Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,385
Kritchard and IDG are both contracted for next year, whence they are off contract.IDG isn't. He signed for 2 years at end of last year I think.
Kritchard and IDG are both contracted for next year, whence they are off contract.IDG isn't. He signed for 2 years at end of last year I think.
Ain't gonna happen.
Someone's got to play reserves.If we're not going to give King a go now, then why do even bother having him here?
Is it true Gary that when a whale orgasms it shoots it sperm for kilometers away.
Have you ever been sprayed by a whales floating sperm?
Both. But in the other order, one after the other.Would that be flotsam or jetsam?
I have no idea, I remember he had huge wraps on him when he was at St.George has he really been that awful in reserve grade?If we're not going to give King a go now, then why do even bother having him here?
Seems to be solid defence and little else. Probably not top 17 worthy but worth a shot in the top 25.How does the big horse go? I havent seen much of him.
Solid defender?
Line speed?
Attacking flair?
Kicking game?
How much would he cost?
Could be an option I guess.
Not saying you're wrong but generally speaking teams get at least one bye in an origin lead up week so it'd 14 games he would play. But anyway he's only played that or less than that once in his career so I'm not sure why people all of a sudden think that's all he'll play. Other then that I agree with you that we should only take him for a price that doesn't inhibit our squad goals. Though I also think (IF Peats is even considering returning) he can thank whoever tackled Kaysa yesterday, as it may have lifted our willingness to pay moreSo in 14,15 and 16 hes averaged 16 games each year. We wont look at 2017 as that would blow your arguement even further. Now take away 3 Origin games brings his avearge to 13 games per year. Would Peats back up after Origin? Well on his initial game he didnt so this could impact further. Based on your numbers he would play about one out of two on average. $650k for 13 games each year. Like I said I love Peatsy. I just think we can get better bang for our buck. IMO.
I'm amazed you don't have panfers winning minor premiership. No one can tell what the min points will be. If knights and tigers lose all their remaining matches, souffs and tits struggle then maybe teams need 32 to make 8. We could blow 30 by both knights and tigers plus our other wins and lose in golden point for our losses and finish on 28 and decent f/a. Way too f**king early too knowI have saints and manly finishing on 30 points along with Panthers.
Canberra have a hard draw. I can see them not getting past 26 points.
Eels need 32 to be safe and make top 8. 30 may not be enough.
I will bet 1000s 28 with our for and against certainly wont be.
We need to win 6/9.
I have saints and manly finishing on 30 points along with Panthers.
Canberra have a hard draw. I can see them not getting past 26 points.
Eels need 32 to be safe and make top 8. 30 may not be enough.
I will bet 1000s 28 with our for and against certainly wont be.
We need to win 6/9.
Would be just our luck to set the record for having the most wins and still missing out on the finals. (2years in a row)Raiders still have 6 games in Canberra at the height of the winter.
Manly play only 3 at Home at Lottoland and have 7 Away and a Home Game in Perth.
Dragons have only three game at WIN or Kogarah.
If we get to 30 points we should be Ok
Would be just our luck to set the record for having the most wins and still missing out on the finals. (2years in a row)
Would be just our luck to set the record for having the most wins and still missing out on the finals. (2years in a row)
So long as it's not against us.I think you'll see some of these teams in the bottom 4 win a fair few games.
Oh yes, I forgot about those cheating merkins.Storm had 14 wins in 2010. Dogs had 20 wins in 2002.