- Messages
- 77,704
100% As @strider said, there is no way that anyone could argue that both Ennis & Wighton were not shoulder charges.
The stupidity of it all is now that precedent has now morphed the strict definition of a shoulder charge (which was pretty clear early on for all to understand) to a technical situation which gives rise to barristers to use stop motion stills etc to provide proof of separation. It's all bullshit and poorly managed.
Great work Todd.
The stupidity of it all is now that precedent has now morphed the strict definition of a shoulder charge (which was pretty clear early on for all to understand) to a technical situation which gives rise to barristers to use stop motion stills etc to provide proof of separation. It's all bullshit and poorly managed.
Great work Todd.