What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rugby Australia to target top NRL talent - Lomax case settled

Fangs

Referee
Messages
21,537
We can offer a Josh Curran who is surplus to needs this year.

Barnett/Lomax is 100 to 1. Lomax would be next to no chance of seeing out two years in NZ. He'd spit the dummy 6 months in and walk out.

Gotta be a Sydney club. Or a successful club like Brisbane. Dogs could trade a forward but it depends what Parra are after.

Jesse Ramien at Cronulla?
 

JokerEel

Referee
Messages
20,138
This will be appealed. Melbourne were always going to be paying legal costs. PVL will ensure something happens to get Lomax playing this year. I don't think the behind the scenes stuff with Melbourne helped the case in any way. I would need to see the arguments that were put to the court, probably the lawyers went the wrong route. Restraint of trade and limiting earning window should have been the arguments, I suspect these weren't presented properly.


Thier was no arguments the Eels and Lomax/Storm came to an agreement and the court signed off on it so their won't be an appeal.
 
Messages
3,594
It looks like the Eels and Lomax/Storm came to this agreement and the court signed off on it.
then it smells like eels will grant permission for lomax to sign to storm after round 1 is done. otherwise it makes no sense for storm to agree to it.

i know eels fans are happy but fmd you guys are gonna get shafted this season in ways which might not be so apparent. we already know the big teams get the 50/50 calls more often than not, in every sport too. buckle up, youre in for a rough season.
 

Legal Eel

Juniors
Messages
1,661
This will be appealed. Melbourne were always going to be paying legal costs. PVL will ensure something happens to get Lomax playing this year. I don't think the behind the scenes stuff with Melbourne helped the case in any way. I would need to see the arguments that were put to the court, probably the lawyers went the wrong route. Restraint of trade and limiting earning window should have been the arguments, I suspect these weren't presented properly.
Dumbest thing I've read on here.

It can't be appealed - Zac has AGAIN agreed to this.

He has now endorsed the restraint beyond any challenge!

There was no unreasonable restraint of trade in the circumstances of this matter. Your "cornflakes box" legal analysis is completely wrong and utterly misconceived, because it is clearly clouded by tribalism and bias
 

JokerEel

Referee
Messages
20,138
then it smells like eels will grant permission for lomax to sign to storm after round 1 is done. otherwise it makes no sense for storm to agree to it.

i know eels fans are happy but fmd you guys are gonna get shafted this season in ways which might not be so apparent. we already know the big teams get the 50/50 calls more often than not, in every sport too. buckle up, youre in for a rough season.

The Storm agreed to it it seems as they and thr NRL tried to do some dodgy shit and dont want it to come out in the courts.

I am not happy I agree I would rather lomax be playing but the Storm also. Need to do a player swap not just expect him for nothing..
 

Dogs Of War

Coach
Messages
13,822
Dumbest thing I've read on here.

It can't be appealed - Zac has AGAIN agreed to this.

He has now endorsed the restraint beyond any challenge!

There was no unreasonable restraint of trade in the circumstances of this matter. Your "cornflakes box" legal analysis is completely wrong and utterly misconceived, because it is clearly clouded by tribalism and bias

Melb were the ones funding it and have decided to not continue that route. Lomax would still have options if he wanted to fund it himself, but he obviously doesn't have that sort of cash.

As for Parra. I couldn't give a shit about Parra, as the music men sang at the World Sevens years ago, We can play the Parramattta, oh, Parramatta doesn't matter doesn''t matter doesn't matter.
 

League Unlimited News

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
10,401
The Parramatta Eels today provide the following update regarding Zac Lomax and proceedings involving the Melbourne Storm.

In November 2025 as part of Zac Lomax's release from the remaining three years of his contract with the Parramatta Eels, Zac agreed that he would not play with another NRL team prior to 31 October 2028 without the written consent of the Eels.

Over the past two months the Eels and the Melbourne Storm have worked towards reaching an agreement to enable Zac to play with the Storm. At no time did the Storm make an offer that could be implemented that would provide appropriate value for our football program.

The Eels and the Storm have been unable to reach an agreement for the Eels to provide consent for Zac to play with the Storm.

Today, the Supreme Court by consent made an order which has the effect of prohibiting Zac from entering into a contract, working, training or playing with any other NRL Club until 31 October 2027 without the Eels written consent.

The court order is consistent with the restraint in the Deed of Release that Zac signed with the Eels on 16 November 2025, other than the Eels have agreed that the term of the restraint will now cease on 31 October 2027 rather than 31 October 2028. All other terms of the deed of release remain in place.

The Melbourne Storm have consented to a costs order made by the Supreme Court that the Melbourne Storm will contribute $250,000 towards the legal costs incurred by the Parramatta Eels.

The Eels are willing to work with Zac and his agent to find an NRL club that wants to sign Zac in exchange for the Eels receiving appropriate value for its football program.

Parramatta Eels Chairman Matthew Beach said, "The legal case was never about preventing Zac from returning to the NRL. It was about ensuring that the terms of Zac's release, which Zac agreed to after seeking legal advice, were adhered to. As I have said before, contracts are an important part of the NRL as they are for every member of the community.

"The consent order made by the Court order confirms that the restraint that Zac agreed to when he signed the Deed of Release will have legal effect. A key term of the restraint was the requirement to obtain the written consent of the Eels before Zac could sign with another NRL club.

"We would like to thank our legal team led by Arthur Moses SC, Liam Meahger and the team at Workplace Law for their guidance and advice throughout this process.

"We were always willing to consider a deal that would strengthen our football program. After trying for over two months, we were unable to reach an agreement with the Storm.

"We believe that Zac is a good young man and we are willing to work with him and his agent, in an open and transparent manner, to explore ways that we can reach an agreement where Zac can return to the NRL.

"While this period has presented some unique challenges, we felt strongly about standing up for what we believed to be right, and we appreciate the passion, unity and alignment we have seen from our members, fans, sponsors and everyone within the Club," added Mr Beach.


 

Barney Stubble

Juniors
Messages
771
well well
No surprise to anyone with a brain
Parramatta won the case they were .... never going to lose . And Lomax's legal team knew this & got out before they were destroyed in court. Id say the Storm weren't prepared to be made look like shit bags in the public domain & told the wigs , we will only pay his bills to this point.

Was never a restraint of trade , as smarter posters stated & now its over to another club to see if they'll give Parramatta a player , or its super league or yawnion for zachy boy
 

Barney Stubble

Juniors
Messages
771
Dumbest thing I've read on here.

It can't be appealed - Zac has AGAIN agreed to this.

He has now endorsed the restraint beyond any challenge!

There was no unreasonable restraint of trade in the circumstances of this matter. Your "cornflakes box" legal analysis is completely wrong and utterly misconceived, because it is clearly clouded by tribalism and bias
This dogs of war guy should apply to represent Prince Andrew
he'll be waiting a beheading in the tower 5 minutes later
 

Munky

Coach
Messages
14,538
Shame we'll never see the communications between the Storm, Lomax and NRL.

I thought Lomax would threaten to challenge the legality of the salary cap to get the NRL to force through a deal.

Must have been some shit in the emails and text messages.
 

Rabbit toes

First Grade
Messages
6,067
Shame we'll never see the communications between the Storm, Lomax and NRL.

I thought Lomax would threaten to challenge the legality of the salary cap to get the NRL to force through a deal.

Must have been some shit in the emails and text messages.
Martina might have blown his lid!
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
4,026
Melb were the ones funding it and have decided to not continue that route. Lomax would still have options if he wanted to fund it himself, but he obviously doesn't have that sort of cash.

As for Parra. I couldn't give a shit about Parra, as the music men sang at the World Sevens years ago, We can play the Parramattta, oh, Parramatta doesn't matter doesn''t matter doesn't matter.
Cope
 

Latest posts

Top