Yep due to the inconsistent review panel of grading.
So they great NRL counsel prosecutor straight out of school uses 2 meek Grade 1 so called water tight examples for his case which easily are shot down by the high flier roosters lawyer defence, argued and convinced the judiciary in no time. Fed dinkum. Great offence, well done!
Why did he just present some Grade 2 prior offences which were not as bad as we all know no one is more inconsistent than the review panel. Or show some of Tariq Sims penalties. Better still show Momorovski's tackle which was upheld and worth 3 weeks to the judiciary's eyes. Was it 3 times as bad as Radleys
And of course the no-name from Penrith did not get off.
How does Hetherington feel..5 wks and a send off for Holmes who got straight back up V Radley $1,900 loose change fine
The whole system is a basket case and depends on your popularity
In saying that I did not think there was much in Radley's either.