. And can play.

Brett Kimmorley: Has steered the Sharks into the top 4.

Luke O’Donnell: I like O’Donnell. Good form, tough forward, and he smashed Michael Monaghan’s jaw, shutting him up for once. What’s not to like?

Luke Priddis: Playing better than Buderus, but will be unfairly dropped.

Jason Ryles: Makes a great front-row pairing with Bailey.

Trent Waterhouse: Tough, and playing well (plus my mum loves him).

Anthony Watmough: As much as it pains me to say, he’s been playing well and deserves his spot.

Those guys all deserve to be there, especially Trent Barrett. He has outshone all other NSW five-eights in the comp in two games. If they don’t pick him in the team, they should be shot. Twice. In the kneecaps.

There are also players in this squad who are maybe/maybe not players, such as:

Braith Anasta: Has played well, but with Barrett giving it both barrels, I can’t see how he’ll get in.

Danny Buderus: Incumbent captain. Will be picked, shouldn’t be picked.

Joel Clinton: May claim a bench spot.

Craig Fitzgibbon: Proven representative player, but form is a big issue this year.

Craig Gower: Playing well, but with Kimmorley in front of him, he is just the back-up.

Ben Hornby: Can’t see him making it this year.

Scott Hill: May grab a utility bench spot.

Ben Kennedy: Playing well, but injury prone and too old.

Matt King: Probably should be picked, but won’t be ahead of the two Dragons centres.

Luke Lewis: Prior experience may see him grab a spot.

Steve Menzies: Probably should be picked.

Luke Rooney: A lot of Luke’s in this squad.

Anthony Tupou: Has potential. Maybe next year.

They’re all fifty-fifty players, players that can make it, but could be dropped just as easily, although Menzies will more than likely be picked. And I don’t like that. I’m all for giving young guys a go. And that’s what these selectors can’t wrap around their fat heads.

The next list is my favourite. This is the list of players who just should not be there:

Ryan “What about me?” Cross: God this guy pisses me off. He is constantly whining that he doesn’t get picked for NSW. Ryan, I need to tell you something: IT’S BECAUSE YOU’RE CRAP!!! Change your attitude and you’re in with a chance.

Ben Creagh: This player is at least two to three years off being a rep player. Don’t pick him now.

Matt Cooper and Mark Gasnier: I acknowledge that these guys are good players. But their attitude towards the City/Country match greatly annoys me. Not the fact they were “injured”, but the fact that they miraculously recovered from their injuries to play for St George/Illawarra the next day leads me to one conclusion: They are both money grabbing bitches.

Brent Kite: This guy shows nothing, offers nothing, and plays for Manly. Need I say more?

Anthony Minichello: THE most overrated player in rugby league. His form sucks, and the only reason he’ll get picked is because Ricky Stuart loves him. I’d choose Ryan McGoldrick over Minichello.

Andrew Ryan: Has offered nothing all season. Punt him, please.

Craig Wing: Ah, the perennial pin-up boy. Comes from the same whining class as Cross. “Oh, why don’t they choose me in the starting line-up? Boo hoo.” STOP YOUR BITCHING. You are not good enough to be in the starting line-up.

The above selections annoy me a great deal. But not as much as the following omissions:

Brett Hodgson: Hodgo has been playing his best footy for one and a half years now. Easily the leading fullback in the comp.

Lance Thompson: The ultimate example of club loyalty. Has got the most heart out of anyone in the NRL.

Eric Grothe: Big, powerful, and fast. How can you not pick him?

John Skandalis: Always makes metres, does carloads of tackles, and has a lot of heart. PICK HIM YOU BASTARDS!

NSW Selectors are pricks.

750 words.
 

Hightown Tiger

Juniors
Messages
315
The Rhinos Hightown 'Billy Slater' Tiger gives him the big don't argue!

Where to next?

You may or may not remember an article from me last year. It was about someone who I played rugby with, called ‘Dragon.’ In that particular essay, I made refernce to the fact I have scored 1 try and 1 goal in 19 matches for my team (Castleford Aybertigers)….is ‘’he a prop?’’ your probably thinking. Well no, I play wing/centre, so you’d expect me to get a few more!

Anyway, my tally now stands at 4 tries and 1 goal in 25 games, so things are looking up.

It all started last year, around September. I had played for my team, the Aybertigers for two years now, and I lacked confidence. In training I wouldn’t look for the ball, in matches…hell I wanted to be on the subs bench, I never liked starting because I thought I’d let the team down. The only thing I was good at was keeping the club accounts up to date.

It’s hard to explain what happened next. We got a new coach, I picked up in training. I enjoyed it much more, scoring at times 3 or 4 tries in training. I still couldn’t take the confidence and success I was having at training into matches, but it was a start.

The presentation night came along, I thought I was in with a shout of most committed player, as I very rarely missed a training session. I was gutted when I found out on the night that particular award had been dropped. First award of the night-Most improved. Now, I knew I’d improved but I did’t think I was the most improved. I was therefore very surprised when I picked up the most improved player trophy, I seemed to mumble a speech which no one understood, then the rest of the night is a bit of a haze!

Right, I don’t want this essay to turn into the Hightown Tiger appreciation essay. But things are looking up, not just for me but for the whole team. We won the Castleford Sevens (which is great because we paid for the trophies and…..won them!). I was vice captain for the ‘B’ team, and we finished runner up in the plate final.

At a recent tournament in Sheffield we went out in the semis. Not bad to say we were stuck in Castleford 45 minutes before the tournament was due to start with just 4 players! We eventually lost to a Sheffield all stars team which contained the likes of Mark Aston (Sheffield Eagles coach), Lee Jackson (former Leeds and Hull hooker, currently with York) and a sprinkling of Sheffield 1st team players.

On the finance side, things are going well. And just the other week Castleford Tigers’ Adam Watene turned up to training. That was an experience, I thought I’d skinned him on the outside but for a big guy he’s pretty quick!


Adam Watene:
watenea.jpg



I hope we can keep the team together, because we have a good set of players…recently we beat Halifax 96-4, our record score, although we are struggling to maintain consistency. Most players play for an amateur team as well (whereas Castleford Aybertigers are more of a social team and play games against other supporters teams).

This is a far cry from 2 years ago, when often we would get no more than 4 players at a training session. I remember turning up once and there was just one other player. No we are looking at 15+ players.


By now your probably thinking where am I heading? Well as most of you are aware, in 2008 the Rugby League World Cup is to be held in Australia. It is my hope that either Castleford Aybertigers, or a combined British team can get a game going against our Aussie counterparts…I know there has been talk on League unlimited of a touch tournament, so something like that would be good. More trophies for the Aybertigers? J

I’m not sure how easy it will be to arrange this, but I’m sure it can be done. It will give both sets of supporters something to do other than sampling the ‘singing syrup.’ And it might mean England/Britain can put one over the Aussies for once.

Roll on 2008!

-------------------------------------------------------------

705 words including title. Thanks to www.thecastlefordtigers.co.uk for the picture
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
Bartman untangles the toliet roll paper from his legs and prepares to hit it up for the Rhinos...

Expansion: The long and the short of it…

Last week saw the announcement of a wide ranging Super League Strategy for the English game, and this week sees an NRL announcement about a 16th team. Big changes in the offing for the game we love! Long-term or short-term in approach, it's all being done in the name of expansion.

But expansion is a tricky beast that can trigger mixed feelings. Generally, people involved in league at all levels think it's a good thing, if it's done "right". But there are almost as many views to what is "right" for rugby league as there are supporters of the game! And there are examples of expansion not working in rugby league; one only has to look at the 20 team ARL competition of 1995-6 and what followed to realise that there are always risks involved.

So what of these current plans for expansion? First, the NRL is poised to announce a 16th team to join the competition from 2007. The three contenders who all originally entered bids last year were Gold Coast, Central Coast and Wellington, and a decision was deferred until this season. The merits or otherwise of which area is admitted to the NRL is a discussion I'll leave for another place, but punters' wisdom shows the odds in favour of Gold Coast getting the nod this time.

Things have changed a lot since the last time this competition had sixteen teams in 1994. North Sydney no longer exists at this level, Illawarra have merged with St George, and Western Suburbs have merged with Balmain, so we've seen a consolidation of teams within and on the fringes of Sydney. A previous incarnation of the Gold Coast has since bit the dust, but we now have teams based in Melbourne, North Queensland and New Zealand, showing a willingness to promote and establish top level rugby league in wider areas. Many argue that you can't expand infinitely without some contraction in the heartlands of where your competition has traditionally been played.

But this is where I fear the NRL is not quite prepared for the consequences of their announcement on Friday? When setting the path for entry for one aspirant, questions will be asked about the future paths for the other candidates, as well as the fate of mergers and relocations for smaller Sydney clubs. Already the 16th team debate has raised discussion about teams from areas like Perth, only to be met with nothing more concrete from the NRL than a comment about "maybe within 10 years". Will the NRL be able to spell out its longer-term plans about expansion beyond 2007, or stick with a short-term announcement, leaving everyone in further confusion?

I really hope the NRL has been using the year it's taken to make this 16th team decision to think about the longer-term landscape it sees for our game, and that it is ready to announce some of those future visions at the same time. That's why I have respect for last week's announcement of a broad long-term strategy by the English Super League, outlining where it hopes to get to by 2009. It's not a short-term knee-jerk reaction, nor is it a one-step at a time short-term fix - it set out a vision which leaves all parties with clarity about what changes to expect over the next four years.

But in their detail, the English proposals will be quite a change for northern rugby league. Again expansion seems to feature heavily as a motivation for changes which include the goal of a fourteen team competition in 2009, and an end to annual promotion and relegation. The composition of the English game is more volatile at the elite level, with six of the teams from that first Super League season in 1996 no longer playing at this level.

Super League officials have opened the door for a future invitation to a second team from France, but have said that any expansion teams from areas within the UK will have to work their way up the system of hierarchical leagues. In a sporting culture which has always embraced automatic promotion and relegation, there is fear that a new system using off-field criteria to assess potential promotion to Super League will favour these expansion teams above traditional heartlands teams. Alienation of traditional fans is one of the risks of expansion, and through a long-term or short-term approach Super League and the NRL would do well to keep that in mind.

750 words including title
 

half

Coach
Messages
16,735
half | Pirates

Mic Check

Sometimes I wish I didn't live in this town
It lets me down like snakes and there are no ladders around
From white and brown to white, rust red, teal and black
Like Quasimodo with the lump, I can't get Penrith off my back
It's just apart of who I am, even though I'm an Eels fan
I ain't crazy for the Panthers like Stan was for Eminem
But I often have to wonder where I would ever be without them
Like Superman without Lex Luthor or Europa without Jupiter?

Do the Panthers even understand what Penrith means?
I once explained it succinctly and ever so brilliantly
It's the home of pimply teens with westside dreams serving up Krispy Kremes
But there's nothing really ‘Penrith’ about this professional team
This area should be represented by the cream of the crop
But we've got Luke Rooney on top and he's as ugly as they got
And I seen him at the chemist buying ointment for a problem
That's between him and his doctor, so don't tell him I told ya

Though when it comes to being Luke, there's no worse than Lewis
Really c'mon now, there ain't much to it – He blew it
Cost the Blues in Origin Two last year. What? Don't believe me?
Well get out the tape, check it out and you'll see
Billy Slater scored man of the match, played like a glamour
Whereas Luke Lewis hit rock bottom faster than MC Hammer
And it's no wonder. U can't touch this? Seems u can't touch the ball
The New South Wales selectors don't want you in the team no more

And that's a fact, Luke Lewis just got served
But the Vanilla Ice look-a-like only got what he deserved
It's no wonder the Panthers ain't high up the ladder
Rooney and Lewis filling up the cap like urine in my bladder
By commanding high pay there was simply no way
They could replace Whatuira with anyone better than Franze
John Lang, here's a tip - you're tripping like Wes Naiqama
If you think this squad you've assembled can go far

Seriously coach, what are you thinking? What do you call that?
Damn, not even Ian Thorpe would call that line-up phat
Penrith's flow is only fully sick in a medical sense
Man, I'm talking lamer than Six Pence None the Richer
If the NRL was Desperate Housewives Parra would be Teri Hatcher
And Penrith would be the one with red hair. Oh yeah - I just went there
I have to ask and put it blunt, how did it get this way?
If Penrith was a hairstyle it would be a toupee

But it could be worse; it could be Joel Clinton's
It's just like when the ref of the game is Paul Simpkins
I have to ask “what is he thinking with that decision?”
It stands to reason that his hairdresser is cheap for a reason
And you don't need Vogue magazine to tell you his style out of season
And what's up with the sideburns? They have to be chopped
Like Clinton from first grade if the losing must stop
The story of a loser: From Australia to failure

Same goes for Gower and Waterhouse. You know the story
From representing Australia and grand final glory
To getting dissed by Laurie in the Fox Sports commentary booth
You don't need to be a sleuth, it's the obvious truth
The Panthers set a poor example for the Penrith youth
Kids, convert to Parramatta while you still have a chance
The Panthers have fallen off the map like Holly Valance
I love Penrith. This is my hood, these are my streets
But it brings a smile to my face when the local team is beat

When I think ahead to winter and the freezing cold nights
Basking in delight at the plight of the Panthers
When the Eels are at full flight, ready to ignite
Like butane lighters, think Christina Aguilera - Fighter
Or Steve Prefontaine running along the track
Serving up tries like McDonald's serves fries and Big Macs
It's gonna get messy so you better get a napkin
And don't forget to pick up a straw for your drink
‘C4’ I just sunk Penrith's last battleship

Out!
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
I think that's it for the Rhinos - unfortunately t-ba, and subs ParraMatt and Mr Angry were unable to post in this match.

Apologies to all concerned.
 

Mystique

Juniors
Messages
75
Pirates



Prince Charles - The Biased Commentator – Blight or Genius?
750 words


Nicely written, no mistakes that I can see, and makes a good point into the bargain. Its very hard to have passion for the game and lack of bias at the same time.

Score: 87



Godzilla – Phone tap transcripts found

747 words

I was a bit bemused by this at first, but laughed a lot as I started reading it and got into it. Very funny comedy piece.

Score: 81



Thierry Henry - State of Origin- The Kiwi Experience

750 words
Excellent, professional quality writing in a topical opinion piece.


Score: 92



Boby DIGital - Rebuttal: You are Kurt Christensen

Personal opinion piece about changing allegiances and the sometimes disappointing results.

Score: 85



Half – Mic Check

714 words

I normally hate poetry but I liked this rap-style piece, bemoaning the local team. Needs music.

Score: 84

TOTAL: 429


Rhinos



Mzilikazi - Blood, spit and tears:

748 words

A convincing argument in defence of Shane Dunley and his spitting charge. Technically very well written and full of passion.
Score: 90




Not so silent bob - NSW Selectors.
750 words


Comprehensive look at NSW selection possibilities and probabilities. Solid knowledge of the game but it’s more of a list than an essay.

Score: 78



Hightown Tiger – Where to next?

705 words

More of a ‘letter from Hightown’ than an article but it’s a really nice read. Personal observations, a nice story of personal achievement in the middle and an upbeat and hopeful ending. Couple of spelling mistakes.

Score: 85



Bartman - Expansion: The long and the short of it…

Intelligent and critical look at expansion both in Australia and the UK and the need for a strategy for the future. Excellent journalistic article.

Score: 90


TOTAL: 343


Pirates 429 def Rhinos 343


Man of the match: Thierry Henry for the Pirates.
 

Mystique

Juniors
Messages
75
PS. Sorry for the delay, guys. I lost my internet on Thursday and hadn't saved the game, and had to wait for the weekend to borrow someone else's connection.
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
No worries Mystique, these things happen. Thatnks for the effort to get to it through other means.

Congrats Pirates, great articles and a solid deserved win. And well done Thierry on MOM.

Well done fellow Rhinos, we always get a good team avergae vs our actual number of posts - just have to get the five posts in to be competitive.
 

Mzilikazi

Juniors
Messages
686
Thanks for the marking mystique - the game couldn't be had without the dilligence and commitment of the referees.

Well done on the win Pirates and better luck next time Rhinos.
 

Latest posts

Top