What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rugby Ready to Show its Resilience

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
A very forthright article from a bloke who you'd expect no less from. A lot of sense and a lot to agree with. He is now on the ARU board.



Rugby ready to show its resilience

JOHN EALES

A general consensus has rugby in the middle of a great big "U" at the moment – no, we are not talking of any particular peccadilloes of those living far east of Byron Bay but rather the rut it has found itself in of late.
It is not alone of course, as most major sports have their challenges.
In AFL circles you are no longer allowed to say that you are "stoked" as that has taken on a whole new meaning after Matthew Stokes's arrest for allegedly dealing drugs.
And you wouldn't bet on Brendan Fevola staying out of trouble for too long . . . although he might.
Rugby league has had its own share of trouble but no more than usual and it has consistently proved exceptionally resilient to much worse in the past.
Rugby has also not been without the wrong type of headlines of late, but the winds of change are blowing and as with the AFL and rugby league, the resilience of the sport is on-field led.
Last week, at the request of Queensland Rugby Union chairman Rod McCall, I stepped back into rugby as the newly nominated Queensland director of the ARU board.
Although slightly daunting to follow in the footsteps of the former Chief of Defence Forces, Peter Cosgrove, it is considerably better to do so in the ARU foyer in Christie Street, St Leonards, than it would be in East Timor.
Since my appointment I have received much congratulations and even more advice – I expected no less in the emotional and sometimes irrational world of sport.
But while it is an interesting and challenging time to step in, it is also an exciting time, and as one of my friends suggested it is better being on the inside of the tent and . . . well you know the rest.
Rugby does have its challenges at the moment, some urgent and the rest simply pressing.
A snapshot from any of my "advisers" reels off: player contracting and third-party agreements, factional fighting, greedy players, poor administration and the quality of the product, among a plethora of other issues, both real and imagined.
If you were to prioritise, however, after a season when even the die-hards were disillusioned, the quality of the on-field product had to be a priority and both anecdotally and tangibly the entertainment renaissance has begun.
No games have been more heartening for supporters than the weekend's Bulls and Queensland Reds encounter, won 19-12 by the Reds.
This is the game the Reds would have lost nine times out of 10 over the last half a dozen years – they probably would have also lost it in round one; not so now.
It's amazing what you can achieve with a bit of self belief.
If not before, you now have to consider Ewan McKenzie the best current home-grown coach in Australia.
He knows how to marshal a team to play to their strengths and to win.
With four matches remaining until 10 teams break for an early de-brief, the Reds sit precariously in the top four, a position which even the most biased of supporters, and without doubt the players themselves, wouldn't have picked.
Now the road home is tough but undoubtedly surmountable.
The Reds winning, and doing so through attractive play, is a huge and timely fillip for Australian rugby.
As a breeding ground, Queensland provides almost 40 per cent of the rugby players in Australia. For those players and fans, the Reds become a team to look up to and believe in.
It is a game for school kids to wear their Reds hat and jersey. Quade Cooper and Will Genia are now the names bandied around in the lunch hour, and dormant roots are again springing shoots.
With this success and with the whistle now blown to the advantage of the attacking team and not the defenders, fans are watching a more compelling game and business is taking action.
The upside is immediate, with Channel Nine rumoured to have signed a contract to usurp bitter rivals Channel Seven to show domestic Test matches and an hour of Super 15 highlights from next season.
This is huge for rugby as since the introduction of Super Rugby in 1996 the game has had no presence on free-to-air television.
Granted, pay TV has paid the bill but a lack of presence on free-to-air screens, largely due to the tournament not being on the government's anti-syphoning list, has geniused the growth of the game.
This predicament alone has excluded about 80 per cent of the population from watching the greatest showcase of provincial rugby in the southern hemisphere in their own lounge room.
Nine's action positions it cleverly to take advantage of any change to the anti-syphoning status quo.
But, while the challenges on the board are imposing and the potential is also heartening, it's important to be realistically availed of where you are at.
At the end of my first meeting, someone made the comment to CEO and MD John O'Neill that at least managements' eyes were open to the specific challenges that lay ahead, to which another added, "yes . . . wide open all night".


http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/rugby-ready-to-show-its-resilience-20100419-sop0.html
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
It's union or rugby union, not rugby.
Give it up Paley.. it IS Rugby... the game, and anybody associated with it, have every right to call itself such.... just as League, and anybody associated with it can call that code Rugby... BOTH are Rugby... its up to the code that wants to differniate itself to change. Until then you can call League Rugby and those who grew up calling Rugby "Rugby" will continue to do so.


The same real world where rugby league players were banned from union because they were professional rugby players? Union does like to revel in its hypocrisy.
How come you dont harp on about the IOC banning sportsmen who were professional for all those years???? it was the same ideal... play the sprt for the love of the game not the money... the fact that that particualr sentiment doesnt really work in the real world is irrelevant... while Rugby wasnt openly professional, when the should have been, they had every right to ban those who were.... after all they were only banned from playing Rugby.. nothing else.
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
Lots of people played rugby professionally. I have been watching professional rugby for 40 years.

I don't particularly care what the IOC did.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
Lots of people played rugby professionally. I have been watching professional rugby for 40 years.

I don't particularly care what the IOC did.

So then whats your point?? or are you just trolling like you normally do.
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
So then whats your point?? or are you just trolling like you normally do.

Not trolling at all. It would be interesting to see an article claiming John Eales never played rugby. I wonder what the unionites would make of that.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
Not trolling at all. It would be interesting to see an article claiming John Eales never played rugby. I wonder what the unionites would make of that.

The article would be lying.. he clearly played Rugby for a very long time... Only a moron would claim he didnt...

you call League Rugby... bully for you... you have every right too.. It would still make you an idiot or a liar to say Eales didnt play rugby... as he clearly did.
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
The article would be lying.. he clearly played Rugby for a very long time... Only a moron would claim he didnt...

you call League Rugby... bully for you... you have every right too.. It would still make you an idiot or a liar to say Eales didnt play rugby... as he clearly did.

So everybody, such as Eales, who claims union is the only rugby is a liar and an idiot. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
So everybody, such as Eales, who claims union is the only rugby is a liar and an idiot. Thanks for clearing that up.

Yes they are... anybody who claims there is only one code of Rugby is clearly a liar and/or an idiot... But i have never heard him say that there is only one code of Rugby and being from Aussie i doubt he did. are you saying he has?
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
Yes they are... anybody who claims there is only one code of Rugby is clearly a liar and/or an idiot... But i have never heard him say that there is only one code of Rugby and being from Aussie i doubt he did. are you saying he has?

See here:

This is huge for rugby as since the introduction of Super Rugby in 1996 the game has had no presence on free-to-air television

There clearly has been lots of rugby on FTA in Australia, the NRL is shown every week during the season.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
See here:



There clearly has been lots of rugby on FTA in Australia, the NRL is shown every week during the season.

Are you really that simple??? its clear which code he is talking about... he is perfectly entitled to call it Rugby... after all that is what it is... nothing he said is wrong... those who the article are aimed at know which code he is talking about... surely you cant be that stupid that you cant see it.
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
Are you really that simple??? its clear which code he is talking about... he is perfectly entitled to call it Rugby... after all that is what it is... nothing he said is wrong... those who the article are aimed at know which code he is talking about... surely you cant be that stupid that you cant see it.

So when I say John Eales never played rugby it's clear what code I am talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
So when I say John Eales never played rugby it's clear what code I am talking about. Thanks for clearing that up.


It is clear to you and those who have read this thread. It is nice that you made is clear that you call rugby league rugby, or you would risk coming across as a total moron.



It is still a good article. If you bother to read it. But that is not really your point is it? Here's a tip - this isn't the fight club.
 

Paley

Juniors
Messages
1,619
It is clear to you and those who have read this thread. It is nice that you made is clear that you call rugby league rugby, or you would risk coming across as a total moron.



It is still a good article. If you bother to read it. But that is not really your point is it? Here's a tip - this isn't the fight club.

I fail to see why he mentioned rugby and AFL in a union article
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
I've seen some pretty impressive attempts at trolling on these forums over the last few years...

This is easily the worst attempt of them all.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
Do you think rugby league isn't a form of rugby?

Of course it is.. after all thats the first part of its name.... in the article he deferientiates the codes by calling it Rugby League... When talking about Rugby he is talking about his code of Rugby. He is perfectly entitled to do so since it is its name.... He calls League "Rugby League" much like most do in the southern hemisphere... and you have a problem with this? if you do then you are clearly trolling "Leagueunlimted"
 
Last edited:
Top