Rumours and Stuff

[Dibs]

Both.



Says who?



Well there you go.



It's called giving both (or more) sides of an argument. Every benefit has a cost, and some of you still need to learn that.

I think most know that you need to learn that the benefits need to outweigh the costs

 

[Poupou Escobar]

How do you know it was a member or members?

The members are the ones who voted for the board. And the board before that. And the board before that. And they will probably vote for the next board.

I'm sure you knew all this smartarse.

May have just been a disgruntled employee or one that thought they could make a few dollars selling it to the media

Yeah could've been anyone. The point is that the members decide who gets on the board. Hopefully next time they won't if the Losco Proposal gets up. At least until the next election.

 

[Dibs]

The members are the ones who voted for the board. And the board before that. And the board before that. And they will probably vote for the next board.

I'm sure you knew all this smartarse.



Yeah could've been anyone. The point is that the members decide who gets on the board. Hopefully next time they won't if the Losco Proposal gets up. At least until the next election.

Wtf does that have to do with someone leaking info to the media if said person is not a member f*ckstick? You're the f*cking idiot that said it was the members fault info got leaked and it may well have been but it's not the only option

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I think most know that you need to learn that the benefits need to outweigh the costs

Not with some of the comments you get around here. There isn't a decision that some merkin won't f**king whinge about. All cost, no benefit.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Wtf does that have to do with someone leaking info to the media if said person is not a member f*ckstick?

Because now the members have another chance to do themselves proud and elect another great board. Or do you expect them to change?

You're the f*cking idiot that said it was the members fault info got leaked and it may well have been but it's not the only option

No I said 'we' got the board sacked. Then I said the members would be the ones to pick a new one:

No I agree we'll be fine now we've sacked the board. The members will do the right thing. You have every other time hey?

I even referred to the members as 'you', to distinguish them from the people who sacked the board. :lol: Looks like you're the "f**king idiot" after all.

 

[Dibs]

Because now the members have another chance to do themselves proud and elect another great board. Or do you expect them to change?

That's not the point! You blamed members for leaking info but you don't know that as fact. I had no disagreement with you on the members being responsible for voting in the board that's blatantly obvious. Why is it definitely the members fault the info got leaked?

 

[Dibs]

Because now the members have another chance to do themselves proud and elect another great board. Or do you expect them to change?



No I said 'we' got the board sacked. Then I said the members would be the ones to pick a new one:



I even referred to the members as 'you', to distinguish them from the people who sacked the board. :lol: Looks like you're "f**king idiot" after all.

You're the f*cking idiot debating something I wasn't disagreeing with stick to the facts you deliberately stay away from what was actually argued because you know you are wrong

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You blamed members for leaking info

No I didn't. You've misread.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You're the f*cking idiot debating something I wasn't disagreeing with stick to the facts you deliberately stay away from what was actually argued because you know you are wrong

Punctuation?

 

[Dibs]

Punctuation?

Always the last resort of a loser on an Internet forum,.?'";:

 

[emjaycee]

Always the last resort of a loser on an Internet forum,.?'";:

I think you meant to say "looser"

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Always the last resort of a loser on an Internet forum,.?'";:

Pretty sure personal attacks were the last resort in this case. After that I was just having a laugh.

I already made my point. You spent three or four posts trying to take it off on a tangent to score a point "But but but you said the members got the board sacked!" then when I showed you I never blamed the members for that (they are to blame for the boards they elect) you threw a hissy fit. Without punctuation.

 

[Dibs]

Pretty sure personal attacks were the last resort in this case. After that I was just having a laugh.

I already made my point. You spent three or four posts trying to take it off on a tangent to score a point "But but but you said the members got the board sacked!" then when I showed you I never blamed the members for that (they are to blame for the boards they elect) you threw a hissy fit. Without punctuation.

Have a look again, I never made a comment at all about who got the board sacked. You argue with that many people you can't keep straight who said what. So who is going off on tangents to score points? Pou is again.

And no bringing up punctuation is the last resort I correctly called you a f*cking moron hours ago

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Have a look again, I never made a comment at all about who got the board sacked.

Except when you asked:

How do you know it was a member or members? May have just been a disgruntled employee or one that thought they could make a few dollars selling it to the media

and then said this:

Wtf does that have to do with someone leaking info to the media if said person is not a member f*ckstick? You're the f*cking idiot that said it was the members fault info got leaked and it may well have been but it's not the only option

and then this:

That's not the point! You blamed members for leaking info but you don't know that as fact. I had no disagreement with you on the members being responsible for voting in the board that's blatantly obvious. Why is it definitely the members fault the info got leaked?

You certainly went full genius in your effort to put words in my mouth. But luckily this is the internet and there is a record of what we wrote.

You argue with that many people you can't keep straight who said what. So who is going off on tangents to score points? Pou is again.

Well now you just look silly.

And no bringing up punctuation is the last resort I correctly called you a f*cking moron hours ago

See above.

 

[Dibs]

Except when you asked:



and then said this:



and then this:



You certainly went full genius in your effort to put words in my mouth. But luckily this is the internet and there is a record of what we wrote. And with this record on the internet you still can't show where I mentioned anything about the board being sacked



Well now you just look silly.



See above.

Once again as I said my comment was about who leaked info to the media and nrl. Where have I made comment at all about the board being sacked? All those posts relate to who leaked the info.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Once again as I said my comment was about who leaked info to the media and nrl. Where have I made comment at all about the board being sacked? All those posts relate to who leaked the info.

So you didn't spazz out accusing me of blaming the members for sacking the board, instead you chased me around accusing me of blaming the members for leaking info?

I'm sure my defence applies to both accusations.

 

[Dibs]

So you didn't spazz out accusing me of blaming the members for sacking the board, instead you chased me around accusing me of blaming the members for leaking info?

I'm sure my defence applies to both accusations.

I'm sure it doesn't have another drink Pou I'm off to bed.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I'm sure it doesn't

No, it totally does:

No I agree we'll be fine now we've sacked the board. The members will do the right thing. You have every other time hey?

When did we sack the board?

When we fed details of our in house discussions to the NRL and media.

As you can see I never accused the members of either leaking info or sacking the board. 'We' did that, specifically the f**kwits that surround the club. I suppose that group includes the members, but it also includes plenty of people who aren't. But I'm not a member, so when I say 'we' did something I'm obviously not including them.

Quod erat demonstrandum, merkin.

 

[EelsFan05]

No I agree we'll be fine now we've sacked the board. The members will do the right thing. You have every other time hey?

And the people like you sit back, do nothing and criticise the ones that try.

 

[Gary Gutful]

It was quite genius actually...

Sharp signs Foran on massive overs, then he buggered up his hamstrings so he couldn't start right away. Then he broke him up with his missus and talked him into OD'ing on pills. Anyone else would just stop there, right? Not Sharp, this is why he's genius, He logged into Keirans TAB account and blew 70 grand on horses and whatnot, then, busted his shoulder so he wouldn't be able to play anymore this season. Does he stop there? Hell no. He makes him miss some commitments and stuff (I don't know what exactly, you'll need to ask Avenger), so the club will have no choice but to breach him and fine him.

All the while feeding every detail to the press. As I said before, genius.

F**ken plumber. Something gave me the impression he was dodgy. This just proves it.