What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Incorrect

Coach
Messages
12,600
Cut the BS out we all know the reason he was playing in a different position in reggies and it had SFA to do with utility value.

The now former coach sure as shit didn't rate his ultilty value when Bailey Simmonson got knocked out in the first min against Penrith in round 2 and we had to play Kelma Tulaigi in the centres while Hands sat on the bench for 77 mins.

Has your selective memory forgotten about that game.
Yeah funny how BA had no problem shifting Drown to the centres to get his awesome backup son Jake a run in the top grade but wouldn't do the same thing when we had a genuine injury crisis and a "utility" on the bench and instead played Kelma out there.... That charlatan used the club as his own plaything with a misplaced emphasis on developing the questionable talents of his offspring.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,071
Quite a measured article actually.

It will no doubt be derided by some on here, but all in all it's a fair summation of how this has hamstrung us.

The interesting thing to take from it is the assertion that "Parramatta have close to half the players in the competition with options in their favour - or partially in their favour - on their books for 2026."

Are we that smarter and more innovative than the rest of the competition? Or has this course been undertaken in error?
Here’s an alternate take that doesn’t require us to sneer at the decisions of people we don’t know, under conditions we also don’t understand:

We had just completed a period of relative success that has been rare for our club for decades. 2019-2022 was only the second time since 1986 that we had made the finals four consecutive years. Technically it was the fourth, since 1997 to 2002 counts as three separate four year periods, but you get the idea. We have struggled to keep a team together since Price and Cronin retired.

Against this backdrop, we were trying to fit as much talent under the cap as we could, and unlike some other clubs, we had no magical ways of getting merkins to stay for unders. This is where player options come in. How about, instead of giving you that extra $50k-$100k, we give you some insurance at the back end of your contract instead? Most players would prefer the extra cash (I would) but a couple were willing to make the trade off.

All hypothetical but so is your claim that the club bent over for player managers who somehow only wanted player options for a couple of their players instead of for all of them.

And if player options are the sign of a weak, stupid and unsuccessful club, why don’t the Tigers have any? Why aren’t managers trying to rort them for POs? Your theory makes no sense, which Is understandable given you got it from rugby league gutter journos.
The results are there for all to see
Where? The seasons where these POs come due haven’t even happened yet ffs
and for mine the article highlights the poor course undertaken by the club - but I suppose it's a matter of perspective because for some on here the 2022 Grand Final and the current roster state are proof that this course was exactly right.
What was wrong with the 2022 grand final squad? It was a solid team, and it’s no wonder the salary cap pulled it apart. Our problem was we had no cheap talent ready to bring into the team to replace the ones who left. Fortunately we have much stronger juniors in 2025. Most of those SG Ball merkins from 2023 are 21 next season.
 

Tiger5150

Bench
Messages
3,754
Against this backdrop, we were trying to fit as much talent under the cap as we could, and unlike some other clubs, we had no magical ways of getting merkins to stay for unders. This is where player options come in. How about, instead of giving you that extra $50k-$100k, we give you some insurance at the back end of your contract instead? Most players would prefer the extra cash (I would) but a couple were willing to make the trade off.

All hypothetical but so is your claim that the club bent over for player managers who somehow only wanted player options for a couple of their players instead of for all of them.
If its all hypothetical, why doesnt the club just say this is the price we want to pay p.a. for this many years, take it or leave it? How many players walked away from the club because a PO wasnt offered? Would Mose and Drown have walked? Will never know because Eels folded like an Aldi beach chair.

And if player options are the sign of a weak, stupid and unsuccessful club, why don’t the Tigers have any? Why aren’t managers trying to rort them for POs? Your theory makes no sense, which Is understandable given you got it from rugby league gutter journos.
If PO's are a smart, clever tactic, why dont any of the top 8 clubs have any?
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,071
Didn’t we try to shop Matto around but there were no takers so he took up his option. That would indicate we’ve been forced to keep a player that we would prefer not to.
It’s no different to trying to get rid of any other contracted player, such as RCG, Sivo and Gutherson. I’m sure Matterson will still be a solid contributor next year. It’s not like he’s become a bum. He was our best forward two years ago.

In any case, being able to activate the option even if the club doesn’t want the player to stay is the point of the PO. That’s why it has value to the player and a cost to the club. A club wouldn’t agree to it unless it saved them money. Likewise, a player wouldn’t agree to it unless he was happy with the cost.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top